Blogs
Featured Image
The Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa, OntarioSpiroview Inc./Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) – Canadian commentary on the United States is almost always an exercise in insufferable back-patting, and nowhere is that more true than when columnists opine on the differences between our top courts.

In America, Canadian pundits note smugly, the Supreme Court is partisan and political, unlike in Canada, where we are so well-governed that we don’t even know who our justices are. The latest example of this cringe is from the National Observer which published a column with this pretentious headline: “You probably don’t know who’s on our Supreme Court. Let’s keep it that way.”

The Observer, of course, pinpointed the overturn of Roe v. Wade as a particularly egregious example of the court’s partisanship (Roe v. Wade itself and the subsequent decision to uphold it, of course, were not political). The columnist in question then managed to make a string of mistakes, including repeating the popular falsehood that justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch had promised not to overturn Roe (they simply affirmed it as a longstanding precedent, which it was and is no longer.) Canada’s court, on the other hand, is a model of stability because Canadians don’t seem to care about it much.

But the only reason that Canadian liberals are so pleased by this state of affairs is because Canada’s Supreme Court is willing to throw out its own precedents in its relentless pursuit of maximal liberalism. It is Canada’s Supreme Court that consistently strikes blows against religious freedom; it is Canada’s Supreme Court that created the euthanasia regime now viewed the world over as a cautionary tale (“if we’re not careful, we’ll end up like Canada.”)

If, on the other hand, the Supreme Court ruled on religious liberty, or abortion, or assisted suicide in a way that liberals do not like, their tune would change immediately, and we would be treated to a string of columns howling about how Canada’s top court became Americanized.

— Article continues below Petition —
Free Enoch Burke, the teacher jailed after not using teen's "they" pronoun
  Show Petition Text
17725 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 20000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Irish teacher Enoch Burke has been arrested and jailed after refusing to use a transgender student's preferred pronoun, "they", in the classroom.

This insane step by Irish authorities must be called out for what it is: the unhinged intimidation of an educator by demented ideologues.

Please add your name to our urgent message to the High Court today.

SIGN: Enoch Burke must be freed immediately as an educator who upheld the truth

Burke was suspended by his school for refusing to use the transgender pronouns of a student, even confronting his principal about the irrationality of the situation, and defying a subsequent court injunction barring him from performing his teaching duties.

He is now in Mountjoy Prison, Dublin after being brought before a judge on 5 September who found Burke to be in contempt of the injunction by attending work after his suspension.

Burke, who told the High Court “I am here today because I would not call a boy a girl”, made clear that he would not abide by the injunction because it would violate his conscience as a Christian.

“Were I to obey the order of the board of management and the order of the court, I would have to accept that sticking by my belief in male and female is wrong,” he said. “It is not something I will do. It is in violation of my conscience."

“Were I to go into the school and bow to something I know to be manifestly wrong, it would be a shame and a disgrace on my part,” he added.

This defiant attitude has now prompted Burke's arrest and imprisonment in an Orwellian debacle that should send warning signals to the watching world.

Mr. Justice Burke ordered Burke be "committed to Mountjoy Prison and remain therein until he purges his contempt or until further order of this court.”

Defending himself, Burke replied: “I cannot purge my contempt by holding my Christian beliefs in contempt."

Burke hugged his father and brother before being taken away by Gardaí to Mountjoy Prison.

Please share this petition with as many people as possible - it's clear that leftists will not tolerate dissent on this absurd issue unless we all push back.

SIGN: Enoch Burke must be freed immediately as an educator who upheld the truth

Thank you.

MORE INFORMATION:

Irish teacher jailed after refusing to use transgender pronouns - LifeSiteNews

  Hide Petition Text

Progressives view their beliefs as normative, and if institutions support their agenda, then all is well. If, however, justices or politicians have the temerity to oppose them, then democracy is suddenly dying. Remember the hysteria about Stephen Harper, the social liberal with some fiscal smarts, and how he was going to destroy the country?

This is not even to mention the fact that Canada’s Supreme Court is politicized – but only one side is playing the game. Harper stacked Canadian courts with progressive justices who then overturned nearly the entirety of his legacy in around fifteen minutes and gave us a lethal suicide regime to boot (Trudeau passed the legislation; the justices who found a Charter right to suicide were Harper appointees). If a Conservative prime minister wanted to appoint a pro-life justice, we’d be told that real fascism had actually arrived.

You may remember that back when Justin Trudeau was in the process of getting rid of Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould for refusing to go along with his unethical behavior, someone – probably on Trudeau’s team – leaked to the press that Trudeau was disturbed by one of Wilson-Raybould’s Supreme Court nominee recommendations. Why? Because, as the CBC put it:

Wilson-Raybould’s pick puzzled Trudeau but he became disturbed after doing some research into [Glenn] Joyal’s views on the charter, the sources said. Joyal had criticized the judiciary for broadly interpreting charter rights and expanding them to apply to things not explicitly mentioned in the charter or, in his view, intended by provincial premiers when they agreed to enshrine a charter in the Constitution.

The Supreme Court’s liberal interpretation has led to things like legalization of same-sex marriage, the right of women to choose to have an abortion and the legalization of medical assistance in dying, among other things – developments Trudeau has celebrated.

So, Trudeau and the Liberals ensure that only liberal justices who support their agenda get put on the Supreme Court – no pro-lifers allowed! And conveniently for them, the last Conservative prime minister also put liberals on the court. And that is what leftist pundits mean when they say that Canada’s top court isn’t partisan – that there is not a single judge who disagrees with their beliefs.

Featured Image

Jonathon Van Maren is a public speaker, writer, and pro-life activist. His commentary has been translated into more than eight languages and published widely online as well as print newspapers such as the Jewish Independent, the National Post, the Hamilton Spectator and others. He has received an award for combating anti-Semitism in print from the Jewish organization B’nai Brith. His commentary has been featured on CTV Primetime, Global News, EWTN, and the CBC as well as dozens of radio stations and news outlets in Canada and the United States.

He speaks on a wide variety of cultural topics across North America at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions. Some of these topics include abortion, pornography, the Sexual Revolution, and euthanasia. Jonathon holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in history from Simon Fraser University, and is the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.

Jonathon’s first book, The Culture War, was released in 2016.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

5 Comments

    Loading...