Ben Johnson

‘The Mob Doctor’ debuts with strong pro-abortion message

Ben Johnson
Ben Johnson

HOLLYWOOD, September 21, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com)—The Mob Doctor, the new medical drama on Fox, is such a derivative work I’m tempted to post a review of another program. The paint-by-numbers potboiler throws all Hollywood’s conventions into creating a thoroughly forgetful program unremarkable for anything – except its outspoken advocacy for abortion in its pilot episode.

The new series, which debuted this Monday, substitutes focus group-tested safety for creativity. Take a gusty heroine who is equal parts tenderhearted philanthropist and iron-fisted avenger; mix in medical issues; throw in a mafia plot line, sexual tension with a colleague, and an irritating mother who does not understand the joys of commitment-free sex. Then sandwich liberalism between pumping music and hazy-but-rapid scene transitions.

All that remains, in the words of The Simpsons, is to “be dangerous-but-warm and edgy-cute.”

Even the protagonist’s name, Grace Devlin, is an artificial construct – a little angel, a little devil. Get it?

The writers bring equal subtlety to their ham-fisted insertion of abortion propaganda into the pilot episode.

Devlin (Jordana Spiro) is a sympathetic character as a doctor who has offered her services to the mafia to save her brother’s life. This lends unearned credibility to her advice when she learns that one of her boyfriend’s patients is a family friend in trouble. Susie DeMarco, 14, is pregnant despite the fact that she and her boyfriend, Johnny, have never had sex. (“I’m not stupid,” she says.)

After learning she became a mother after having “outercourse”, Susie turns to her trusted friend in despair. “Grace, my dad is gonna kill Johnny,” she cries. “And I have a swimming scholarship next year to St. Catherine’s. If I’m knocked up, I lose it. What do I do?”

Having established Susie as a brilliant, hard-working, 14-year-old Catholic girl who hasn’t even had sex, the screenwriters reveal through Grace that “her dad works at the state penn”; “they don’t have a dollar to their name”; and “that scholarship is her one shot at making something out of her life.” To further reduce the audience’s objections Grace’s boyfriend, Dr. Brett Robinson (Zach Gilford), announces it is a ruptured ectopic pregnancy and the baby is “non-viable.”

The only problem left? Susie’s father has to sign a parental consent form.

The thought so enrages Grace’s sense of justice that she insists (she never suggests anything) that her boyfriend lie about the procedure, trick Mr. DeMarco into signing a form he has not read, then have another doctor falsify hospital records.

When Brett betrays the notion that he might have an independent will, Grace explodes that she must allow a 14-year-old middle school child to have an abortion behind her parents’ back.

“It gives her options, and you’re standing in her way,” she screams. “I don’t think you’re empathizing enough.”

(Click “like” if you want to end abortion! )

Eventually, Dr. Robinson goes through with the ruse, saving Susie from the backlash of a character who is presented as nothing other than a loving and devoted father.

The episode closes with a soliloquy about “choice” and the revelation that she was relieved to discover the corpse of her drunken, abusive father. “Finding him dead, it meant we were safe,” she said. Just the way a dead baby means Susie and Johnny are “safe,” presumably.

Thus did Hollywood try to stuff its opposition to parental consent laws down the nation’s collective throat, with a series of devices as tired as the rest of the series. The most sympathetic, angelic child will land on skid row if heartless, theocratic laws are enforced. Grace is a crusader and rescuer, trying to save her brother from a vicious mob boss who wants to kill him and a 14-year-old girl.

Only Brett seems to grasp the situation when he tells Grace, “You’re a bad influence.” Smiling suggestively, he said, “You’ll make it up to me.”

But who will make up 60 lost minutes to the viewer?

The episode might have one beneficial side effect its writers did not intend: It exposes the lies of Planned Parenthood and other pro-abortion organizations that vouch for the safety of “outercourse.”

Planned Parenthood – which has a vested interest in getting adolescents sexually active as early as possible – calls outercourse “safe, effective, and convenient,” as well as “a great method of birth control” that “has no side effects.” Four stars! To make the practice of near-sex more accessible yet, the website has a how-to section. 

The Association of Reproductive Health Professionals presents outercourse as virtually the equivalent of abstinence. “Both abstinence and outercourse are free, always available, and have no side effects,” the ARHP lies. “To prevent pregnancy and [sexually transmitted diseases], you must use abstinence or outercourse all of the time.”

The ARHP’s contention-by-silence that herpes or HPV cannot be transmitted through genital contact is novel, to say the least.

Both websites recount that bodily fluids may be exchanged during the process, carrying a reduced chance of pregnancy or infection, but both drown this significant qualification out with misleading, blanket statements like those above.

The episode’s saving, well, grace may be that it helped young people realize Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby are shameless liars. While Spiro said in an interview that her character possesses a certain “godliness,” this is not what she meant.

The show’s clumsy pro-abortion propaganda is but one of the numerous failings, coincidentally the one largely overlooked by critics. TV.com notes, “Grace comes off as a rather unlikeable hypocrite.” The Los Angeles Times calls the program “uncomfortable to watch.” Perhaps the best line belongs to Gail Pennington of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, who wrote, “‘The Mob Doctor’ is going to have to get lots better to be mediocre…it would take The Godfather to pull me back in.” 

