Blogs
Featured Image
MONACA, PA - NOVEMBER 02: Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden speaks at a campaign stop at Community College of Beaver County on November 02, 2020 in Monaca, Pennsylvania. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

November 2, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Once upon a time, in an America far, far away, Senator Joseph R. Biden was considered to be “unreliable” by abortion-rights groups. He was one of those reluctantly pro-choice Democrats, the sort of guy who voted the right way some of the time, but went squeamish when it came to issues like late-term abortion. He even voted to overrule President Bill Clinton’s veto of the partial-birth abortion ban in the 1990s, and stated that while he would not impose his “beliefs” about abortion on America, America had no right to garnish the wages of her citizens to fund feticide.

At least, that’s the version of Joe Biden that we were intended to see. A revealing essay in the National Catholic Register by Paul Kengor, professor of political science at Grove City College, Pennsylvania, describes a moment indicating that Joe Biden was always a radical on abortion.

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark LifeSiteNews.com to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

On June 29, 1992, at the Amtrak station in Wilmington, Delaware, a strange scene unfolded. On the platform, Senator Joe Biden of Delaware and Senator Warren Rudman of New Hampshire saw each other, broke out into smiles. Then, writes Kengor, they “dash into one another’s arms. They can’t stop hugging. They are jubilant, ecstatic—literally moved to tears.” The reason for their tears of happiness was the news that had just come from the Supreme Court: In a 5-4 decision, the Court had upheld the key holding in Roe v. Wade in their latest decision, Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Rudman described the scene in his 1996 memoir Combat: Twelve years in the U.S. Senate:

At first, I didn’t see Joe; then I spotted him waving at me from far down the platform. Joe had agonized over his vote for David, and I knew how thrilled he must be. We started running through the crowd toward each other, and when we met, we embraced, laughing and crying.

David, as Kengor noted, referred to David Souter, a Supreme Court justice put forward by George H.W. Bush. Souter had been the swing vote in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the decision that pro-life activists and political operators had worked towards for years. This was the case that was supposed to be the culmination of years of pro-life efforts and undo the abominable 1973 decision, which even scholars such as Ruth Bader Ginsberg admitted was simply bad law. The majority opinion, it turned out, was written by Souter, Anthony Kennedy (since replaced by Brett Kavanaugh) and Sandra Day O’Connor (replaced by Samuel Alito.) All three were appointed by pro-life Republican presidents.

— Article continues below Petition —
Vote FOR Life, Family, Faith and Freedom -- Election Day Open Letter
  Show Petition Text
6292 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Donald Trump/Joe Biden                                                                                                                                                      Photo Credit: White House/Flickr | mark reinstein/Shutterstock.com

Core conservative and Christian values are at stake in the upcoming election.

So, it's vital that we - and our family and friends - know which candidate will defend them.

Please SIGN this open letter which calls for the preservation of our core values of Life, Family, Faith and Freedom.

Then, please USE and SHARE our 2020 LifeSite Voter Guidehttps://www.lifesitenews.com/votelife

The following core conservative and Christian values will all be affected, one way or the other, by the outcome of the election:

  • The protection of human life from conception till natural death.
  • The protection of the natural family.
  • The protection of our right to freely and meaningfully practice our religion both inside and outside our houses of worship, without interference from the state.
  • And, the protection of our freedoms - especially, our freedom of speech, our freedom of assembly and licit medical freedom.

So, where do the candidates stand on Life, Family, Faith and Freedom?

_______________________

ON LIFE

President Trump has already proven himself to be pro-life. He reinstated the Mexico City Policy, prohibiting U.S. foreign aid from paying for and, or, promoting abortions. And, he has also pledged to sign a late-term abortion ban and veto any pro-abortion legislation.

Former Vice President Biden supports tax-payer funded abortion (i.e., getting rid of the Hyde Amendment), and has been endorsed by Planned Parenthood and NARAL.

ON FAMILY

President Trump’s tax cuts have helped 82% of middle-class American families, which saved an average of $1,260 on their taxes according to Breitbart News.

On the contrary, if former Vice President Joe Biden implements the "Green New Deal," thousands of energy sector jobs will be eliminated. What’s more, Biden plans on raising taxes by more than three trillion dollars – a move which could severely hurt the average American family.

Additionally, President Trump backs school choice for all American families, which will allow parents to choose the school that best meets the needs of their children.

However, former Vice President Biden supports policies that are not in favor school choice. His policies would hurt families by keeping parents from choosing a school that would help their children and provide them with the best opportunities.

Finally, President Trump's administration has co-sponsored the Geneva Consensus Declaration, which reaffirms that “the family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State", and which seeks to achieve the "strengthening of family as the foundational unit of society."

While, earlier this year, former Vice President Biden revealed his “LGBTQ+ and equality” plan, which he will use to “protect,” “enforce,” and “advance” the homosexual agenda and homosexual “rights."

