Canadians: Send an urgent message to legislators urging them to stop Trudeau’s ‘Online Harms Act’
(LifeSiteNews) — Americans have reacted with shock to the news from Britain that members of the public have been handed prison sentences of over three years for making comments considered “misinformation” on X, formerly Twitter. Last week, U.K. police threatened to extradite Americans for violating its increasingly draconian online speech laws.
One recent conviction cited “anti-establishment rhetoric” as reason for imprisonment. That is, public disagreement with the liberal-global state is now a crime in the U.K. Wayne O’Rourke was imprisoned for three years for tweeting in support of a protest against the murder of three girls in Southport, England.
Now, new police powers and surveillance measures are being introduced which will expand facial recognition and even abolish private messaging altogether, making the encryption of communications through apps like WhatsApp, Signal, Wire, and over email illegal.
Soon, in Big Brother Britain, you will see people also imprisoned for private conversations which no one else has seen but the police state.
A report by Big Brother Watch, whose mission is “Reclaiming Privacy, Defending Freedom,” warns of the escalation of “Britain’s War on Free Speech.”
In a video released on August 16, Mark Johnson warns that new measures are coming in to monitor, censor and criminalize speech in the U.K., including an effort to illegalize encryption, which would permanently remove privacy from any messages sent on any platform.
Alongside existing powers being introduced under the Online Safety Act, measures were announced as part of the Starmer government response to the unrest caused by the stabbing of three girls to death by a Rwandan man, described as “Welsh.”
Yet further measures are also underway to redefine everything from “transphobia” to political dissent – as “terrorism.”
Sky News trailered the New War on Terrorism on August 18 with this message from the Home Office:
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has promised to crack down on people ‘pushing harmful and hateful beliefs’ and ‘kickstart’ a new approach to fighting extremism in the wake of riots that broke out across the UK earlier this month.
Cooper added:
Hateful incitement of all kinds fractures and frays the very fabric of our communities and our democracy.
The pro-abortion Home Secretary has announced that what the liberal-global state used to consider “hate speech” is now equated with “terrorism.” Cooper has been calling for the banning of pro-life prayer outside abortion centres for almost a decade. Now she wants schoolchildren to report each other for saying things she considers to be extreme.
What does this “terrorism” include?
If you are pro-life, then this definition includes you. In March 2024, the uniparty U.K. government announced its renewed training to combat extremism leading to terrorism. Called “Prevent,” it is a form of obligatory political radicalization marketed as the prevention of dangerous extremism.
It identifies anti-abortionists as future terrorists. As it says, terrorism comes from “extremist narratives.” Where do they come from?
Narratives are likely to come from those who seek to change a specific policy or practice, as opposed to replacing the whole economic, political or social system.
Examples include, animal rights, anti-abortion or anti-fascism. Single-issue narratives can be politically agnostic, meaning they may be neither right nor left aligned.
If you think the political system should be changed, you are a potential terrorist. If you insist on praying outside abortion centers, be advised the U.K. government is now considering a new law against “prayer crime.”
If you think that the Christian civilization of the West is not a myth which should go between sneering scare quotes and you would like to preserve it, you are a likely source of terrorism. As the Prevent guidance reads, you are a threat if you think that “’Western culture’ is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration by certain ethnic and cultural groups.”
If you are concerned about the obvious, you are a potential terrorist. Noticing reality makes you a terror threat. Against open borders? Terrorist.
Prevent Duty Training is obligatory for all police, doctors, nurses, local officials, and people in the so-called justice system. Its aim is to prevent radicalization leading to terrorism.
Despite being in place for almost 10 years, Prevent has not helped to prevent the many terror attacks which have killed children and members of the public since then.
Real terrorists such as Salman Abedi – who bombed the Manchester Arena in 2017 killing 22 men, women, and children – are often known to police before they strike. As a BBC report noted weeks after the bombing:
A community support worker, who did not wish to be named, said they contacted the authorities after [Abedi] publicly said ‘he was supporting terrorism’ and ‘being a suicide bomber is OK.’
Abedi used to travel to Libya in the school holidays to fight with radical Islamist militias alongside his father. Schoolmates say they reported Abedi – twice – to anti-terrorism police. Abedi’s brother remained free to go to Libya and fight with ISIS. Prevent was “unaware” of Abedi.
Survivors are now suing MI5, the U.K.’s security and intelligence service, for its abject failure to take action against an obvious threat that left hundreds with life-changing injuries, alongside the dead.
With terrorists openly declaring their intentions, and escaping any police attention despite their being informed of it, it is clear that the liberal-global state is, as usual, looking at anything but the real cause of the problems in our society. It prosecutes people opposed to the liberal-global agenda and its downstream effects. It will never admit the cause of the problem – itself.
Abedi was fighting in a war started in 2011 by Hillary Clinton and then-U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron in Libya. The collapse of that state opened the floodgates of migration into Britain and the West from Africa. The reason the liberal-global state will neither notice nor fix the problems is because their own policies have created them.
Instead, it is now looking for “terrorism” in our text messages. What else does that mean?
“Antisemitism” is a red flag, of course, whose definition may seem obvious (it is used to silence legitimate criticism of Israel). Yet recent U.K. government guidance links mRNA “vaccine” resistance, opposition to lockdowns and to the New World Order, talk about a “Great Replacement,” and even calls for peace in Ukraine to “antisemitism.”
Anything “anti-establishment” is also a sign of potential terrorist sympathies. What does this “establishment” identify as? Of course, it sees “anti-LGBTQ+ grievances” as a precursor to terrorism as well, because the establishment is Zionist, pro-permanent war, promotes “safe and effective” so-called “vaccines,” enforces lockdowns, and relentlessly pushes abortion and hypersexualized lifestyles which do not produce children, but which often involve them in disturbing ways.
If you are against this, you are seen as a terrorist threat in waiting. So in Britain the law is coming for your private conversations, between you and your friends and your family, to see whether you too are a terrorist. All you have to do to become a “terror threat” is say the wrong words.
These are blasphemy laws forbidding disagreement with the liberal-global agenda of digital tyranny.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, whose Home Office is responsible for policing in the U.K., has also spoken of a new terrorist offence of “extreme misogyny.”
Again, this appears to be about one reality but in fact describes another.
“Misogyny” is the hatred of women. Remember that when they say “women” they do not mean what you do.
Cooper’s own son is a “trans rights activist” and drag queen. Joel Cooper performed as “Ms. Vanity Vengeance.” In 2022, he led the LGBT group Warwick Pride in a “trans rights disruption” of the visit of then U.K. Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawhi.
The action was undertaken in furious response to the claim that a woman is “an adult human female,” as Zahawhi had previously stated.
When Yvette Cooper says that “extreme misogyny” is a terror offence, she is talking about offending men dressed as women, like her son.
This definition of “terrorism” is not legalese – but “tranese” – the transitioning of meaning in defense of an ideology of moral inversion. Statements of the obvious are now crimes against the state.
If we are to state the obvious we should make the argument against this liberal-in-name-only police state.
The actions of our governments for the past 30 years have been one long campaign of terrorism on our nations, people, religion, culture, and traditions, helping to kill and displace millions abroad.
The liberal-global state is omnicidal, killing everything. It annihilates the meaning of words as well as that of life, and it calls the Gospel “hate speech.” The principle that “LGBTQ rights must trump religious feeling” was first announced in the U.K. Parliament in 2018.
READ: UK politician arrested for ‘hate crime’ after defending expression of Christian beliefs
It is now designating critics of the chaos it has made as terrorists, blaming the victims of its disastrous policies for daring to disagree with diabolism and destruction by design. This is neither justice nor liberal. As the liberal-global order becomes more extreme in its abuse of state power, and as these effects degrade our lives into a permanent state of emergency, all it can do is make things worse.
It is doing this now by designating disagreement as terror. This is because its assault on the Christian civilization it hates cannot be defended in a reasonable argument.
If you question the fairy tales the government tells you, you are a terrorist. This is what has happened to the birthplace of parliamentary democracy. It is now an act of insurrection to speak for life, for the truth, for a better world than degradation and the industries of death which seeks to make everyone Godless, homeless, everywhere, forever, in a pointless life of shopping for trash surrounded by strangers. If you say the wrong words, even in private, you have no rights.
Where the truth is, there is God. There is no sign of either in our post-sane police state.
Canadians: Send an urgent message to legislators urging them to stop Trudeau’s ‘Online Harms Act’