Analysis

Is the media starting to program voters for a steal of the 2024 presidential election?

The state of Pennsylvania and the New York Times have told the public not to expect the final results until the day after the election.

Stephen
Kokx
Stephen Kokx
Comments 
9

(LifeSiteNews) — Until 2020, the American people knew who its commander in chief was going to be on the night the presidential election took place.

As midnight on November 3 in that infamous year drew to a close, Donald Trump held massive leads in all of the major battleground states – Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin, among others.


I distinctly recall going to bed that evening more confident than ever that when I would wake up, Trump was going to be re-elected in a landslide.

Of course, that did not happen – or so the media told us.

Among the many anomalies that occurred in that shameful election, the huge uptick in voting is perhaps the most obvious.

In total, Trump received (allegedly) 74 million votes, an 11 million increase from what he received in 2016. His opponent, Joe Biden – who could barely attract a hundred people as his campaign rallies – reportedly obtained 81 million votes, a whopping 15 million more than Hillary Clinton just four years earlier.

That 26 million vote increase was the largest ever over a four-year span in a presidential race.

There are other oddities that occurred in 2020 as well; we need not go into all of them. LifeSite has already exposed the total lack of transparency at voting stations and coup-like behavior by the corporate media that took place on that dark fall night four years ago.

One concern that has repeatedly been brought up in conversations I’ve had with friends and political observers is that the same people who orchestrated the steal of the 2020 race are planning on doing the same thing in 2024. I always thought that those concerns were valid.

There are currently 48 days until election day. Based on what the media has been doing lately, it certainly looks like they are preparing voters for a repeat of what happened last time.

All eyes on Pennsylvania

On August 8, the state of Pennsylvania published several X posts informing residents that it is likely there won’t be a clear winner on election night.

“Pennsylvanians won’t always know the final results of all races on election night. Any changes in results that occur as counties continue to count ballots are not evidence that an election is ‘rigged.’ See the full explanation at https://vote.pa.gov/FactCheck,” the state said.


These posts are a clear attempt to get ahead of any claims that Donald Trump might make about the lack of integrity in a state led by Democratic Gov. Josh Shapiro, who was passed over by Harris as her running mate.

The New York Times has also started programming voters with arguments that could be used to cover up election-stealing schemes.

In an article published September 13, reporter Nick Corasaniti argues that it is increasingly likely that “there will be no clear and immediate winner on election night and that early returns could give a false impression of who will ultimately prevail”


Liberal website Axios has trumpeted that narrative as well.

“Four years after then-President Trump seized on expected ballot-counting delays in Pennsylvania and other swing states to fuel false claims that the election was stolen, experts warn it could happen again,” an article titled “Why Pennsylvania may experience 2020 election déjà vu in 2024” reads.

Other outlets have suggested similar scenarios could unfold in places like swing state Michigan, too.

Fortunately, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court just invalidated a lower court decision by ruling that mail-in ballots that do not have a date or have an incorrect one will not be counted on election day.

Michael Whatley, chairman of the Republican National Committee, which supported the lawsuit, applauded the decision on X.

“This makes mail voting in the Keystone State less susceptible to fraud,” he said. “We will keep fighting and winning!”


True to its name as the Keystone State, Pennsylvania, more than any other state, will determine who wins this year’s presidential race.

Without its 19 Electoral College votes, Trump will have to not only thread the needle by winning Republican-leaning states like North Carolina and Georgia, but he’d also have to pick up Arizona and Nevada, which he lost last time. And even then, he’d only be at 268. He’d still have win a traditional Democratic state like New Hampshire (four Electoral College votes), Wisconsin (10), or Michigan (15). But with Pennsylvania in his column, all Trump has to do is keep North Carolina and Georgia and he’s at the magic number of 270.

My prediction is that no matter how much Trump might be ahead on election night in Pennsylvania, it will be the very last state to provide its results. And like the media says, we won’t have a winner until the afternoon of Wednesday, November 6. For a country that calls itself the world’s leading defender of democracy,” the United States is as hypocritical as it can get when it comes to its own elections.

9 Comments

    Loading...