Ben Johnson

Self-sabotage: The Republican Party establishment sunk Ken Cuccinelli’s campaign, conservatives say

Ben Johnson
Ben Johnson

RICHMOND, VA, November 6, 2013 ( – Ken Cuccinelli's surprisingly close loss in the Virginia governor's race yesterday has brought a resounding reaction: He could have won if elite members of the Republican Party had not abandoned him out of spite.

“I never thought I would live to see this kind of self-sabotage,” talk radio titan Rush Limbaugh said today.

“They didn't want him to win. This is the dirty little secret,” he said.

Rush said the Republican Establishment is perfectly happy to lose elections, as long as it does not lose control of the GOP to the party's social and fiscal conservatives.

“Such is the animus toward the Tea Party in the Republican Party establishment that they are perfectly comfortable with a [Chris] Christie win [in New Jersey] and a Cuccinelli loss, because to them that's a Tea Party loss,” he added. “Now the Republican establishment can run around and claim the Tea Party is an albatross around their neck.”

The indifference and nonfeasance that led to losing a winnable race stemmed from the ruling class' lust for power and disdain for the pro-life position, he stated.

“Conservatism in general repulses the Republican establishment. The Tea Party repulses them, because they don't control it,” Limbaugh told his audience of millions.

Leaders inside the GOP “think the Tea Party is a bunch of radical extremist conservative kook freak pro-lifers,” he said.

As influential as he is, he was far from alone in his assessment.

Richard Viguerie, a decades-long activist inside the Republican Party, wrote at, “The national leadership of the Republican Party engaged in a summer-long whispering campaign against Ken Cuccinelli that more or less mirrored the Democrat’s charge that Cuccinelli is an 'extremist' and the organizations controlled by national Republicans gave only nominal support to Cuccinelli.”

“Ken Cuccinelli did not lose last night because he is a principled limited government constitutional conservative. Cuccinelli lost because he was drowned in a sea of money and undercut by a Republican establishment that would rather see a Democrat in the Governor’s mansion than end the good ole boy politics...and allow a real conservative anywhere near the levers of power,” Viguerie said.

Critics pointed to many of the same pieces of evidence that, had it wanted to, the Republican Party could have done much more to secure the race.

While the Republican National Committee donated $9 million to Governor Bob McDonnell's 2009 race – which was seen as a walkaway election – it gave only one-third that much to Cuccinelli. This year the RNC gave more than $1 million to Chris Christie, whose re-election was never seriously contested.

The Chamber of Commerce and other Republican megadonors did not give Cuccinelli a dime.

Although Chuck Todd of MSNBC reported that the Cuccinelli campaign “begged” New Jersey Governor Chris Christie to campaign for him, Christie refused.

Virginia's attorney general – the first in the nation to file a lawsuit against ObamaCare – found precious little support aside from $8 million from the Republican Governors Association and the backing of pro-life and Second Amendment organizations such as the Susan B. Anthony List and the NRA.

The Virginia GOP was hopelessly divided, as Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling and many of his supporters refused to endorse Cuccinelli after Bolling lost the party's nomination. Virginia Congressman and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's former chief of staff, Boyd Marcus, actively assisted Terry McAuliffe's campaign.

Finally, the Democrat-funded Libertarian Party candidate Rob Sarvis siphoned off approximately six percent of the vote, allowing McAuliffe – like his former boss, Bill Clinton – to win the election with a minority of the vote.

The Cuccinelli campaign publicly questioned the GOP's dedication, and judgment, on election night.

Click "like" if you want to end abortion!

“We were on our own,” Cuccinelli strategist Chris La Civita told The Washington Post. “There are a lot of questions people are going to be asking and that is, 'Was leaving Cuccinelli alone in the first week of October a smart move?'”

By some estimates, the Cuccinelli campaign ran no media for the last two weeks of the campaign in key markets, including the D.C. suburbs, due to lack of funds. Ultimately, those exurban areas delivered the one-to-two percent margin of victory to the Democrats Tuesday night.

McAuliffe boasted the support of numerous out-of-state billionaires and a national network of Clinton-friendly donors, who allowed McAuliffe to outspend Cuccinelli by 75 percent overall.

The RNC defended itself against massive backlash Wednesday morning, saying that former Chairman Michael Steele had overspent on the McDonnell race, and current leadership was simply correcting his mistake. But not everyone was buying it.

Judson Phillips, founder of the Tea Party Nation, said, “After being stabbed in the back by the RINO Republicans, it is amazing how close Ken Cuccinelli has kept this race.”

