An article in today’s reports that nearly half of the GP’s in the Netherlands have felt pressured by relatives to lethally inject a patient while 20% are willing to euthanize a person who is simply “Tired of Living.”

The article states that according to a survey of 800 family doctors in the Netherlands that was done for the television programme EénVandaag:

  – 20% are willing to help a patient who is “tired of life.”
  – One third of doctors have refused to carry out a euthanasia request over the past five years.
  – almost 75% said they were unwilling to carry out euthanasia on someone who is worried about unbearable suffering in the future.
  – Just under 70% of the doctors polled said they had actually carried out euthanasia on a patient over the past five years.
  – Around half of the GPs questioned said they had felt pressured by patients or their relatives to die by euthanasia.

It is important to note that the Dutch claim to have a strict euthanasia law, but the facts show otherwise.

In the Netherlands, euthanasia deaths increased by 13% in 2009; the most recent study shows that every year there are about 550 deaths without explicit request or consent and nearly 20% of all euthanasia deaths are not reported.

Another recent article explained how the euthanasia of people with dementia has now become accepted in the Netherlands

Now this poll has found that almost half of the Dutch GP’s feel pressured from relatives to euthanize patients.

The concepts of safeguards, choice and autonomy are only really only the slogans that the euthanasia lobby use.

In reality safeguards are simply barriers to be overcome, choice is only for the few and when did autonomy have anything to do with the decision by a doctor to lethally inject their patient?


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.