Damian Goddard

The olympic hurdler’s greatest hurdle: ‘Lolo’ Jones’ virginity

Damian Goddard
By Damian Goddard
Image

May 28, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - That Lynn Davies.  Geez, he was something else, wasn’t he?

What’s that?  “Who’s Lynn Davies”, you ask?

Well, let me tell you. He’s the former British athlete who won gold at the 1964 Summer Olympic Games in Tokyo. Not ringin’ a bell for ya?

Okay. Lynn is a Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire.  He’s a stroke below being named an official “knight”.  Still not floatin’ your boat?

Alright. “Lynn the Leap” made the following statement many years ago. 

“There are hurdles to overcome in sport and in life.  Sport is a very valuable learning ground for how to live your life in the best possible way.”

“Big whoop”, you retort?  Well hold on a second there, Jeeves. This Lynn Davies is so - to borrow a most over-used phrase - “relevant” in today’s culture.

There is not one, single, solitary person who has ever lived or will ever live on this bountiful planet who has never been faced or will never face a hurdle.  And just to drive home good ‘ole Lynn’s point, we don’t mean those fixtures that sit on running tracks that hurt like the dickens if you clip one at high running speed.

I mean a real hurdle, like… oh… I dunno… like… well… human sexuality.

Yes. One of the greatest gifts our Creator has bestowed upon us lowly cretins is the high-to-heaven distinction of being a “playa-yo” in the mysterious act of creation. 

Two flesh. Becoming one. Oh, baby. Literally.

Oh yeah. The “hurdle” of human sexuality.

Okay. Let me flip the script on you for a sec. Now back to the world of actual hurdles. Yeah. The one Lolo Jones clipped back at the Beijing Games in 2008 which denied her that life-long dream of Olympic Gold.

I know. Many of you are asking, “who’s Lolo Jones”?  My response? Only a culture hero. That’s all. And it’s not for any gold medal she had placed around her neck in the sporting arena. In the arena of life, Ms. Jones made the most remarkable of statements in recent days. What was so mind-blowing that came from Lolo’s lips? She is saving herself for marriage.

The 29-year old hard-body with looks that kill, is a virgin. Ka. Boom.

On her decision to stay chaste, Jones called it “harder than training for the Olympics. Harder than studying for college, has been staying a virgin before marriage.”

Youth of today. If you’re reading this, and I know you are, take those words like the back of a body wash bottle. Open up those words.  Let it lather in your soul. Don’t apply liberally. Let the words wash over you… envelope you. Rinse. REPEAT.

Lolo Jones, in one fell swoop, hit the nail on the head. Holding back is hard. We know this, people. But moreover, it is possible. And don’t give me any of this garbage about some being pre-disposed to doing it better than others. We will have none of that nonsense.

Why?

Well let me turn your attention once again to Lolo Jones. The hero sans gold medal… sans silver spoon.

Lori, who would become “Lolo”, had about as tough an upbringing as one could possibly have. It’s one thing to be a woman on the move, but for a child to attend 8 schools in 8 years must have been harrowing. In a family of six, her mother held down two jobs to make ends meet. It’s because not only was Lolo’s dad absent, the man who was an alcoholic who spent much of his time in state prison. Where was home for the third-grader and her family? The basement of a Des Moines Salvation Army church. 

To go on would make your heart wrench with sadness. Yet, it is a most magnificent story. While having dinner with a great friend, Dr. Anthony Galea last week, the good doc told me that Lolo has intimated that she would like to accompany Galea to the Holy Land. After already making a couple of trips with Tony to Jerusalem, a third with this great woman would be an honour. 

You see, folks. This is no self-absorbed, stuck-up, “I’ll be in my trailer, ALONE”-type woman. Lolo Jones’ journey through life is a model. Especially to those young people who need to understand, with every fibre of their being, the old mantra - “when the going gets tough, the tough get going.”

About her decision to keep potential suitors at arm’s length, Jones goes on to say, “I’ve been tempted.  I’ve had guys tell me, ‘You know, if you have sex, it will help you run faster.” Ladies in the house. Can you feel her? I’m sure you do! I’m a man. I know she speaks the truth. How pathetic.

Over the weekend, Jones conducted an interview with E! News in which she was asked about all the “good-natured jabs about her recently revealed virginity.” But let’s be clear, my good people. There are those out there who are not at all amused by this most amazing declaration. After all, abortionists don’t want impressionable youth getting any weird, stupid ideas about ... ugh… chastity. 

The fact of the matter is, to some, Lolo Jones is an enemy merely for what she is standing for. And that is not only sexual preservation, but the most glorious institution of marriage! How old-fashioned. How new and exhilarating!

Is it possible that we, as a culture, might be in the nascent stages of a massive shift in how we look at ourselves as God sees us? As beautiful beings worthy of dignity, respect, and a love that can only be given and received as God does?  Geesh. I dunno. Heavy stuff, I’ll admit. I pray that we are making that move. 