“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who spent $1 million in 2009 and nothing in 2013,” Jenny Beth Martin, national coordinator for Tea Party Patriots, wrote in an election post mortem. “Just think what would have happened if the business and donor classes of the Republican Party would have helped.”

Daisy, a part of the female conservative team Chicks on the Right, wrote that she hoped the GOP Establishment changed its ways, because “I, for one, am sick and tired of watching us needlessly lose elections.”

NRO editor Jonah Goldberg added, “For all the talk about how the base needs to cooperate with the establishment more, it’s worth remembering that the base almost always does its part on Election Day. Its the establishment that is less reliable in returning the favor.”

For Viguerie, the performance of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus and other GOP donors “is proof that conservatives are wasting their money giving to the RNC, and it is convincing evidence that the RNC leadership must be replaced if America is ever to be governed according to conservative principles.” contacted Gary Bauer for comment but did not hear back by press time. 

Featured Image
LifeSiteNews staff


Colorado baker appeals gvmt ‘re-education’ order

LifeSiteNews staff
By LifeSiteNews staff

A Colorado cake artist who declined to use his creative talents to promote and endorse a same-sex ceremony appealed a May 30 order from the Colorado Civil Rights Commission to the Colorado Court of Appeals Wednesday.

The commission’s order requires cake artist Jack Phillips and his staff at Masterpiece Cakeshop to create cakes for same-sex celebrations, forces him to re-educate his staff that Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Act means that artists must endorse all views, compels him to implement new policies to comply with the commission’s order, and requires him to file quarterly “compliance” reports for two years. The reports must include the number of patrons declined a wedding cake or any other product and state the reason for doing so to ensure he has fully eliminated his religious beliefs from his business.

“Americans should not be forced by the government – or by another citizen – to endorse or promote ideas with which they disagree,” said the cake artist’s lead counsel Nicolle Martin, an attorney allied with Alliance Defending Freedom. “This is not about the people who asked for a cake; it’s about the message the cake communicates. Just as Jack doesn’t create baked works of art for other events with which he disagrees, he doesn’t create cake art for same-sex ceremonies regardless of who walks in the door to place the order.”

“In America, we don’t force artists to create expression that is contrary to their convictions,” added Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Legal Counsel Jeremy Tedesco. “A paint artist who identifies as homosexual shouldn’t be intimidated into creating a painting that celebrates one-man, one-woman marriage. A pro-life photographer shouldn’t be forced to work a pro-abortion rally. And Christian cake artists shouldn’t be punished for declining to participate in a same-sex ceremony or promote its message.”

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

In July 2012, Charlie Craig and David Mullins asked Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, to make a wedding cake to celebrate their same-sex ceremony. In an exchange lasting about 30 seconds, Phillips politely declined, explaining that he would gladly make them any other type of baked item they wanted but that he could not make a cake promoting a same-sex ceremony because of his faith. Craig and Mullins, now represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, immediately left the shop and later filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Division. The case now goes to the Colorado Court of Appeals as Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Craig.

“Jack, and other cake artists like him – such as those seen on TV shows like ‘Ace of Cakes’ and ‘Cake Boss’ – prepare unique creations that are inherently expressive,” Tedesco explained. “Jack invests many hours in the wedding cake creative process, which includes meeting the clients, designing and sketching the cake, and then baking, sculpting, and decorating it. The ACLU calls Jack a mere ‘retail service provider,’ but, in fact, he is an artist who uses his talents and abilities to create expression that the First Amendment fully protects."

Celebrity cake artists have written publicly about their art and the significant expressive work that goes into the artistic design process for wedding cakes.

Featured Image
Judie Brown

, ,

Wireless birth control is no fantasy

Judie Brown
By Judie Brown

Recent reports announcing the era of remote-control contraception herald the very real but slightly horrifying prospects for the future for those who believe that man can literally transform himself into a machine. This phenomenon is known as the cult of transhumanism.

One news report calls the remote dispensation of contraception “creepy.” Another explains how this may come to fruition: “A challenge from Bill Gates two years ago has put science on the cusp of a revolutionary, remote-controlled method of birth control.”

Technology Review says the wireless implant, if approved for safety and efficacy, could make it possible for a woman to turn her birth control on and off at will by using a remote-control device. The implanted chip contains the chemical levonorgestrel—the same ingredient in Plan B One-Step (emergency contraception). So a woman would literally be able to abort children by remote control.

CBS News states, “The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has committed funding to a preclinical trial on a user-controlled microchip that can effectively prevent unwanted pregnancies for up to 16 years. The futuristic birth control method could make it to the general market as early as 2018.”

Upon hearing of this latest Gates Foundation venture, Professor Dianne Irving sent this comment to her e-mail list on July 10:

Well, if Darwin’s “survival of the fittest” is accurate, then the majority of women today who succumb to this “remote contraceptive” lure for “family planning” being promoted by MIT will be rendered infertile, thus significantly reducing the number of such women in the future. Have to give Bill Gates “credit” for advancing this creative eugenics pop control agenda—especially for women in Third World countries. And while “chemical” control is bad enough, what happens when someone else gains physical access to the woman’s remote control??? Human traffickers and rejected former lovers rejoice!

This valuable insight should give each of us pause. The truth of the matter is that even among Catholic communities, there are growing numbers of men and women—young and old—who have never heard Catholic teaching on contraception, do not understand why the Church defines it as evil, and consistently balk at being told the truth. Catholics like these have no problem with the government mandating taxpayers like you and me to pay for contraception. 

This is but one reason why it may well come to pass that this latest freaky discovery may grow into something so popular that the negative effects it is destined to have will be noted too late. 

On the other hand, SALON’s Sarah Gray cautions that, as of today, 

There are, of course, large kinks to work out before this could become a viable contraceptive method (not including political battles over birth control). A commenter on MIT Technology Review worries about who could potentially control such a device without the woman’s consent. It is a rather scary prospect.

The chips would need all sorts of encryption to protect data and keep the device safe from hackers. As technology entwines itself more and more within the fabric of our being—quite literally in this case—we must tread carefully, especially in terms of health.

Time will tell whether or not the transition of the human being from human to a combination of human and machine will really overtake mankind. 

Transhumanists are prepared for this future. We must not forget these wise words written by Linda Kimball: 

Transhumanism is a powerfully influential planetary “elite” movement that believes man can begin a radical transfiguration of himself by merging his brain with technology with the long term goal of eventually transferring his “essence” out of his decaying body and into a highly advanced robo-machine.

Kimball concludes, “There are only two kinds of people in the end: those who say to God, ‘Thy will be done,’ and those to whom God says, in the end, ‘Thy will be done.’ All that are in Hell chose it.”

And that is absolutely no fantasy!

Reprinted with permission from

Featured Image
American Life League
Philip Wegmann


Pro-life assaults on the rise: activist group

Philip Wegmann
By Philip Wegmann

There has been a rise in attacks on pro-lifers, according to an activist group.

Seth Drayer, Director of Training for pro-life group Created Equal, views the attacks as a sign of the movement’s success. Drayer told The Daily Signal that these incidents represent “a desperate attempt” at censure because the opposition “knows we have a winning strategy.”

Earlier in July, Created Equal made headlines when Drayer was assaulted during a sidewalk protest of abortion in downtown Columbus, Ohio. This video of an abortion supporter disrupting the event and assaulting Drayer went viral:

>>> This video contains graphic language and images.

Drayer says this is the first physical assault he’s experienced but reports that “there has been a rise in the number of attacks.” In a separate interview, Created Equal executive director Mark Harrington claimed that “violent attacks on pro-lifers are becoming more common.”

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

A national organization with a focus on the millennial generation, Created Equal trains thousands of college students to discuss and debate the abortion issue on college campuses and street corners.

At each protest, the group prominently displays violent and gruesome images of aborted children to spark conversation. Drayer, who is unapologetic for the graphic content, argues that “every successful social reform movement has always directly and graphically exposed injustice rather than hiding it.”

Well aware of the inflammatory nature of the topic, Drayer says that his group doesn’t create conflict but rather works to exposes it.

“Whenever you have injustice, it creates a lot of hidden tension because we can’t corporately as a nation kill, decapitate, dismember, and disembowel 3,000 humans every day without there being some byproduct of frustration or pain that’s been hidden or pushed away.”

To diffuse this tension, the group tries to emulate the American Civil Right movement by following a strict strategy of passive non-violence. Drayer explained that just as Martin Luther King, Jr., “contrasted racism and love” his group hopes to “contrast abortion with love.”

An evangelical Christian, Drayer says that his faith and the example of King have motivated his and the organization’s response to the recent assault. Created Equal has already offered to drop all charges if the abortion supporter will apologize.

“The offer is still there. We’ve forgiven her and we hold no malice toward her,” Drayer explained.

Reprinted with permission from the Daily Signal.


Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook