MELBOURNE, Australia (LifeSiteNews) — A letter to Australia’s health regulators and politicians from the Covidmedicalnetwork.com extensively details their massive failure to assess properly the effects of the vaccines that are being brutally forced on Australians.
The list of shortcomings revealed is too long to detail here, but it ranges from the investigations being too limited in scope, a refusal to consider reliable research showing the jabs are not safe, the already high rate of injuries and death, the failure to consider treatments from repurposed drugs, a complete ignoring of the now established superiority of natural immunity and, perhaps worst of all, the possible indications that the mRNA inoculations change a person’s DNA, something the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) specifically declared cannot happen.
If anybody is surprised at the gravity of the accusations being made, they shouldn’t be. It was impossible to do adequate safety checks in only a few months. Before the COVID panic it was a given in biomedicine that it takes six to eight years to make judgements about the medium-term effects of drugs. So when Australia’s health bureaucrats and politicians declared that the “vaccines” were safe they were engaging in deliberate deception. They could not possibly have known that and their deceit is now clear.
The Covidmedicalnetwork.com is bravely trying to get Australian medical authorities to finally do their jobs properly. They are unlikely to get far. People who deceive rarely respond well when exposed. It is human nature, when caught out, to obfuscate, so it is no surprise that the documents are heavily redacted. This in itself arouses suspicion. If the assessment processes were sound, why is information being hidden? And what gives public servants the right to conceal information from the public?
Much of what is in the letter will be familiar to those who have taken the time to track the evidence emerging around the world of the dangers of the jabs. I urge people to read it, depressing though it is. It also raises another question. Can debate over science and public policy in this country ever recover? Or are we destined to see more and more of our basic rights eroded? Will the mantra ‘we are following the science’ come to mean: ‘shut up and obey, or else’?
The cynical use of alleged science was especially egregious with the Victorian premier Daniel Andrews, one of Australia’s more tyrannical state leaders, passing a law giving him the right to unilaterally declare a state of emergency whenever he wants and to re-imprison the citizens with lockdowns.
On the rare occasions when alternative scientific claims were mentioned in his heavily managed press conferences, Andrews would respond: “You have your scientists, I have mine.” As far as he was concerned it was just an exercise of power. That is why he bragged, when he was partially removing restrictions (but only for the jabbed), that for the unvaccinated he was replacing “lockdowns with lockouts.”
Such aggression against Australian citizens by politicians – the Western Australian premier Mark McGowan has just established a ‘COVID detection force’ to randomly test people – is unprecedented in this country. It is hard to escape the conclusion that we are entering a dark new era in which the state will use whatever it claims is the science to destroy our democratic rights.
The letter, which came after a Freedom of Information request, estimates that somewhere between 2,275 and 6,501 Australians probably died as a consequence of receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, which “likely means that more have died from COVID-19 vaccines than from COVID-19 illness.” That is an understatement. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) 2,639 people have had COVID listed on their death certificates, but only 220 had onlyCOVID listed. Even on the lowest estimates, vaccine deaths are already higher than COVID deaths.
The ABS also showed that COVID deaths were heavily skewed to the elderly; the average age is almost identical to the average mortality in the country. Yet there are now saturation advertisements on Australia television urging parents to jab 5-11 year olds, who are at zero risk from the disease. That is child homicide.
The letter points to growing evidence that vaccines kill. The most reliable measure is all cause mortality, and there are disturbing trends in Australia, as there are around the world: “In contrast to 2020, and commensurate with the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines in Australia, we are confronted with a seriously concerning set of data. During the period 1 January through end of November 2021, Australian health authorities and politicians promoting COVID-19 vaccines need to explain the following: there were 6,949 deaths (5.4%) more than the 2015-19 average, and there were 6,264 deaths (4.8%) more than in 2020.”
The authors describe the situation as an “abominable state of affairs, bereft of any notion of the Hippocratic Oath or the upholding of the Precautionary Principle.” Australians are, they claim “in an environment now driven by public health institutions and their officers, extolling politicised and compromised information, at the expense of truth, any respect for informed consent, let alone respecting the once sacred and honoured and inviolable doctor-patient relationship.”
That, unfortunately, is where Australia has gone. Recovering our democracy after such abuse of mock science will be a long and difficult road.
LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.