Hilary White

A storm is gathering over Ireland’s green hills

Hilary White
Hilary White
Image

ROME, October 15, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The video here was sent along by email from contacts in Ireland fighting a massive propaganda campaign claiming that the country’s pro-life law is a threat to women’s health. Play it, and think about the battle that is happening right now in the land of saints and scholars. Ireland has been through a lot in the last few centuries, and the Irish have defied many long odds and survived, but the threat it is facing now is a foe that seems invincible. 

There’s a lot going on in Ireland, so much one might, if one were inclined to a conspiratorial mindset, be starting to wonder if all of this has been planned. Certainly our friends in Ireland are wondering it quite loudly. Ireland is one of the last 1st World nations that has held out against the abortionist mindset, against the incredible pressure of the international abortion lobby.

As such, the country has been a thorn in the side of a massive and immensely wealthy global coalition of organisations, seemingly impervious to any opposition and motivated by a totalitarian ideology that will not rest until it has the whole world in its grip. So far, the Irish, both north and south, have refused to bow and accept the killing of their children as the price of being considered part of the “modern” world.

But the resistance is flagging; particularly the Church has failed to hold the line, and the work of standing up to the abortionist bullies is left to a fierce and indomitable but tiny cadre of determined lay people. And no matter how determined, the pro-life people of Ireland do not themselves have the political power to wield, but can only try to persuade the politicians not to allow the country to go down the road taken by so many others.

I have watched developments in Ireland, the homeland of my ancestors, for several years now and, though I hate to say it, I have to agree with Liam Gibson from SPUC, who told me the other day that the situation seems very grim. The abortion juggernaut just keeps on coming, with seemingly unlimited funds, the support of nearly every international body from the UN to the World Health Organisation, the medical associations, the European Union…seemingly all the world’s wealthy and powerful. It is becoming difficult to imagine that anything could ever stop it, or any people hold out against it forever.

The first breach of Ireland’s pro-life defences came with the “X case,” in which abortion activists used a young pregnant girl, and manipulated a court decision in 1992 that said abortion could be allowed in cases where the “mother’s life was in danger” – even if that danger came from an hysterical threat of suicide from a 14-year-old girl. It took another 20 years, but abortion activists finally pushed forward to the next step, and, in 2010, the European Court of Human Rights ordered the Irish to rethink their law. If abortion can be allowed in some cases, the court said, it must be made clear exactly what those circumstances are. This was the opportunity the abortion-pushers in the national legislature had waited for so long. 

Now, the public is being inundated by messages from abortion groups like the Family Planning Association (affiliated, as so many of them are, with International Planned Parenthood) saying that the nasty old pro-life laws are a threat to women’s lives, that the Constitutional amendment of 1983 acknowledging the unborn as real people to be protected under the law, is standing in the way of women’s’ health care. And it’s a lie.

No doctor not motivated by the abortionist ideology would claim that an abortion accomplishes anything beneficial or healthful for a mother. But ignorance, the failure of the Church to step up over the last 40-odd years and unflinchingly tell the truth, and the ordinary, natural willingness of people to believe uncritically what they are told by anyone who looks like an authority, has eroded the public’s confidence in the law. A symposium of medical experts issued a statement a few weeks ago saying that abortion cures nothing, treats nothing and helps no one. It seems unlikely, however, that the message was heard beyond a tiny range.

CLICK ‘LIKE’ IF YOU ARE PRO-LIFE!

From the ECHR decision, the government set up an “expert group” who would “study” the law and give recommendations. This group, stacked with members of the abortion lobby, has deliberated behind closed doors and no submissions from anyone but their own “experts” was allowed. The country is waiting breathlessly for the report from this group to see which direction it will be taken.

We are now within only weeks, or perhaps days, of this report being made public, and suddenly, the shocking news came that Marie Stopes, one of the largest abortion organisations in the world (£145 million/year +) had brazenly defied the law of the province of Northern Ireland, and said it will open an abortion facility in Belfast on October 18th – three days from now.

The incredible arrogance of the act has so shocked Northern Ireland’s politicians that they have yet to respond. Pro-life people have told me that their political leaders, who have held out against the rest of the UK’s abortion-mania, simply do not know what to do. With an act of such breathtaking defiance and the giddy backing of the mainstream media, it is hard to imagine that it will be possible to prevent Marie Stopes from beginning the killing of unborn Irish.

Some of my ancestors came from a Northern Irish town called Ballymena, and others from the great ancient city of Limerick in the south. I have never lived in Ireland and did not even visit until two years ago, but I have been told all my life that I look Irish, and that I have many typical Irish character traits. When I went to visit, I looked around and was astonished to be in rooms full of people all of whom looked faintly familiar.

We’re a fighty race, and have never taken kindly to the many times in our history when we were oppressed and ruled by an alien power. And the abortionist ideology is probably the most alien of all, for a country so devoted to the family and the Faith. As a Catholic and a member of the world’s Irish diaspora, I know a little of the ancestral history: of the priests who gave catechism lessons to children behind hedges and said Mass on a stone in the middle of a field, with a man set as a lookout for the soldiers. Some of those priests were hanged. I know a little about how much the Irish are willing to do to fight evil when it comes to visit their land. I know they won’t ever stop fighing the evil that threatens it now.


Advertisement
Featured Image
A Nazi extermination camp. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

Imagine the outrage if anti-Semites were crowdsourcing for gas chambers

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
By Pete Baklinski
Image
A Nazi oven where the gassed victims were destroyed by fire. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews
Image
Empty canisters of the poison used by Nazis to exterminate the prisoners. Pete Baklinski / LifeSiteNews
Image
Syringe for Manual Vacuum Aspiration abortion AbortionInstruments.com
Image
Uterine Currette AbortionInstruments.com
Image

Imagine the outrage if the Nazis had used online crowdsourcing to pay for the instruments and equipment used to eradicate Jews, gypsies, the handicapped, and other population groups — labeled “undesirable” — in their large industrialized World War II extermination facilities. 

Imagine if they posted a plea online stating: “We need to raise $85,000 to buy Zyklon B gas, to maintain the gas chambers, and to provide a full range of services to complete the ‘final solution.’”

People would be more than outraged. They would be sickened, disgusted, horrified. Humanitarian organizations would fly into high gear to do everything in their power to stop what everyone would agree was madness. Governments would issue the strongest condemnations.

Civilized persons would agree: No class of persons should ever be targeted for extermination, no matter what the reason. Everyone would tear the euphemistic language of “final solution” to shreds, knowing that it really means the hideous crime of annihilating a class of people through clinical, efficient, and state-approved methods of destruction. 

But crowdsourcing to pay for the instruments and equipment to exterminate human beings is exactly what one group in New Brunswick is doing.

Reproductive Justice NB has just finished raising more than $100,000 to lease the Morgentaler abortion facility in Fredericton, NB, which is about to close over finances. They’re now asking the public for “support and enthusiasm” to move forward with what they call “phase 2” of their goal.

“For a further $85,000 we can potentially buy all the equipment currently located at the clinic; equipment that is required to provide a full range of reproductive health services,” the group states on its Facebook page.

But what are the instruments and equipment used in a surgical abortion to destroy the pre-born child? It depends how old the child is. 

A Manual Vacuum Aspiration abortion uses a syringe-like instrument that creates suction to break apart and suck the baby up. It’s used to abort a child from 6 weeks to 12 weeks of age. Abortionist Martin Haskell has said the baby’s heart is often still beating as it’s sucked down the tube into the collection jar.

For older babies up to 16 weeks there is the Dilation and Curettage (D&C) abortion method. A Uterine Currette has one sharp side for cutting the pre-born child into pieces. The other side is used to scrape the uterus to remove the placenta. The baby’s remains are often removed by a vacuum.

For babies past 16 weeks there is the Dilation and Evacuation (D&E) abortion method, which uses forceps to crush, grasp, and pull the baby’s body apart before extraction. If the baby’s head is too large, it must be crushed before it can be removed.

For babies past 20 weeks, there is the Dilation and Extraction (D&X) abortion method. Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist uses forceps to partially deliver the baby until his or her head becomes visible. With the head often too big to pass through the cervix, the abortionist punctures the skull, sucks out the brains to collapse the skull, and delivers the dead baby.

Other equipment employed to kill the pre-born would include chemicals such as Methotrexate, Misoprostol, and saline injections. Standard office equipment would include such items as a gynecologist chair, oxygen equipment, and a heart monitor.

“It’s a bargain we don’t want to miss but we need your help,” writes the abortion group.

People should be absolutely outraged that a group is raising funds to purchase the instruments of death used to destroy a class of people called the pre-born. Citizens and human rights activists should be demanding the organizers be brought to justice. Politicians should be issuing condemnations with the most hard-hitting language.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Everyone should be tearing to shreds the euphemistic language of “reproductive health services,” knowing that it in part stands for the hideous crime of annihilating a class of people through clinical, efficient, and state-approved methods of destruction that include dismemberment, decapitation, and disembowelment.

There’s a saying about people not being able to perceive the error of their day. This was generally true of many in Hitler’s Germany who uncritically subscribed to his eugenics-driven ideology in which certain people were viewed as sub-human. And it’s generally true of many in Canada today who uncritically subscribe to the ideology of ‘choice’ in which the pre-born are viewed as sub-human.

It’s time for all of us to wake-up and see the youngest members of the human family are being brutally exterminated by abortion. They need our help. We must stand up for them and end this injustice.

Let us arise!


Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Paul Wilson

The antidote to coercive population control

Paul Wilson
By Paul Wilson

The primary tenet of population control is simple: using contraception and abortifacients, families can “control” when their reproductive systems work and when they don’t – hence the endless cries that women “should have control over their own bodies” in the name of reproductive health.

