Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news. Subscribe now.
January 21, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Does the Pfizer vaccine increase the risk of coronavirus infection and death from the COVID-19 disease it is supposed to be helping to avoid? A French retired orthopedic surgeon, Gérard Delépine, who together with his wife Nicole, a retired pediatric oncologist, has devoted a great deal of his time to the study of COVID statistics, believes the link is there.
At the present stage of his investigations, he argues that the recent evolution of the epidemic in the countries that presently have highest vaccination rate “gives reason for concern.”
Delépine presented his study in an opinion piece published last Saturday by FranceSoir, the only French daily that is routinely covering dissident information about the pandemic narrative. All numbers quoted were sourced to the World Health Organization’s official data.
The world champion, vaccine-wise, is Israel, which negotiated a priority contract with Pfizer at the beginning of January when stocks started to run low — with a 40 percent hike in prices, according to Delépine. Israel is followed on this list by the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, the U.K. and the U.S. To date, Israel has ascribed 4,080 deaths to COVID-19 for a total of 565,629 “cases” since the first positive tests on March 12.
Vaccinations in Israel started on December 19. Less than one month later, by January 14, over 20 percent of the total population (2 million of a total of about 9 million) have already received at least one jab of the mRNA vaccine. The vaccine contains messenger RNA that will prompt the receiver’s own cells to fabricate the SARS-Cov-2 spike protein (its outer shell), thus eliciting an immunological response.
The technology has never been used before on a large scale on human beings. Testing procedures were accelerated and some of the usual assessments were even scrapped in a “time race” against COVID-19, while at the same time many governments thwarted or banned effective cures for the disease, such as hydroxychloroquine, Azithromycin, and Zinc, or Ivermectin, and refrained from recommending D3 vitamin supplementation to boost the general public’s immunity.
Back to Israel and its uber-efficient vaccination campaign: started to rise steadily at a high rate as of December 20, from 1,886 cases on December 21 to 8,094 on January 10, observed Gérard Delépine: a 400 percent increase precisely at a time when ever fewer Israelis should have contracted the virus as the inoculation rate rose, and the waiting period for the vaccine to become effective.
Daily death rates also rose quickly, from 18 deaths on December 20 to a high of 67 on January 12. Israel is still in lockdown, the third since last March.
A similar trend can be observed in the U.K., where the vaccination campaign kicked off as early as December 4, also with the Pfizer/BioNTech jab. Daily , or cases, as they say, jumped from 14,898 at the start of the campaign to 68,053 on January 8; they are now decreasing.
Of course, case rates are directly related to the number of tests and do not necessarily concern people who are actually ill with COVID-19. But the number of deaths attributed to COVID also rose spectacularly, from 414 on December 4 to 1,564 on January 14 – this is 27 percent higher than the peak 1,224 deaths observed last April. Here also, caution is recommended: A recent article in the London Telegraph showed that the excess mortality in this COVID wave is not very high compared to the spring pandemic.
But there is still a rise. At the same time in France, where the same caveats can be made, the vaccination campaign kicked off so slowly that it is jokingly said that it’s the only country where the minister of health knows the first name of all those who received the jab. But contrary to the U.K., new infections remained low and then rose since January 8, and appear to be descending again, while COVID deaths remained more or less stable on a weekly average basis since the beginning of December.
The death rate per million is also much lower than in countries where the vaccination rate is much higher.
**Photo credit: Shutterstock.com
Mainstream media sources are promoting offensive suggestions by some doctors that people who refuse a vaccine for COVID-19 should be "punished" by the government and by business - effectively coercing them into taking the vaccine.
- One group of doctors writing in 'USA Today' suggested that the government impose special taxes (i.e., fines) on people who refuse the vaccination and that business simply refuse to serve them. [see story below]
- Another doctor writing in an online publication called 'The Conversation' shamelessly suggested that people who refuse a vaccine should be given a psychoactive drug to induce compliance. [see story below]
But, these suggestions are plain political posturing, and have nothing to do with science or with the recent trends of the disease.
And, in case they haven't noticed, we live in a democracy not a medical dictatorship!
Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks policy-makers and business people, at all levels, to pledge to respect the rights of those who, in good conscience, decide not to vaccinate themselves or their children.
People should not have to live in fear of governmental or corporate retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
It would be intolerable and immoral for the government or business to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will to avoid a fine, or just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping.
Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.
So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished for refusing a vaccine.
Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.
Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.
We can no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question, especially now that, statistically speaking, the initial brunt of the COVID crisis has passed.
Neither can we accept the dictates of doctors who seem detached from reality and from science, and who only seem to be attached to the idea of promoting ideas which contribute to the agrandizement of power and control of political interests, and wealth of those who stand to make a lot of money from the sale of a COVID vaccine.
Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks government and business leaders to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and not seek to punish them for doing so.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
'Doctors lay out plan to ‘punish’ people who refuse coronavirus vaccine: ‘There is no alternative’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctors-lay-out-plan-to-punish-people-who-refuse-coronavirus-vaccine-there-is-no-alternative
'US professor: ‘Psychoactive pill’ should be covertly administered to ensure lockdown compliance' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-professor-ensure-lockdown-compliance-by-drugging-dissenters-with-psychoactive-pill
Delépine makes clear in his op-ed that he is not a systematic anti-vaxxer. He quoted illnesses that are transmitted through lack of access to potable water and sewage treatment for which vaccinations are useless in developed countries, such as polio, typhoid fever and cholera, and others for which vaccines have proved to have been insufficiently tested such as the dengue vaccine that caused “hundreds of deaths in the Philippines” and the Gardasil anti-HPV vaccine “that paradoxically increases the risk of cervical cancer.”
He added, “There is no individual benefit to be expected from COVID vaccination for those under 65 years of age, since the disease is milder than influenza in this population, which means this population can expect nothing from COVID vaccines other than complications. And the societal argument, ‘we take the vaccine to protect others,’ is also irrelevant, since there is little evidence that the vaccine is capable of preventing or slowing viral transmission.”
As to fragile populations who are more at risk of developing a severe form of COVID, for whom the vaccine would theoretically be useful, Delépine underscored that the risks associated to the jab itself were “not correctly assessed, in so far as the evaluations refused to include this high-risk population.”
“The precautionary principle therefore justifies not routinely vaccinating them until sufficient transparent data are available affirming efficacy and absence of toxicity in real populations,” he wrote, concluding that those French people taking the Pfizer shot have in reality accepted to be the “guinea pigs” of the phase 3 tests that were omitted in the name of speed.
