Blogs
Featured Image
 shutterstock.com

January 22, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – “Out of sight, out of mind.” This simple saying accounts for much in the battle over the unborn. As long as people can make themselves not think about the tiny baby human they do not see, they can pretend as if he or she doesn’t really exist – or as if the child is “something” vague, indefinite, blobbish, not-yet-human. This explains, to a large extent, the opposition to laws that require an ultrasound image for women considering abortion. The proponents of abortion do not want them to see.

In one of his most profound works, The Mystery of Being, the twentieth-century philosopher Gabriel Marcel (1889–1973) draws the reader’s attention to “the mysterious character that attaches to the presence near one of a sleeping person, especially of a sleeping child.” He goes on to say:

From the point of view of physical activity, or at least in so far as the notion of physical activity is defined in relation to the possible grasping of things, the sleeping child is completely unprotected and appears to be utterly in our power; from that point of view, it is permissible for us to do what we like with the child.

But from the point of view of mystery, we might say that it is just because this being is completely unprotected, that it is utterly at our mercy, that it is also invulnerable or sacred. And there can be no doubt at all that the strongest and most irrefutable mark of sheer barbarism that we could imagine would consist in the refusal to recognize this mysterious invulnerability.

David Hume (1711–1776), a skeptical agnostic whose philosophy is opposed in almost every respect to Marcel’s, nevertheless makes a similar point in A Treatise of Human Nature:

‘Tis an aggravation of murder, that it was committed upon persons asleep and in perfect security; as historians readily observe of any infant prince, who is captive in the hands of his enemies, that he is more worthy of compassion the less sensible he is of his miserable condition.

Indeed, this is – or should be – evident to all. Hume’s predecessor, John Locke (1632–1704), a founding father of modern liberalism who defends an almost absolute right over one’s own property and one’s own body, nevertheless stresses that parents have no power over the lives of their offspring, for whose well-being they are accountable (see Second Treatise on Civil Government).

Yet the gradual degeneration of thought that has resulted in the almost universal acceptance of abortion, in which a child asleep in the womb is brutally murdered, is at least in part Hume’s fault. Hume was the first modern thinker to say that causality is a fabrication of the mind, a mere custom of thinking. That is, we can never know for sure whether one thing (say, a flame at the stovetop) is responsible for another (heating up the pot of water); it’s all a matter of the way we look at things. We can’t even know if a thing that appears to be the same – a dog or cat, for instance – remains the same as itself over the passage of time; it might be different every day, as when the ancient philosopher Heraclitus said that the sun was new each day, extinguished at night and newly born at dawn.

Whether they realize it or not, many people today have adopted Hume’s skepticism in the matter of abortion, although they would reject it in almost every other case of practical life. Just as we know that a man of 80 is essentially the same human being he was when eight years old, in spite of the changes that have taken place over the course of 72 years – a fact we acknowledge by calling him by the same name the whole time – so too, we know that an embryo or fetus = an unborn child or baby = a human being with a face, a heart, hands, and feet, already named or ready to be given a name. Embryo, unborn child, adolescent, youth, man, or woman are words that refer to different stages of the same developing reality; they refer to one thing, an enduring individual identity.

In spite of this common sense view, people talk and act as if a “fertilized egg” had nothing to do with a child or a human being, although it would be difficult to imagine a more obvious fact of nature. Seeing the unborn child through the ultrasonic window on the womb, seeing it as a little child resting peacefully in its mother’s bosom, is a way to bring home this fact, and turn it into conviction and care.

Featured Image

Peter Kwasniewski, Thomistic theologian, liturgical scholar, and choral composer, is a graduate of Thomas Aquinas College in California (B.A. Liberal Arts) and The Catholic University of America in Washington, DC (M.A. and Ph.D. in Philosophy). He taught at the International Theological Institute in Austria and the Franciscan University of Steubenville’s Austria Program, then helped establish Wyoming Catholic College in 2006. There he taught theology, philosophy, music, and art history and directed the choirs until leaving in 2018 to devote himself full-time to writing and lecturing.

Today he contributes regularly to many websites and publications, including New Liturgical Movement, OnePeterFive, LifeSiteNews, Rorate Caeli, The Remnant, and Catholic Family News, and has published thirteen books, including four on traditional Catholicism: Resurgent in the Midst of Crisis (Angelico, 2014, also available in Czech, Polish, German, Portuguese, Spanish, and Belarusian), Noble Beauty, Transcendent Holiness (Angelico, 2017), Tradition and Sanity (Angelico, 2018), and Reclaiming Our Roman Catholic Birthright: The Genius and Timeliness of the Traditional Latin Mass (Angelico, 2020). His work has been translated into at least eighteen languages.

Kwasniewski is a scholar of The Aquinas Institute in Green Bay, which is publishing the Opera Omnia of the Angelic Doctor, a Fellow of the Albertus Magnus Center for Scholastic Studies, and a Senior Fellow of the St. Paul Center. He has published over a thousand articles on Thomistic thought, sacramental and liturgical theology, the history and aesthetics of music, and the social doctrine of the Church.

For news, information, article links, sacred music, and the home of Os Justi Press, visit his personal website, www.peterkwasniewski.com.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.