Blogs
Featured Image
Ellen Page in 2019Rich Polk / Getty Images for IMDb

(LifeSiteNews) – In the wake of a series of severe setbacks in Europe and laws banning gender mutilation surgeries and puberty blockers in the U.S., the transgender movement is doubling down and pushing to reconsolidate their control over the narrative. That narrative – that the surgeries and “treatments” increasingly condemned as causing irreversible damage by medical experts from London to Oslo – has been under fire from unexpected sources, with even the New York Times publishing a few cautious columns covering the long-term negative effects of puberty blockers (such as osteoporosis).  

In the face of a mounting body of increasingly unignorable evidence, the transgender movement is once again calling on Big Tech to censor anyone who disagrees – and they’re using celebrities to do it. This particular call for censorship comes in an open letter released by GLAAD on June 27, 2023, and addressed to Mark Zuckerberg of Meta Platforms, Neal Mohan of YouTube, Shou Zi Chew of TikTok, and Linda Yaccarino and Elon Musk of Twitter. Two-hundred fifty celebrities signed it, including Alyssa Milano, “Elliot” (Ellen) Page, Laverne Cox, Billy Eichner, Billy Porter, Gabrielle Union-Wade, Demi Lovato, Hailey Baldwin Bieber, and Jamie Lee Curtis. 

Most of those names are no surprise – Page identifies as transgender, Lovato has identified with various letters in the alphabet acronym, Porter is a longtime LGBT activist, and Union-Wade and Curtis have children who identify as transgender. Hailey Baldwin Bieber, however, is a new name, and many of those who believed that she and her pop star husband were some sort of Christian are being introduced to where the real loyalties of celebrities lie. The open letter notes that 

As celebrities, influencers, and prominent public figures with significant followings on social media, we the undersigned are calling on Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and Twitter to fulfill the promises you’ve made to transgender, nonbinary, gender non-conforming and all LGBTQ users in your terms of service. There has been a massive systemic failure to prohibit hate, harassment, and malicious anti-LGBTQ disinformation on your platforms and it must be addressed.

The letter asserts that allowing “hate” on social media has resulted in “an outsized role in the sharp increase in real-world anti-transgender targeting and violence” and that “this is particularly the case when it comes to the online extremists leading proactive coordinated campaigns of hate and lies about gender affirming healthcare for trans youth. Despite the fact that every leading medical and psychological association affirms the safety and necessity of gender affirming healthcare for trans people, including youth, inflammatory disinformation falsely asserting that this healthcare is dangerous is allowed to fester on your platforms because it drives clicks and profit.”

Conservatives saw Big Tech’s COVID protocols as a cautionary tale; transgender activists saw them as a trial run.

Here the letter is referring to commentators such as Matt Walsh and Christopher Rufo, who have used social media to expose the transgender industry to great effect. The letter is incredibly disingenuous – as I noted, the U.K.’s National Health Service as well as prestigious medical institutions across Europe are not only abandoning the so-called “gender affirming model,” but openly condemning it – the NHS even condemns “social” transitioning, never mind sex changes. This letter is a lie designed to get ideological opponents kicked out of the digital public square, with celebrities leveraging their influencer status and follower counts to assert that a failure to do so will result in dead transgender people – a derivative of their classic argument that failure to make so-called sex changes and cross-sex hormones available will cause suicides. 

The celebrities then “call for you to meet with community leaders and creators to hear about these real world harms that result from anti-trans content on your platforms — and to create and share plans for how you will address” the banning of content on the “treatments” in question—and here, they specifically call for a new system of censorship to be implemented. Tellingly, they note: “Specific mitigations on such disinformation must be developed (for instance akin to election and COVID-19 mitigations and rules).” This underscores how correct many were to be concerned about Big Tech’s across-the-board suppression of any alternative COVID narratives – because once the digital public square was run by the state and the state was run by progressives, dissent – and in many cases, truth-telling – would become impossible. Conservatives saw Big Tech’s COVID protocols as a cautionary tale; transgender activists saw them as a trial run. Now they’re calling for the real thing.  

The celebrities also specifically call out YouTube for allowing conservative commentators to expose the transgender industry: 

Anti-transgender hate speech, including targeted misgendering, deadnaming, and hate-driven tropes. For example, Media Matters, GLAAD and others have identified multiple YouTube videos — which have accumulated millions of views — that bully, harass, and misgender trans people. In each video, prominent anti-trans pundits use YouTube to demean, target, and misgender young people, their parents, and public figures20 in videos saturated with blatant anti-trans rhetoric. These videos remain active despite these violations having been reported by Media Matters, GLAAD, and other organizations to YouTube.

Translation: We’ve warned you about this before. You didn’t listen. We’re going to give you another chance. The irony of this letter is that it is itself spreading dangerous “disinformation” about unnecessary and irreversible medical procedures and drugs for gender-confused minors – but that is precisely the sort of objection they’d like to ban. Trans activists are angry because with Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter, they lost control of one of the top platforms – and now they are trying to reassert it. If the Big Tech companies heed them, we will see the digital public square transition even further.  

Featured Image

Jonathon’s writings have been translated into more than six languages and in addition to LifeSiteNews, has been published in the National Post, National Review, First Things, The Federalist, The American Conservative, The Stream, the Jewish Independent, the Hamilton Spectator, Reformed Perspective Magazine, and LifeNews, among others. He is a contributing editor to The European Conservative.

His insights have been featured on CTV, Global News, and the CBC, as well as over twenty radio stations. He regularly speaks on a variety of social issues at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions in Canada, the United States, and Europe.

He is the author of The Culture War, Seeing is Believing: Why Our Culture Must Face the Victims of Abortion, Patriots: The Untold Story of Ireland’s Pro-Life Movement, Prairie Lion: The Life and Times of Ted Byfield, and co-author of A Guide to Discussing Assisted Suicide with Blaise Alleyne.

Jonathon serves as the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.

8 Comments

    Loading...