But before I let you go, keep this in mind. Sports writer Kevin Armstrong of New York’s “Daily News” recently tweeted that several Jets players were chanting “Lolo, Lolo!” as another professed-virgin Tim Tebow entered the team’s locker room.

Lolo, who is quite adept at social media, saw the tweet and responded - “Hello by Lionel Richie is now on repeat on my ipod.” Hilarious. 

Lynn Davies? You said it, good ‘ole chap.

You said it, sir.

CLICK ‘LIKE’ IF YOU ARE PRO-LIFE!

Truth. Delivered daily.

Get FREE pro-life, pro-family news delivered straight to your inbox. 

Select Your Edition:


Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

PBS defends decision to air pro-abortion documentary ‘After Tiller’

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins

Under pressure for showing the pro-abortion documentary "After Tiller" on Labor Day, PBS' "POV" affiliate has defended the decision in response to an inquiry from LifeSiteNews.

The producers of the film say their goal with the documentary, which tells the stories of four late-term abortion doctors after the killing of infamous late-term abortionist George Tiller, is to "change public perception of third-trimester abortion providers by building a movement dedicated to supporting their right to work with a special focus on maintaining their safety.” 

POV told LifeSiteNews, "We do believe that 'After Tiller' adds another dimension to an issue that is being debated widely." Asked if POV will show a pro-life documentary, the organization said that it "does not have any other films currently scheduled on this issue. POV received almost 1000 film submissions each year through our annual call for entries and we welcome the opportunity to consider films with a range of points of view."

When asked whether POV was concerned about alienating its viewership -- since PBS received millions in federal tax dollars in 2012 and half of Americans identify as pro-life -- POV said, "The filmmakers would like the film to add to the discussion around these issues. Abortion is already a legal procedure."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

"This is an issue that people feel passionately about and will have a passionate response to. We are hopeful that the majority of people can see it for what it is, another lens on a very difficult issue." 

In addition to the documentary, POV has written materials for community leaders and teachers to share. A cursory examination of the 29-page document, which is available publicly, appears to include links to outside sources that defend Roe v. Wade, an examination of the constitutional right to privacy, and "a good explanation of the link between abortion law and the right to privacy," among other information.

Likewise, seven clips recommended for student viewing -- grades 11 and beyond -- include scenes where couples choose abortion because the children are disabled. Another shows pro-life advocates outside a doctor's child's school, and a third is described as showing "why [one of the film's doctors] chose to offer abortion services and includes descriptions of what can happen when abortion is illegal or unavailable, including stories of women who injured themselves when they tried to terminate their own pregnancies and children who were abused because they were unwanted."

Another clip "includes footage of protesters, as well as news coverage of a hearing in the Nebraska State Legislature in which abortion opponents make reference to the idea that a fetus feels pain." The clip's description fails to note that it is a scientifically proven fact that unborn children can feel pain.

The documentary is set to air on PBS at 10 p.m. Eastern on Labor Day.

Kirsten Andersen contributed to this article.

Advertisement
Featured Image
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

,

He defended ‘real’ marriage, and then was beheaded for it

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
By Pete Baklinski

A Christian man was executed during the night by a high-profile ruler after making an uncompromising defense of real marriage.

The Christian, who was renowned for his holiness, had told the ruler in public that his relationship with his partner was “against the law” of God. The Christian’s words enraged the ruler’s partner who successfully plotted to have him permanently silenced.

John the Baptist was first imprisoned before he was beheaded. The Catholic Church honors him today, August 29, as a martyr and saint.

While John’s death happened a little less than 2,000 years ago, his heroic stance for real marriage is more pertinent today than ever before.

According to the Gospel of Mark, the ruler Herod had ‘married’ his brother’s wife Herodias. When John told Herod with complete frankness, “It is against the law for you to have your brother’s wife,” Herodias became “furious” with him to the point of wanting him killed for his intolerance, bullying, and hate-speech.

Herodias found her opportunity to silence John by having her daughter please Herod during a dance at a party. Herod offered the girl anything she wanted. The daughter turned to her mother for advice, and Herodias said to ask for John’s head on a platter.

Those who fight for real marriage today can learn three important lessons from John’s example.

  1. Those proudly living in ungodly and unnatural relationships — often referred to in today’s sociopolitical sphere as ‘marriage’ — will despise those who tell them what they are doing is wrong. Real marriage defenders must expect opposition to their message from the highest levels.
  2. Despite facing opposition, John was not afraid to defend God’s plan for marriage in the public square, even holding a secular ruler accountable to this plan. John, following the third book of the Hebrew Bible (Leviticus 20:21), held that a man marrying the wife of his brother was an act of “impurity” and therefore abhorrent to God. Real marriage defenders must boldly proclaim today that God is the author of marriage, an institution he created to be a life-long union between one man and one woman from which children arise and in which they are best nurtured. Marriage can be nothing more, nothing less.
  3. John did not compromise on the truth of marriage as revealed by God, even to the point of suffering imprisonment and death for his unpopular position. Real marriage defenders must never compromise on the truth of marriage, even if the government, corporate North America, and the entire secular education system says otherwise. They must learn to recognize the new “Herodias” of today who despises those raising a voice against her lifestyle. They must stand their ground no matter what may come, no matter what the cost.

John the Baptist was not intolerant or a bigot, he simply lived the word of God without compromise, speaking the word of truth when it was needed, knowing that God’s way is always the best way. Were John alive today, he would be at the forefront of the grassroots movement opposing the social and political agenda to remake marriage in the image of man.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

If he were alive today he might speak simple but eloquent words such as, “It is against God’s law for two men or two women to be together as a husband and wife in marriage. Marriage can only be between a man and a woman.” 

He would most likely be hated. He would be ridiculed. He would surely have the human rights tribunals throwing the book at him. But he would be speaking the truth and have God as his ally. 

The time may not be far off when those who defend real marriage, like John, will be presented with the choice of following Caesar or making the ultimate sacrifice. May God grant his faithful the grace to persevere in whatever might come. St. John the Baptist, pray for us!

Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
The Wunderlich family Mike Donnelly / Home School Legal Defence Association
Thaddeus Baklinski Thaddeus Baklinski Follow Thaddeus

,

German homeschoolers regain custody of children, vow to stay and fight for freedom

Thaddeus Baklinski Thaddeus Baklinski Follow Thaddeus
By Thaddeus Baklinski

One year to the day since a team of 20 social workers, police officers, and special agents stormed a homeschooling family’s residence near Darmstadt, Germany, and forcibly removed all four of the family’s children, aged 7 to 14, a state appeals court has returned custody of the children to their parents.

The reason given for the removal was that parents Dirk and Petra Wunderlich continued to homeschool their children in defiance of a German ban on home education.

The children were returned three weeks after being taken, following an international outcry spearheaded by the Home School Legal Defense Association.

However, a lower court imposed the condition on the parents that their children were required to attend state schools in order for them to be released, and took legal custody of the children in order to prevent the family from leaving the country.

In a decision that was still highly critical of the parents and of homeschooling, the appeals court decided that the action of the lower court in putting the children in the custody of the state was “disproportional” and ordered complete custody returned to the parents, according to a statement by the HSLDA.

The Wunderlichs, who began homeschooling again when the court signaled it would rule this way, said they were very pleased with the result, but noted that the court’s harsh words about homeschooling indicated that their battle was far from over.

“We have won custody and we are glad about that,” Dirk said.

“The court said that taking our children away was not proportionate—only because the authorities should apply very high fines and criminal prosecution instead. But this decision upholds the absurd idea that homeschooling is child endangerment and an abuse of parental authority.”

The Wunderlichs are now free to emigrate to another country where homeschooling is legal, if they choose, but they said they intend to remain in Germany and work for educational freedom.

“While we no longer fear that our children will be taken away as long as we are living in Hessen, it can still happen to other people in Germany,” Dirk said. “Now we fear crushing fines up to $75,000 and jail. This should not be tolerated in a civilized country.”

Petra Wunderlich said, "We could not do this without the help of HSLDA,” but cautioned that, “No family can fight the powerful German state—it is too much, too expensive."

"If it were not for HSLDA and their support, I am afraid our children would still be in state custody. We are so grateful and thank all homeschoolers who have helped us by helping HSLDA.”

HSLDA’s Director for Global Outreach, Michael Donnelly, said he welcomed the ruling but was concerned about the court’s troubling language.

“We welcome this ruling that overturns what was an outrageous abuse of judicial power,” he said.

“The lower court decision to take away legal custody of the children essentially imprisoned the Wunderlich family in Germany. But this decision does not go far enough. The court has only grudgingly given back custody and has further signaled to local authorities that they should still go after the Wunderlichs with criminal charges or fines.”

Donnelly pointed out that such behavior in a democratic country is problematic.

“Imprisonment and fines for homeschooling are outside the bounds of what free societies that respect fundamental human rights should tolerate,” he explained.

“Freedom and fundamental human rights norms demand respect for parental decision making in education. Germany’s state and national policies that permit banning home education must be changed.

"Such policies from a leading European democracy not only threaten the rights of tens of thousands of German families but establish a dangerous example that other countries may be tempted to follow,” Donnelly warned.

HSLDA Chairman Michael Farris said that acting on behalf of the Wunderlichs was an important stand for freedom.

“The Wunderlichs are a good and decent family whose basic human rights were violated and are still threatened,” Farris said.

“Their fight is our fight," Farris stressed, "and we will continue to support those who stand against German policy banning homeschooling that violates international legal norms. Free people cannot tolerate such oppression and we will do whatever we can to fight for families like the Wunderlichs both here in the United States and abroad. We must stand up to this kind of persecution where it occurs or we risk seeing own freedom weakened.”

Visit the HSLDA website dedicated to helping the Wunderlich family and other German homeschoolers here.

Contact the German embassy in the U.S. here.

Contact the German embassy in Canada here.

Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook