“If even one Member of this House refuses to consent to this essential principle of democratic governance it will be a dark and dangerous day for Canada,” says Woodworth.
"I frankly don't understand why the judge elected to pass on a discussion of some of the very real concerns our research raised," Regnerus told LifeSiteNews.com.
At the center of the controversy was a disagreement over whether pro-lifers can support otherwise pro-life legislation that includes rape and incest exceptions.
'Anyone who does not receive the Eucharist worthily, that is if they are in a state of sin, blasphemes the body and blood of the Lord,' Archbishop Cordileone told LifeSiteNews last week.