ON FAITH

President Trump’s second-term agenda includes the promise to "defend the freedoms of religious believers and organizations."

Former Vice President Biden stands against conscience rights - vowing to sue the Little Sisters of the Poor to force them to pay for abortion and contraceptives. And, Biden also stands against religious freedom, as he and the Democrats support mandating that pro-life Christian business-owners, like cake bakers, violate their religious beliefs.

ON FREEDOM

If re-elected, President Trump has promised to minimize lockdowns and mask mandates.

If elected, former Vice President Biden has promised to enact a nationwide mask mandate, and allow more lockdowns.

________________________

Now that you know where the candidates stand, please consider voting to preserve Life, the Family, our Faith, and our Freedoms!

And, please SIGN this open letter, USE the LifeSite Voter Guide, and SHARE the LifeSite Voter Guide. Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

LifeSite's 2020 Voter Guide - https://www.lifesitenews.com/votelife

  Hide Petition Text

It was this news that had Joe Biden and Warren Rudman sobbing with happiness. As Kengor put it:

Biden wept tears of joy in the arms of Rudman, shouting triumphantly of Souter: “You were right about him! You were right!”

Rudman was indeed right. He had pushed Souter’s nomination by Republican President George H.W. Bush. He ensured liberal colleagues that Souter was okay. Rudman, a pro-choice Republican, had been Souter’s boss at the New Hampshire Office of the Attorney General…Rudman was confident that Souter would not vote against Roe. After all, averred Rudman, Souter was “a compassionate human being.”

But Rudman’s allies on the Democrat side weren’t so sure. And Rudman had to walk a fine line, since his pro-life president purportedly wanted a pro-life justice. So Rudman quietly sought to assuage liberal Democrats like Biden and Ted Kennedy. He urged the two pro-choice Catholic senators to trust him. And no single member of the Senate Judiciary Committee was as important as Joe Biden, who chaired the committee. He ensured that Souter sailed through. Souter cruised out of Biden’s committee, a 14-3 vote, and was then confirmed by the full Senate in a landslide, 90-9 (with a “Yes” vote from Biden) — very much unlike Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas, two pro-life nominees. The trust between Biden and Rudman was critical, since Souter’s position on abortion had to be dealt with stealthily. In fact, it was handled so delicately that the nominee’s true thinking was apparently unknown even to the White House.

Biden’s gamble had paid off, and Republican appointees to the Supreme Court ensured that Roe v. Wade would live to kill another day. Additionally, Rudman, a liberal Republican, was certain that the pro-life movement had been defeated. “The combined efforts of the Reagan and Bush administrations and the religious right to overthrow Roe had been defeated, probably for good,” he wrote. That fact filled Biden and Rudman with euphoria. As other commuters stared at the two men, they continued to carry on like happy kids: “[W]e just kept laughing and yelling and hugging each other because, sometimes, there are happy endings.”

“Happy endings.” That’s how Rudman referred to a decision that has now taken up to 65 million innocent lives. Rudman himself died in 2012, and his friend Joe Biden, who shared his euphoria and tears of joy over the Supreme Court’s decision to preserve America’s abortion regime, is now attempting to become president of the United States one last time. Biden is doing so as the most pro-abortion presidential candidate in American history, something that has surprised those who believe Biden is a moderate. But perhaps his show of moderation was always a sham. The real Joe Biden revealed who he was on an Amtrak platform in 1992, hugging his friend and laughing wildly at the news that the abortion industry had been saved.

Joe Biden weeping for joy that Roe v. Wade was saved did not reveal who he was: He revealed who he is.

Jonathon’s new podcast, The Van Maren Show, is dedicated to telling the stories of the pro-life and pro-family movement. In his latest episode, he interviews Mark Crutcher to discuss the state of the pro-life movement, what pro-lifers need to be focusing on, and what the 2020 US election means for those throughout the world opposed to abortion. In 1999, Crutcher's group exposed the illegal sale of baby body parts by Planned Parenthood and other abortion facilities. They also exposed the abuse and assault that occurs at abortion clinics as well as the industry's cover-up of statutory rape.

You can subscribe here and listen to the episode below: 

Featured Image

Jonathon Van Maren is a public speaker, writer, and pro-life activist. His commentary has been translated into more than eight languages and published widely online as well as print newspapers such as the Jewish Independent, the National Post, the Hamilton Spectator and others. He has received an award for combating anti-Semitism in print from the Jewish organization B’nai Brith. His commentary has been featured on CTV Primetime, Global News, EWTN, and the CBC as well as dozens of radio stations and news outlets in Canada and the United States.

He speaks on a wide variety of cultural topics across North America at universities, high schools, churches, and other functions. Some of these topics include abortion, pornography, the Sexual Revolution, and euthanasia. Jonathon holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in history from Simon Fraser University, and is the communications director for the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform.

Jonathon’s first book, The Culture War, was released in 2016.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.