Featured Image

(LifeSiteNews) — In the Australia that existed before Covid-19, doctors could be trusted to regard their relationship with patients as strictly private and confidential. It was considered a cornerstone of professional integrity.  

That Australia is no longer in evidence. When it comes to the so-called vaccines, privacy is no longer thought worth protecting in the work force, when attending cafes or restaurants, or when attending a doctor’s surgery. Many general practitioners will not even treat patients in person unless they have been inoculated. Some hospitals force unjabbed relatives to stay outside.  

There were supposed to be legal protections. The Federal Privacy Act says health information is considered “one of the most sensitive types of personal information … [requiring] extra protections around its handling.” There were supposed to be professional standards. The Australian Medical Association states that “privacy protection and confidentiality of health information is essential for quality health care.” There is even an amendment to the Constitution – something that is very rarely successful – which implies the importance of protecting the doctor-patient relationship. 

So, what happened? An important presentation by the former barrister Julian Gillespie to a Federal cross-party committee has revealed how bureaucratic sleight of hand and political deception were used to blackmail doctors into giving up the most basic principles of their profession: the protection of their patients’ right to confidentiality, the right to informed consent, and the imperative to provide personalised medicine.  



Doctors have become more of a menace to patients than a protector of their interests, at least when it comes to the so-called vaccines. If any well-informed patient wants to discuss the risks of what is effectively participating in a trial of an untested drug, doctors will give them very short shrift, often becoming very aggressive. 

Doctors are scared. The reason, as Gillespie explained, becomes clear in a position statement delivered by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) on March 9, 2021 which “effectively [places a] jackboot on informed consent, snuffing out that legal right within this country – and indeed they put their jackboot on the sanctity of the patient-doctor relationship. If a medical doctor with years of experience began to question the efficacy or safety of these drugs, by that position statement they were immediately to be referred to as an anti-vaxxer or an individual providing misinformation, having no regard to their expertise.”  

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Pray that Hungary passes child protection referendum (against LGBT propaganda)
  Show Petition Text
2350 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 2500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

On April 3rd, Hungarians will go to the polls to decide whether to re-elect Prime Minister Viktor Orban and his Fidesz-Chrisitan Democrat (KDNP) coalition or to elect a coalition of leftist parties, now led by a wayward "Catholic," Peter Marki-Zay, who says he would allow homosexual "marriage."

On the same day, the country will decide whether or not to approve a momentous child protection law, already passed by parliament, which would protect children from being sexualized by LGBT propaganda in schools and by pornography in the mass media.

Please SIGN and PLEDGE to pray that Hungary will vote to protect its children against the onslaught of LGBT indoctrination propaganda and pornography.

Since passage of the bill, the fake news outlets from Europe to America have predictably lied about the contents of the bill, and attempted to manufacture outrage about the same. And, the corrupt European Union also joined the attack on Hungary's efforts to protect children.

But now, the Hungarian people will have their say. And, they need our prayerful support.

Please SIGN and PLEDGE to pray that Hungary will vote to protect its children against the onslaught of LGBT indoctrination propaganda and pornography.

The law specifically prohibits showing pornographic material or content portraying homosexuality or transgenderism to minors under the age of 18. Other measures include a registry of sex offenders, regulations on sexual education, and stronger policies against child pornography.

Who could be against these proactive, common sense measures to protect the innocence of children?

Peter Marki-Zay, and the left-liberal bloc he heads, is against the law, and has said that his leftist coalition will "immediately repeal this terrible act," if elected in April.

But, thankfully, the vast majority of Hungarians actually support the law.

In a recent survey, 69% of Hungarians said they disagreed with Marki-Zay when asked if the Child Protection Act should be repealed.

Now, let's provide the prayerful support Hungarians need, and beg the Lord to inspire them to get out and vote to protect their children.

Please SIGN and PLEDGE to pray that Hungary will vote to protect its children against the onslaught of LGBT indoctrination propaganda and pornography.

Thank you!


'Hungary announces referendum on law against LGBT promotion, pedophilia' -

'Top EU court rules Hungary, Poland can be stripped of funding for opposing ‘LGBT’ agenda' -

'The majority of Hungarians oppose Péter Márki-Zay’s plan to repeal the Child Protection Act' -

'Hungary passes law against homosexuality, prime minister renews vow to ‘protect our children’' -

'Hungary bans promotion of homosexuality, transgenderism to minors' -

'EU to take legal action against Hungary’s anti-pedophilia bill' -

**Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

Who are the people issuing these brutal edicts? According to Gillespie, the board of AHPRA is composed of two social workers, one educator, one accountant, one physiotherapist, one psychiatrist, one mathematician, and three lawyers. There are no scientists and no medicos, and yet they are making scientific and medical pronouncements.

“They saw fit to tell every qualified doctor in this country that if you don’t toe the government line we would deregister you, suspend you, or place conditions on your practice,” Gillespie said. 

AHPRA was created through a little-known agreement between the federal, state and territory governments. It is completely unaccountable, beyond the reach of both the Federal parliament and judicial review. When AHPRA was asked, through a Freedom of Information request, to provide its reasoning for strong-arming doctors, the reply was that it was not a commonwealth agency, and so did not have to.  

It gets worse. The prime minister, Scott Morrison, is fond of implying that he is against mandates, which he described as un-Australian. But he has suggested that his hands were tied because state governments were in charge of health. He is lying. Gillespie points out that the Federal government was behind everything done by the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC), which is the only body that can affect AHPRA.

“People aren’t aware that the Federal government was responsible for the state and territory-based mandates, social distancing rules, masking rules, contact tracing, quarantining, and isolation rules because it was run by the AHPPC,” Gillespie stated.  

The Federal government handed out a massive $7 billion to state governments so they could implement the appalling and ineffective mandates of the last two years.

“Premiers ran back to their states and territories and started to implement as many items as they could. They knew the science but instead wanted to take the cash that Morrison was offering them,” Gillespie declared.  

The has been little independent assessment and thinking in Australia. Authorities have instead slavishly followed the often contradictory, and certainly unreliable, dictates from the World Health Organisation and other bodies like America’s Food and Drug Administration.  

That is bad enough, but there has also been no basic diligence. Gillespie claims that the intensity of vaccine batches in Australia has varied wildly, yet the authorities did nothing.

“The TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration) has tested batches in this country and the variants have been 81.3 per cent down to 55.7 per cent. A recipient of an mRNA above 72 per cent is essentially getting a toxic dose … we have never seen such instability in drugs,” he said.   

Most insidious of all is the way that politicians and bureaucrats have exploited Australia’s federalist structure to ensure that their brutal attack on the citizens and doctors remains unaccountable. Australians once thought of themselves as mostly decent people with practical common sense. The last two years have shown that those who govern us are anything but.  

Gillespie is bringing an action in the Federal court alleging that revelations of fraud in the vaccine trials by the whistle blower Brooke Jackson, which were published in the British Medical Journal, should have been addressed “under the pharmaco-vigilance duties of the TGA.”  

He says that, as a matter of Australian law, if fraud is suspected to have touched a decision, then it must be suspended immediately and investigated. We wish him well. But is Australia even a country of laws anymore? Or is it a country of evil bureaucrats aided and abetted by dishonest politicians?     

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Featured Image

Monica Smit has been on the front line of Australia’s fight for freedom since August 2020. Most recently she is internationally recognized as Australia’s first political prisoner. She spent 22 days in solitary confinement for refusing to sign draconian bail conditions. The conditions were appealed and revoked. She is now free to continue her work.  
Monica founded an organization called ‘Reignite Democracy Australia’, which now offers a business directory, a social media platform, and 100 community groups around the country, and keeps Australians informed every day with current news and resources.  
She’s also working closely with political parties who respect human rights in the upcoming federal election. 


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.