These are but a handful of a plethora of negative reviews.

Even the series’ co-creator, Josh Berman admitted, “It almost sounds like we’re just trying to…marry two formulas to create one new formula.”

Lucky for him the only place more disconnected from reality than The Mob Boss is Hollywood, where Berman – who has a track record of failure for Fox – will doubtless be rewarded with more opportunities to lecture and bore the public. 

This series should swim with the fishes.

This article originally appeared on TheRightsWriter.com and is reprinted with permission.


Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Thaddeus Baklinski Thaddeus Baklinski Follow Thaddeus

Medical staff arrested in India after accidentally aborting baby at 8 months

Thaddeus Baklinski Thaddeus Baklinski Follow Thaddeus
By Thaddeus Baklinski

A doctor and a nurse at a prominent private hospital in India have been arrested after they allegedly administered abortion drugs to a eight-months pregnant accidentally, resulting in the death of her unborn child.

"We have immediately registered a case and arrested the doctor, whose negligent act has caused this," said South Jammu Superintendent of Police Rahul Malik, according to the Hindustan Times.

The woman's husband, Rakesh Sharma, told the paper that the doctor mistook Shruti Sharma for another patient who was scheduled for an abortion at the JK Medicity Hospital in Jammu on Friday afternoon.

Shruti had gone to the hospital after her gynecologist advised a routine medical examination to safeguard her and her baby's health.

Rakesh alleged that the doctor gave his wife the abortion pills without consulting her medical records. “Doctors and paramedical staff instead of administering glucose, gave her abortion medicine, which was actually meant for another patient,” he said.

"It is the worst case of negligence. I feel strongly that such hospitals should be closed. If this has happened to me today, tomorrow it can happen to any body else," Rakesh said.

While the JK Medicity's administration said it has launched an inquiry into the incident, a report from the Jagran Post stated that the district government has revoked the hospital's license.

"Jammu and Kashmir Government has ordered sealing of the private clinic after suspension of its license to operate in the wake of the incident," said Minister for Health and Medical Education Taj Mohiuddin according to the report.

National media have reported that the incident has brought illegal abortion practices in India to the attention of both the public and government officials.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

According to the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, abortion is legal in India up to 20 weeks. However, the opinion of a second doctor is required if the pregnancy is past its 12th week, and abortion-inducing drugs such as mifepristone and misoprostol are allowed only by prescription up until the seventh week of pregnancy.

Moreover, abortions can be performed only in government licensed medical institutions by registered abortionists.

Indian Express reported that the accused in the incident, Dr Amarjeet Singh, practices ayurvedic medicine (traditional Hindu medicine) and is "unsuitable for carrying out abortions."

A video posted by IndiaTV shows the parents surrounded by family members and relatives at a protest outside the JK Medicity hospital where the group is demanding punishment for those involved in the death of the child.


Advertisement
Featured Image
Queen James Bible
Kirsten Andersen Kirsten Andersen Follow Kirsten

,

News editor fired for criticizing ‘gay Bible’, files complaint

Kirsten Andersen Kirsten Andersen Follow Kirsten
By Kirsten Anderson

The former editor-in-chief of Iowa’s Newton Daily News has filed a religious discrimination complaint after he was fired over a post on his private blog criticizing the pro-gay Queen James Bible.

The Bible revision was produced by homosexual activists who claim to have edited the eight most commonly cited verses against homosexual behavior “in a way that makes homophobic interpretations impossible.”

On his private blog, which has since been deactivated, Bob Eschliman wrote in April that “the LGBTQXYZ crowd and the Gaystapo” are trying to reword the Bible “to make their sinful nature ‘right with God.’”

After public outcry from homosexual activists, Shaw Media, which owns the paper, fired him on May 6.

In a statement the day of his firing, Shaw Media President John Rung said Eschliman’s “airing of [his opinion] compromised the reputation of this newspaper and his ability to lead it.”

“There will be some who will criticize our action, and mistakenly cite Mr. Eschliman’s First Amendment rights as a reason he should continue on as editor of the Newton Daily News,” Rung said.  “As previously stated, he has a right to voice his opinion. And we have a right to select an editor who we believe best represents our company and best serves the interests of our readers.”

Rung said the company has a duty “to advocate for the communities we serve” and that “to be effective advocates, we must be able to represent the entire community fairly.”

Eschliman, who has been writing professionally since 1998 and became editor-in-chief of the Newton Daily News in 2012, says that the company was aware of his personal blog when he was hired and never indicated it would be a problem for him to continue sharing his personal political and religious views.

Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.

In his religious discrimination complaint against the company, filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), he says that he believes he was singled out for termination because of his Christian views concerning homosexuality and same-sex “marriage.”

“As a lifelong writer, I have maintained a personal blog on the Internet with some personal thoughts and writings,” Eschliman wrote. “Newton Daily News, my employer, never had a policy prohibiting personal blogging, Twitter, Facebook, or any other social media. In fact, my employer encouraged us to engage in social media on a personal level and I am aware of several employees of Newton Daily News who continue to blog and are still employed with Shaw Media.”