However, in much of the world, the glittering rhetoric of fertility control gives way to the reality of control of the poorest citizens by their governments or large corporations. Governments and foreign aid organizations routinely foist contraception on women in developing countries. In many cases, any pretense of consent is steamrolled – men and women are forcibly sterilized by governments seeking to thin their citizens’ numbers.  (And this “helping women achieve their ‘ideal family size’” only goes one way – there is no government support for families that actually want more children.)

In countries where medical conditions are subpar and standards of care and oversight are low, the contraceptive chemicals population control proponents push have a plethora of nasty side effects – including permanent sterilization. So much for control over fertility; more accurately, the goal appears to be the elimination of fertility altogether.

There is a method for regulating fertility that doesn’t involve chemicals, cannot be co-opted or manipulated, and requires the mutual consent of the partners in order to work effectively. This method is Natural Family Planning (NFP).

Natural Family Planning is a method in which a woman tracks her natural indicators (such as her period, her temperature, cervical mucus, etc.) to identify when she is fertile. Having identified fertile days, couples can then choose whether or not to have sex during those days--abstaining if they wish to postpone pregnancy, or engaging in sex if pregnancy is desired.

Of course, the population control crowd, fixated on forcing the West’s vision of limitless bacchanalia through protective rubber and magical chemicals upon the rest of the world, loathes NFP. They deliberately confuse NFP with the older “rhythm method,” and cite statistics from the media’s favorite “research institute” (the Guttmacher Institute, named for a former director of Planned Parenthood) claiming that NFP has a 25% failure rate with “typical use.” Even the World Health Organization, in their several hundred page publication, “Family Planning: A Global Handbook for Providers,” admits that the basal body temperature method (a natural method) has a less than 1% failure rate—a success rate much higher than male condoms, female condoms, diaphragms, cervical caps or spermicides.

Ironically, the methods which they ignore – natural methods – grant true control over one’s fertility – helping couples both to avoid pregnancy or (horror of horrors!) to have children, with no government intervention required and no choices infringed upon.

The legitimacy of natural methods blows the cover on population controllers’ pretext to help women. Instead, it reveals their push for contraceptives and sterilizations for what they are—an attempt to control the fertility of others. 

Reprinted with permission from the Population Research Institute.


Advertisement
Featured Image
United Nations headquarters in New York Shutterstock.com
Rebecca Oas, Ph.D.

New development goals shut out abortion rights

Rebecca Oas, Ph.D.
By Rebecca Oas Ph.D.

Co-authored by Stefano Gennarini, J.D.

A two week marathon negotiation over the world’s development priorities through 2030 ended at U.N. headquarters on Saturday with abortion rights shut out once again.

When the co-chairs’ gavel finally fell Saturday afternoon to signal the adoption of a new set of development goals, delegates broke out in applause. The applause was more a sigh of relief that a final round of negotiations lasting twenty-eight hours had come to its end than a sign of approval for the new goals.

Last-minute changes and blanket assurances ushered the way for the chairman to present his version of the document delivered with an implicit “take it or leave it.”

Aside from familiar divisions between poor and wealthy countries, the proposed development agenda that delegates have mulled over for nearly two years remains unwieldy and unmarketable, with 17 goals and 169 targets on everything from ending poverty and hunger, to universal health coverage, economic development, and climate change.

Once again hotly contested social issues were responsible for keeping delegates up all night. The outcome was a compromise.

Abortion advocates were perhaps the most frustrated. They engaged in a multi-year lobbying campaign for new terminology to advance abortion rights, with little to show for their efforts. The new term “sexual and reproductive health and rights,” which has been associated with abortion on demand, as well as special new rights for individuals who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transsexual (LGBT), did not get traction, even with 58 countries expressing support.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Despite this notable omission, countries with laws protecting unborn children were disappointed at the continued use of the term “reproductive rights,” which is not in the Rio+20 agreement from 2012 that called for the new goals. The term is seen as inappropriate in an agenda about outcomes and results rather than normative changes on sensitive subjects.

Even so, “reproductive rights” is tempered by a reference to the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development, which recognizes that abortion is a matter to be dealt with in national legislation. It generally casts abortion in a bad light and does not recognize it as a right. The new terminology that failed was an attempt to leave the 1994 agreement behind in order to reframe abortion as a human rights issue.

Sexual and reproductive health was one of a handful of subjects that held up agreement in the final hours of negotiations. The failure to get the new terminology in the goals prompted the United States and European countries to insist on having a second target about sexual and reproductive health. They also failed to include “comprehensive sexuality education” in the goals because of concerns over sex education programs that emphasize risk reduction rather than risk avoidance.

The same countries failed to delete the only reference to “the family” in the whole document. Unable to insert any direct reference to LGBT rights at the United Nations, they are concentrating their efforts on diluting or eliminating the longstanding U.N. definition of the family. They argue “the family” is a “monolithic” term that excludes other households. Delegates from Mexico, Colombia and Peru, supporters of LGBT rights, asked that the only reference to the family be “suppressed.”

The proposed goals are not the final word on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). They will be submitted to the General Assembly, whose task is to elaborate a post-2015 development agenda to replace the Millennium Development Goals next year.

Reprinted with permission from C-FAM.org.


Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook