Blogs
Featured Image
R. KellyShutterstock

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

(LifeSiteNews) – There’s a reason that the abortion industry constantly uses slogans such as “no uterus, no opinion” — it’s to shut pro-life men up. They are, after all, happy to receive the support of pro-choice men, and are not above asking for it when they deem it convenient. When they say men should keep their mouths shut on this issue, they really mean those men who seek to stand up for pre-born children. Those men hurt their bottom line, and when women get fewer abortions, they make less money. 

It has often been my contention that the abortion debate needs more men, not less. If every man who got a woman pregnant swore to stand up for her and the child and support them through thick and thin, I believe the abortion rate would plummet overnight. Many women have abortions under pressure from bad men — the sort of men who need abortion to escape the consequences of their lifestyles. Abortion isn’t about a woman’s right to choose for them — it is about their right to choose. They want women to be sexually available to them without having children. 

To cite one example, NHL forward Evander Kane, who plays for the San Jose Sharks, is in court after being sued by former partner Hope Parker. Kane allegedly agreed to pay her $2 million to abort a baby they conceived together but changed his mind about the amount just before she gave him proof that she’d carried through. Allegedly, Kane’s two other children with Parker had also been aborted, with the hockey player paying her $125,000 to get the second abortion. For the third, Parker held out for millions. It would be a very expensive hit job, but the child’s father had promised to pay the mother to have the child killed. 

What an awful world this is for children in the womb. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Tell University of Pittsburgh to stop barbaric experiments using human babies
  Show Petition Text
7860 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 9000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

CAUTION: Some material below is by its nature disturbing and graphic.

The University of Pittsburgh (Pitt) is involved in barbaric experimentation using aborted baby body parts which are, by the university's own admission, obtained by their abortionist partners, Planned Parenthood, from babies who are still alive when the organs are "harvested."

What happens at Pitt after the aborted baby body parts are obtained is equally as gruesome. Just this May, it was revealed that in one experiment, Pitt was grafting aborted baby scalps onto lab rats to see if baby hair would continue to grow.

This depraved butchery must stop!

SIGN and SHARE this petition which calls on the Chancellor of the University of Pittsburgh and the Board of Trustees to call an immediate halt to this appalling experimentation using preborn human beings.

Of course, all abortion is barbaric and wrong, but this is downright ghoulish!

But, to make matters even worse, some of this experimentation is paid for, in part, by your taxpayer dollars, in the form of NIH grants. And believe it or not, some of the grants even specify racial quotas of aborted baby parts for this grisly butchery.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to the University of Pittsburgh Chancellor, Patrick Gallagher, and to the Pitt Board of Trustees demanding that they put a stop to this ghastly experimentation.

At the same time, we will also CC this petition to the leadership of Pennsylvania State Legislature, urging them to do everything they can, including defunding (to the extent possible) any university departments involved in experimentation on aborted babies.

NB: You do not need to be from Pennsylvania to sign and share this petition. The University of Pittsburgh is a national leader in medical research and in receipt of millions of dollars in federal tax dollars, thereby necessitating a huge response from pro-lifers around the country!

After signing the petition, you might consider contacting the Pitt Board of Trustees directly to politely, but firmly, tell them to put a stop to this kind of barbarism masquerading as "scientific" inquiry.

The Board's direct phone number: 412-624-6623

The Board's email: [email protected]

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'University of Pittsburgh’s organ harvesting practices include racial quotas for minority babies' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/university-of-pittsburghs-organ-harvesting-practices-include-racial-quotas-for-minority-babies/

WATCH CMP's YouTube video: 'Government-Sponsored Fetal Experimentation at the University of Pittsburgh and Planned Parenthood'

Photo Credit: CMP YouTube / screenshot

  Hide Petition Text

Those aren’t the only abortion accusations in the news this week, either. At the sex-trafficking trial of singer R. Kelly, accuser Jane Doe No 5 said the singer attempted to control every aspect of her life from age 17 and punished her if she did not obey him. This constituted physical abuse every two or three days; the singer infected her with herpes; and when she became pregnant with their child in 2017, Kelly pushed her to get an abortion. “He said, ‘You need to look into that abortion stuff because you need to keep that body,’” she told the court.  

Abortions in the celebrity world are not uncommon; some men even demand that women sign “abortion contracts” so that any children who come into the world will promptly exit it through the suction aspirator of an abortionist. Men use women; women use men; children die, victims of the cruel sexual war games their parents play.  

In the midst of all of this, the abortion industry informs any man who wishes to protect his pre-born child to close his mouth and support abortion. So many women are desperate for men to stand up and be men; so many women would choose life if they had the support to do so. In a culture where abortion is normal and casual sex expected, a generation of men standing up for their own offspring would constitute a tremendous and welcome cultural shift. The abortion industry, of course, doesn’t want that. They prefer a world filled with Evander Kanes and R. Kellys. 

Men like that make them money. Blood money, yes. But money. 

Featured Image

Jonathon Van Maren is a public speaker, writer, and pro-life activist. His commentary has been translated into more than eight languages and published widely online as well as print newspapers such as the Jewish Independent, the National Post, the Hamilton Spectator and others. He has received an award for combating anti-Semitism in print from the Jewish organization B’nai Brith. His commentary has been featured on CTV Primetime, Global News, EWTN, and the CBC as well as dozens of radio stations and news outlets in Canada and the United States.

He speaks on a wide variety of cultural topics across North America at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions. Some of these topics include abortion, pornography, the Sexual Revolution, and euthanasia. Jonathon holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in history from Simon Fraser University, and is the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.

Jonathon’s first book, The Culture War, was released in 2016.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.