“There is no question that I was fired for holding and talking about my sincerely held religious beliefs on my personal blog during my off-duty time from the comfort of my own home,” Eschliman wrote. “Shaw Media directly discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs and my identity as an evangelical Christian who believes in Holy Scripture and the Biblical view of marriage.

“Moreover, Shaw Media announced that not only were they firing me based upon my religious beliefs, but that they would not hire or allow anyone to work at Shaw Media who holds religious beliefs similar to mine, which would include an automatic denial of any accommodation of those who share my sincerely held religious beliefs,” he added.

Neither Shaw Media nor the Newton Daily News have been willing to provide further comment to the press on the matter, citing pending litigation.

Matthew Whitaker, an attorney with Liberty Institute who is assisting Eschliman with his complaint, said the law is on his client’s side.

“No one should be fired for simply expressing his religious beliefs,” Whitaker said in a statement. “In America, it is against the law to fire an employee for expressing a religious belief in public.  This kind of religious intolerance by an employer has no place in today’s welcoming workforce.”

According to Whitaker, if the EEOC rules in Eschliman’s favor, Shaw Media could be forced to give him back pay, front pay, and a monetary settlement.


Advertisement
Featured Image
Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon

If you find this filthy book in your home, burn it

Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon
By Jonathon van Maren

I don’t believe in book-burnings, but for the 50 Shades of Grey Trilogy, I’ll make an exception. I prefer charred books to scarred people.

The 50 Shades of Grey Trilogy, for those of you living outside “civilization,” is a repulsive and poisonous stack of porn novels that celebrates the seduction and manipulation of an insecure girl by a powerful businessman who happens to like spending his recreational time engaging in what is now popularly known as “BDSM.” For those of you who are fortunate enough never to have heard of this glorification of sexual assault, the acronym stands for bondage, domination, sadism, and masochism. In 50 Shades of Grey, the man in question inflicts all sorts of pain on the girl, because he is a sadist, which used to be a bad thing. (How utterly confusing it is to see the “feminists” of Planned Parenthood and elsewhere celebrating this phenomenon—wasn’t domination something they sought to subvert? Didn’t bondage used to be something one wanted to be freed from? And sado-masochism—I could vomit.) And now this trash has been developed into a film, the trailer of which is all over Facebook.

50 Shades of Grey and the new “BDSM” phenomenon are nothing more than the celebration of pain, rape, and destruction.

A lot of people seem to be taken with these books, especially based on the number of people I’ve seen unashamedly reading it at airports. These porn novels are “hot,” many reviewers tell us confidently. Yes, hot as Hell and halfway there, I think.

Consider this, for just a moment: In a culture where broken families are often the norm, we have a generation of girls often growing up without fathers, never receiving the paternal love and affection that they need. Thus the famous “Daddy Issues” that so many comedy sitcoms repulsively mock, as if hurting girls seeking love and affection in all the wrong places is some sort of joke. Conversely, boys are also growing up without fathers, never having a positive male role model in the home to teach them how to treat women with love and respect. And what is teaching them how to treat girls? At an enormous rate, the answer is online pornography, which increasingly features vicious violence against girls and women. The average first exposure of boys to pornography is age eleven. It is an absolutely toxic mess—insecure and hurting girls seek love from boys who have been taught how to treat them by the most vicious of pornography.

Introduce into this situation a book, written by a woman, glorifying the idea that girls should expect or even enjoy pain and torture inside of a sexual relationship. How does a girl, insecure and unsure, know what to think? The culture around her now expects her not to need a safe relationship, but a “safe word” to employ in case her sadist partner gets a bit too carried away in the pain-making. Boys who might never have dreamed of asking a girl to subject herself to such pain and humiliation are now of course emboldened to request or even expect this fetishized sexual assault as a matter of course in a relationship. After all, much of pornography now features this degradation of girls and women, and a woman wrote a book celebrating such things. It might seem sadistic and rapey, but hey, sexual freedom has allowed us to celebrate “bondage” and sexual liberation has allowed us to liberate our darkest demons from the recesses of our skulls and allow them out to play in the bedroom. Boys used to get taught that they shouldn’t hit girls, but now the culture is telling them that it’s actually a turn-on.

I genuinely feel sorry for many teenage girls trying to navigate the new, pornified dating landscape. I genuinely feel sorry for the legions of fatherless boys, exposed to pornography before they even had a chance to realize what it was, enfolded by the tentacles of perverted sexual material before they even realize what, exactly, they are trifling with. It brings to mind something C.S. Lewis once wrote: “Wouldn't it be dreadful if some day in our own world, at home, men start going wild inside, like the animals here, and still look like men, so that you'd never know which were which.”

50 Shades of Grey and the new “BDSM” phenomenon are nothing more than the celebration of pain, rape, and destruction. Find out if the “sex educators” in your area are pushing this garbage, and speak out. Join campaigns to make sure that promotion of this filth isn’t being funded by your tax dollars. And if you find these books in your home, burn them.


Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook