Ben Johnson

Self-sabotage: The Republican Party establishment sunk Ken Cuccinelli’s campaign, conservatives say

Ben Johnson
Ben Johnson
Image

RICHMOND, VA, November 6, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Ken Cuccinelli's surprisingly close loss in the Virginia governor's race yesterday has brought a resounding reaction: He could have won if elite members of the Republican Party had not abandoned him out of spite.

“I never thought I would live to see this kind of self-sabotage,” talk radio titan Rush Limbaugh said today.

“They didn't want him to win. This is the dirty little secret,” he said.

Rush said the Republican Establishment is perfectly happy to lose elections, as long as it does not lose control of the GOP to the party's social and fiscal conservatives.

“Such is the animus toward the Tea Party in the Republican Party establishment that they are perfectly comfortable with a [Chris] Christie win [in New Jersey] and a Cuccinelli loss, because to them that's a Tea Party loss,” he added. “Now the Republican establishment can run around and claim the Tea Party is an albatross around their neck.”

The indifference and nonfeasance that led to losing a winnable race stemmed from the ruling class' lust for power and disdain for the pro-life position, he stated.

“Conservatism in general repulses the Republican establishment. The Tea Party repulses them, because they don't control it,” Limbaugh told his audience of millions.

Leaders inside the GOP “think the Tea Party is a bunch of radical extremist conservative kook freak pro-lifers,” he said.

As influential as he is, he was far from alone in his assessment.

Richard Viguerie, a decades-long activist inside the Republican Party, wrote at ConservativeHQ.com, “The national leadership of the Republican Party engaged in a summer-long whispering campaign against Ken Cuccinelli that more or less mirrored the Democrat’s charge that Cuccinelli is an 'extremist' and the organizations controlled by national Republicans gave only nominal support to Cuccinelli.”

“Ken Cuccinelli did not lose last night because he is a principled limited government constitutional conservative. Cuccinelli lost because he was drowned in a sea of money and undercut by a Republican establishment that would rather see a Democrat in the Governor’s mansion than end the good ole boy politics...and allow a real conservative anywhere near the levers of power,” Viguerie said.

Critics pointed to many of the same pieces of evidence that, had it wanted to, the Republican Party could have done much more to secure the race.

While the Republican National Committee donated $9 million to Governor Bob McDonnell's 2009 race – which was seen as a walkaway election – it gave only one-third that much to Cuccinelli. This year the RNC gave more than $1 million to Chris Christie, whose re-election was never seriously contested.

The Chamber of Commerce and other Republican megadonors did not give Cuccinelli a dime.

Although Chuck Todd of MSNBC reported that the Cuccinelli campaign “begged” New Jersey Governor Chris Christie to campaign for him, Christie refused.

Virginia's attorney general – the first in the nation to file a lawsuit against ObamaCare – found precious little support aside from $8 million from the Republican Governors Association and the backing of pro-life and Second Amendment organizations such as the Susan B. Anthony List and the NRA.

The Virginia GOP was hopelessly divided, as Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling and many of his supporters refused to endorse Cuccinelli after Bolling lost the party's nomination. Virginia Congressman and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's former chief of staff, Boyd Marcus, actively assisted Terry McAuliffe's campaign.

Finally, the Democrat-funded Libertarian Party candidate Rob Sarvis siphoned off approximately six percent of the vote, allowing McAuliffe – like his former boss, Bill Clinton – to win the election with a minority of the vote.

The Cuccinelli campaign publicly questioned the GOP's dedication, and judgment, on election night.

Click "like" if you want to end abortion!

“We were on our own,” Cuccinelli strategist Chris La Civita told The Washington Post. “There are a lot of questions people are going to be asking and that is, 'Was leaving Cuccinelli alone in the first week of October a smart move?'”

By some estimates, the Cuccinelli campaign ran no media for the last two weeks of the campaign in key markets, including the D.C. suburbs, due to lack of funds. Ultimately, those exurban areas delivered the one-to-two percent margin of victory to the Democrats Tuesday night.

McAuliffe boasted the support of numerous out-of-state billionaires and a national network of Clinton-friendly donors, who allowed McAuliffe to outspend Cuccinelli by 75 percent overall.

The RNC defended itself against massive backlash Wednesday morning, saying that former Chairman Michael Steele had overspent on the McDonnell race, and current leadership was simply correcting his mistake. But not everyone was buying it.

Judson Phillips, founder of the Tea Party Nation, said, “After being stabbed in the back by the RINO Republicans, it is amazing how close Ken Cuccinelli has kept this race.”

“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who spent $1 million in 2009 and nothing in 2013,” Jenny Beth Martin, national coordinator for Tea Party Patriots, wrote in an election post mortem. “Just think what would have happened if the business and donor classes of the Republican Party would have helped.”

Daisy, a part of the female conservative team Chicks on the Right, wrote that she hoped the GOP Establishment changed its ways, because “I, for one, am sick and tired of watching us needlessly lose elections.”

NRO editor Jonah Goldberg added, “For all the talk about how the base needs to cooperate with the establishment more, it’s worth remembering that the base almost always does its part on Election Day. Its the establishment that is less reliable in returning the favor.”

For Viguerie, the performance of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus and other GOP donors “is proof that conservatives are wasting their money giving to the RNC, and it is convincing evidence that the RNC leadership must be replaced if America is ever to be governed according to conservative principles.”

LifeSiteNews.com contacted Gary Bauer for comment but did not hear back by press time. 

Truth. Delivered daily.

Get FREE pro-life, pro-family news delivered straight to your inbox. 

Select Your Edition:


Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Julie Ralph

My 7-year-old son found porn on his iPod, even with a filter

Julie Ralph
By Julie Ralph

A few weeks ago an article went viral on my Facebook feed entitled “The Day My 10-Year-Old Discovered Hardcore Porn on his iPhone.”  As one Mom after another shared and commented about how frightening and horrible it was and wondered what do we do to prevent it, I commented on several of those shares (perhaps a little smugly and proudly) that WE had installed an excellent filtering program on all of our devices that even filters YouTube.  I most likely left the impression that WE have no worries in this house, that our kids can watch their iPods and kindles, even those annoying Minecraft how to videos on YouTube, and WE don’t have to worry about them seeing filth. 

Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, WRONG.

I could have entitled this blog post “The Day My 7-Year-Old Discovered Porn on His iPod” but it might look like I’m trying to one-up that other Mom.  Which I’m not.  Because, trust me, this is one Mom competition I’d rather lose. 

This is no longer a battle friends, it’s an all-out war.  It’s a war we’re fighting for the minds and futures of our children.

So YES we have this supposedly great and awesome filter on all of our devices and we pay about $70 a year for it.   Look, I’ve been on my computer trying to shop for a swimsuit at Lands End and the filter blocked me.  Annoying, yes.  But assuring.  I remember thinking wow….if I can’t even get on here and see the tummy-sucking-miracle-fat-hiding-mawmaw-swimsuits, my boys will NEVER be able to discover Victoria or her Secret.   And I’ve been on YouTube trying to see how to quickly defrost CHICKEN breasts, and it blocked several videos AND ads that probably had nothing to do with fowl or a thawing method.  Again I remember thinking, good.  This is really good.  Nothing to worry about.

Then last night happened.

My youngest son was visibly shaken as he was getting ready for bed.  I knew something was wrong when I saw he was wearing his flannel pajamas with the mountain bears printed all over them on one of the hottest August nights this month.   He seemed almost disoriented and I asked him if he was sick as he was trying to quickly crawl into bed and pull the covers over his head.   He then reached over to the bedside table, grabbed his little iPod, and tossed it to me saying he doesn’t deserve it anymore because he is bad.  “I’m bad, so bad….I saw bad things.”  My heart started racing and I felt like I had been punched in the gut.  Because I knew where this was going.  Very calmly and quietly I assured him he was not bad and there was nothing in the world he could ever tell me that would make me think he was bad.  “What did you see, sweetheart?” I asked.  After about ten minutes of me coaxing it out of him, with a wobbly still-tiny-smidge-of-baby-left voice he told me he was searching for a word he had heard and he spelled it for me.  T-t-i-s.  (I quickly unscrambled and knew what he meant).  He went on to tell me he searched for this on YouTube (the app is not even on his iPod….he must go through the “filter” app to access it!).   He told me he saw pictures and videos.

Click "like" if you say NO to porn!

My stomach turned.  I ran through all the “How To” files I’d stored away in my mind.  You know those files….situations you’ve thought about as a Mom and how you’d handle…you file them away for another day.  Usually one you hope will never come.   Turns out I didn’t have a file for this.  Because I honestly thought we had done everything on the front end to keep it from happening. 

I ran my fingers through his hair and pulled him close and started talking to him from my broken heart.  I asked him if he knew what that word meant before he searched for it.  He said no.  I told him it is a very crude and ugly word for something that is not crude and ugly.  I told him what the proper word is and I asked him if he knew why God made them like that on women?  He said no.  I told him it was the miraculous and wonderful way that God made women able to feed their babies.  I told him how every woman who has those is made to feed a baby, and those women in those pictures and videos are either already someone’s Mommy or they will be one day.  And what God meant for a beautiful purpose is twisted and made into something very wrong and ugly by those pictures and videos.

Don’t trust some computer geek working for a software company to care a flip for or protect your kids.

We continued to talk and then we prayed together and I left him to sleep as I walked back to my room for a sleepless night.  I cried for the ugly, messed up, twisted, and sick world out there that I can’t protect my children from.  I cried for what he had seen that I couldn’t un-see for him.  I cried because I had abdicated MY parenting duties to some stupid computer software that I thought would protect my children.  I cried because I can never get back that bit of innocence he lost way, way too early.  I cried as I went onto YouTube, put in that same search and saw just the thumbnails of what he had to have seen.  I just can’t bring myself to actually click on the videos.  I cried because, when I went in to check on him later, he was curled up with Big Bear in one arm and his little blue and white checked blanket in the other.  He’s still a baby. 

I’m mad now.  And I really hope my anger continues to burn because I need it to fuel my diligence.   I need my guard to be up and to stay up.  This is no longer a battle friends, it’s an all-out war.  It’s a war we’re fighting for the minds and futures of our children.  I know there are those who would say I’m being overly dramatic, that I can’t put my children in a bubble, blah blah blah.  I don’t care.  I will do whatever it takes to protect my children until their minds, bodies and emotions are better prepared to grasp, filter, and sort through the warped and ugly parts of our world that are pulling on them.  I will continue to pull back and hold on for dear life.   Don’t do as I did, friends.  Don’t trust some computer geek working for a software company to care a flip for or protect your kids.  Do as I am doing now.  Uninstall any and all browsers or video apps on your kids’ personal devices and set the restrictions where they can’t install apps anymore without asking you first.   Have one central computer in a public area of your home that they may use, with permission, and still with filter software installed.  But remember that’s not the first line of defense in this war.

You are.

Julie Ralph blogs at Mommy, Esquire, where this piece was originally published.

Advertisement
Featured Image
Sen. Ted Cruz's wife douses him with water as part of the Ice Bucket challenge for ALS research. Youtube
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

,

Sen. Ted Cruz: Do the ALS challenge, donate to pro-life institute

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins

One of the nation's most prominent senators is doing the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge -- but encouraging donations to a pro-life ALS research institute.

In the last month, the ALS Ice Bucket challenge, sponsored by the ALS Association, has raised tens of millions of dollars for research for the disease, commonly known as Lou Gehrig's Disease. However, in mid-August pro-life leaders raised awareness that the Association supports embryonic stem-cell research.

Embryonic stem-cell research includes the destruction of a human embryo, and is thus condemned by pro-life advocates as an abortion. The Association has said it currently has one project that uses embryonic stem cells, funded by an outside donor.

