(LifeSiteNews) — The truth has come out: From the outset, activist jurors in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial were bound and determined to advance a leftist political agenda rather than justice for the precious children that Clancy strangled to death.
Other than a lone juror who has been crucified by his fellow jurors and doxxed by corporate media, Clancy’s liberal, female-dominated jury ignored their civic duty to render a verdict based on the facts of the case and instead decided they would imitate activist judges, using their platform to advance their own perverse feminist cause.
The cadre of social justice jurors accused the holdout of ignoring the judge’s instructions while all along it was they who had ignored the law.
During a weekend CBS Morning show, juror Paula Devlin spilled the beans: “We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it better for other women in the future.”
During her next media tour stop, juror Paula Devlin says the mostly female jury knew the Lindsay Clancy trial could create change to “make it better for other women.”
“We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it… pic.twitter.com/4aBlCDzeUx
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) September 13, 2026
Many expressed horror at her admission.
“A mistrial was ironically the right call, but not because of the holdout,” Joseph Younis, MD, explained on X. “It’s clear that there was significant activist-confounded groupthink involved, seen clearly from this statement.”
“Her goal in this case was to ‘make it better for other women,’” online commentator Jason Howerton said. “It was never justice for these 3 beautiful children.”
“This isn’t doing your civic duty. It’s usurping your civic duty to advance a political cause,” IT Guy explained.
“And they had the gall to complain about the loan juror who wouldn’t compromise himself for their political cause,” he added.
“We’re witnessing the rise of the Social Justice Jurors and it’s terrifying,” LA GOP district chairman Lisa Cusack declared.
“She’s admitting that she came into this trial with an agenda, which is far worse than anything the holdout may have done,” X user Fusilli Spock noted.
The damage the 11 have inflicted on our court system may be incalculable.
“Lord, have mercy, these women jurors instrumentalized law to make social policy,” Rod Dreher lamented. “They are tearing down confidence in the justice system.”
“The point of a Jury finding isn’t to make a social statement or make a social change but to determine whether the facts support a particular verdict in a case,” AG Hamilton said. “It’s very concerning that some of these jurors apparently viewed their job as something else.”
“Their minds are completely fried by social media and Netflix,” Jack Posobiec suggested. “They can’t handle a jury trial let alone weighing evidence. It’s all about Marxist division and gender warfare for them.”
“Our justice system depends on citizens setting shared identities aside and applying the law impartially,” Heritage Foundation Kevin Roberts stressed. “That becomes increasingly difficult when Americans are taught that equal justice under law is less important than this month’s intersectionality rankings.”
“This was not just jury nullification, it was juror insurrection!” attorney Federalist Society member Mark Pulliam remarked.
On January 24, 2023, 32-year-old Lindsay Clancy, a former labor and delivery nurse, sent her husband Patrick to pick up takeout food and go to the pharmacy. While he was out of the house, she proceeded to strangle 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan with rubber exercise bands. She then slashed her own wrists and neck and threw herself out of a second-story window. The two older children were declared dead that day. Callan died in the hospital three days later.
