(LifeSiteNews) — Outgoing Scottish National Party leader Nicola Sturgeon has put forward an initiative that will enable women in Scotland who have suffered a miscarriage prior to 24 weeks gestation to apply for a “commemorative certificate,” creating a formal record of their child’s existence.
The new initiative, which will begin this summer, will be free of charge, and those who choose to participate will be able to record the loss of their child in a Memorial Book produced by the Scottish government and National Records of Scotland, which is responsible for recording births and deaths.
Parents who wish to record their children’s deaths – and implicitly, their existence – can do so as long as they live in Scotland, and will not be required to submit any medical evidence. If parents have suffered multiple miscarriages, they can apply individually for each child, and parents can also submit applications for children they lost prior to the start of the initiative. The program is intended to “give recognition and comfort” to those who have lost children – all participation is voluntary.
Sturgeon stated that her own deeply felt grief over a miscarriage she suffered in 2011 at the age of forty was the motivation to create the initiative. “The loss of a pregnancy or baby is always painful,” she said. “I have spoken in the past about my personal experience of miscarriage, and I know the sense of grief will stay with me and my husband forever. I also know that we would have drawn comfort at the time if there had been a way for us to mark the loss and formally recognise the child we were grieving.”
UPDATE (03/07/23): Walgreens won't dispense abortion pills in 20 states
The pressure is paying off. Walgreens' plan to dispense abortion pills nationwide is now in tatters, with the pharmaceutical giant announcing that it won't mail the pills to, or sell them within, 20 states.
The news comes after 20 Republican attorneys general warned CVS and Walgreens that doing so would be in violation of federal law and that they were opening themselves to penalties.
But we can't rest on our laurels with this boycott: Walgreens and CVS will only listen to us when their profits are threatened — we need a HUGE boycott so that blood money they get from selling abortion pills is dwarfed by the profits they lose when pro-life America shops elsewhere.
Even Politico admitted in its reporting that "pressure" from pro-life voters like you helped change Walgreens' plans, so now we're asking you to take the next step: simply share this petition with your friends and ask them to join the boycott.
Walgreens and CVS will begin selling mifepristone — a powerful chemical that kills unborn children in the womb — if pro-life America does not ACT NOW.
Pro-life Americans MUST STOP the widespread sale and distribution of mifepristone by sending a message that only big-box stores will understand: A NATIONAL BOYCOTT OF WALGREENS AND CVS.
Walgreens and CVS are the newest back-door channels for the pro-abortion movement, now that the Supreme Court has overturned Roe v. Wade.
Will you act now to STOP abortion drugs from reaching your pharmacy?
Our work in the pro-life movement is FAR from over, especially now that Walgreens and CVS have chosen to push deadly drugs in their stores and in our communities!
SIGN and SEND a message to Walgreens and CVS! This is completely unacceptable!
We must stop abortion from reaching our pharmacies and stop the abortion industry from poisoning our communities — before it’s too late.
These big-box stores respond only to profit. The pro-life movement must enact a national boycott if the abortion industry dares flood our neighborhoods!
SIGN and SEND a strong message to Walgreens and CVS: unless they immediately reverse course, the entire pro-life movement will BOYCOTT their stores!
SIGN NOW and send a clear message!
CVS & Walgreens announce plans to dispense abortion pills after Biden FDA loosens restrictions
The Memorial Book, Sturgeon said, would give parents the opportunity to “commemorate their loss with a physical record, and to have their child recognised” and that she hoped it would “bring comfort to those experiencing the pain of baby loss” as well as “break the silence and stigma around the loss of a pregnancy or a baby that sadly still exists in our society.”
This is a wonderful policy that will likely have precisely the impact Sturgeon is hoping for. Social recognition of children lost through miscarriage is a public validation of that child’s existence as well as his or her value. I hope other countries consider similar policies.
But it is also strangely schizophrenic.
This new initiative allows parents to record the loss of children up to 24 weeks. That happens to be precisely how long abortion is legal in Scotland. Those children, too, constitute “baby loss.” Yet, they are not only unrecognized, but the right to kill them is formally enshrined in law.
Indeed, Sturgeon has publicly endorsed the right to kill children in the womb. The day Roe v. Wade was overturned in the United States, she tweeted:
One of the darkest days for women’s rights in my lifetime. Obviously the immediate consequences will be suffered by women in the U.S. – but this will embolden anti-abortion & anti-women forces in other countries too. Solidarity doesn’t feel enough right now – but it is necessary.
She also advocated for buffer zones around abortion clinics and considered offering women from Northern Ireland free abortions.
Why bring this up? Because this schizophrenia is a lethal one. If Nicola Sturgeon believes what she has so movingly said – that “baby loss” is profoundly painful for parents, and that social recognition of these children is important, then there are obvious, inescapable conclusions that must be pointed out.
Are the unwanted babies violently killed by abortion somehow less human than the wanted babies who die naturally of miscarriage? Is the value of a child’s life dictated by how much the parents value him or her?
Children who die in miscarriage are precious and should be recognized as such. Children killed by abortion are precious and should be recognized as such. You can reject both of these views, but you cannot choose only one.