The Democrats — who are usually so quick to lecture others on following 'the science' — have apparently not kept up with the science on sexual orientation.
Moving away from the limited definition of families as being formed by marriage, biology, or adoption is a move in the direction of the further deconstruction of the family as an institution.
The paper is not a 'surrender,' but the exact opposite -- a clear declaration of our intention to engage actively in the debate over this issue and offer an alternative path to the leftist social agenda that only harms those struggling with gender dysphoria.
The Southern Poverty Law Center is arguing that to claim sexual orientation is changeable and that counseling can help effect such change is inherently fraudulent.
Whatever satisfaction some may gain from a same-sex relationship, it can never be a 'marriage' -- because marriage, by definition, is the union of a man and a woman.
Research shows children raised by their married, biological mother and father have, on average, better life outcomes than children from other family structures.
The Supreme Court cannot -- it must not -- make its decisions on constitutional claims based on what the Justices (or anyone else) prefers as public policy.
The historic 2014 elections for the Senate demonstrate that supporting the redefinition of marriage and the rest of the pro-homosexual agenda is a loser, and opposing it is a winner, across the country—especially for Republican candidates.