In a Facebook post on Tuesday, Cruz -- who took the challenge last week -- said that he and his wife "are proud to personally support the John Paul II Medical Research Institute the Home of Give Cures (http://jp2mri.org), which conducts groundbreaking research into curing this terrible disease, without using embryonic stem cells."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

"The JPII Institute respects human life, and is working to improve the lives of all of us," said Cruz. 

The ALS Association has said donors may specify their dollars not be used to fund embryonic stem-cell research. However, critics note that donated funds are fungible, meaning they potentially free up funds the Association can then direct to illicit research.

At least two Catholic dioceses have encouraged Ice Bucket Challenge participants to donate to the JPII Medical Institute.

Advertisement
Featured Image
7989 West Virginia Drive, Dallas, where Planned Parenthood is working on secretly opening up a new abortion facility. Google Streetview
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

,

Pro-abortion study: Texas will be down to eight abortion clinics by fall

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins

A study by a pro-abortion research group shows that Texas will be down from 41 abortion clinics in July 2013 to eight by this fall.

In July, the Texas Policy Evaluation Project found that six abortion clinics matched the standards required in HB2, which was signed into law 13 months ago. Those standards include requiring abortion doctors to have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles of clinics at which they work, a standard already in place, and a requirement that all abortion clinics must upgrade their facilities to the same standards as ambulatory surgery centers.

The study estimates that a total of eight clinics will be able to meet the ambulatory standards, including one that will open in the fall. The standards take effect on September 1. According to the study, this means there will be one abortion clinic for every one million Texans who could become pregnant. An infographic from the study shows that the existing clinics will be located on the eastern half of the state, largely near metropolitan areas.

The study's results, published in the peer-reviewed journal Contraception, have abortion supporters outraged. Andrea Grimes of RH Reality Check writes, "No legal abortion facilities will operate south or west of San Antonio," and that five of the clinics will be operated by Planned Parenthood.

However, the closure of so many clinics is good news to pro-life activists like Karen Garnett, who heads the Catholic Pro-Life Committee in the Diocese of Dallas.

"The closing of abortion facilities in Texas the last few years has been the result of the owners of the facilities themselves not being willing or able to comply with the higher standards of medical safety" required by the Texas legislature, Garnett told LifeSiteNews. "Pro-life activists and leaders in Dallas (and Texas) have been working vigilantly with the members of the Texas legislature the last few years to pass these sensible laws.  There is much to be said for the power of prayer, particularly through the powerful 40 Days for Life campaign and prayer vigils."

While abortion supporters claim Texas is abandoning pregnant women, Garnett said the Catholic Pro-Life Committee in Dallas has "helped more than 7,500 mothers choose life outside the abortion facilities," but "we don't stop there."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

"Our Project Gabriel Ministry takes the next step. For those mothers needing and desiring spiritual, emotional and material help, we offer Gabriel Angels, who are paired with them in a one-on-one mentoring and support relationship. We also have a Gabriel Resource Coordinator on staff to help them with practical needs as their situations stabilize." Life skills classes, adoption counseling, and partnerships with pregnancy centers are also part of the Diocese's work to help pregnant mothers.

Jor-El Godsey of Heartbeat International said that there are 326 pregnancy help organizations across the state, which outnumber abortion clinics by approximately 40 to 1. He estimated that approximately 120,000 pregnant women have come to care centers in 2014.

The Texas Policy Evaluation Project, which is funded by an anonymous donor, is a five-year effort to "analyze the impact of the measures affecting reproductive health passed by the 82nd and 83rd Texas Legislatures." The project's partners include the University of Texas at Austin’s Population Research Center, the pro-abortion Ibis Reproductive Health, and the University of Alabama-Birmingham. One of the project's investigators is Daniel Grossman, whose biography says that "his current research at Ibis includes both clinical and social science studies aimed at improving access to contraception and safe abortion."

The project has also published reports titled "The Public Health Threat of Anti-Abortion Legislation," and "Finding the Twitter Users that Stood With Wendy." The latter examined social media support for gubernatorial candidate Wendy Davis, who briefly became a national figure for her support of late-term abortions in 2013.

Share this article

Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook