Featured Image

July 26, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In explaining Pope Francis’ decision to restrict the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass, Fr. Thomas Reese SJ — the former editor-in-chief of the Jesuit America magazine — claimed that some people who attend it are objectional. For example:

These ideologues argue that the new Mass is an abomination, that ecumenism is a betrayal of tradition and interreligious dialogue is satanic. They believe that only they are the true church and everyone else is in error.

Supposing that such individuals are frequenting the liturgy and receiving the sacraments, this seems a win for the Church, but Fr. Reese apparently does not see the Church as a field hospital for sinners, but as a conventical of the perfect.

However, the supposition that the idea that interreligious dialogue is in itself satanic is held by a significant number of 1962 Mass-goers is extremely fanciful. What Reese is doing is to conflate syncretism, which has been repeatedly condemned by the Church and is also condemned by Traditional Catholics, with dialogue, which is something quite different. There is indeed something deeply disturbing about incorporating Hindu ceremonies into the Mass, for example, but this syncretistic project has got nothing to do with respectful discussions with Hindus. On the contrary, it has seriously annoyed Hindus as well as upset faithful Catholics: hardly a good way to go about interreligious dialogue.

If Reese is concerned about ecumenism and interreligious dialogue, then he is faced with a different kind of problem. Traditionis Custodes has set the Church’s relations with other religions back fifty years, and it is difficult to see how they will recover.

On interreligious dialogue, defined as discussions aimed at greater mutual understanding between the Church and non-Christian religions, the Apostolic Letter and the polemic being produced by Fr. Reese and others in its support is saying that a genuine engagement of the religious instinct is impossible through worship in a sacred language, using chant, complex ceremonies, elaborate vestments, and so on. That, as they say, is a point of view. But it is a point of view incompatible with taking seriously the search for God represented by Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, the Jain religion, Shamanic religions, and indeed practically any non-Christian religion you could mention. Sacred languages are found in all the major non-Christian religions — Hebrew, Sanskrit, and Classical Arabic most obviously — and sacred music, ritual, and clothing, in practically all of them.

How are Catholic interreligious dialoguers going to face their non-Christian friends the next time they meet? “It okay”, they might say. “It is only our own traditions which we fear and loath: We think yours are wonderful!” How credible is this going to be?

As I have argued at greater length before, a dialogue with Islam seeking mutual understanding, and equally the proclamation of the Gospel to Muslims (something the Church is committed to by Vatican II — remember: “the mission to proclaim and to spread among all peoples the Kingdom of Christ and of God,” Lumen Gentium 5), is easiest if we have some common ground with them. One area of common ground, which has a practical value in opposing the anti-family policies of some groups in the United Nations, is a respect for life and for the family. Another is the penitential tradition. One aspect of Islamic spirituality which finds an echo in Catholicism is the use of chant; another is the expression of the transcendence of God through ritual. All of these are given a greater emphasis in the Traditional Catholic context. Much the same can be said in relation to other non-Christian religions.

In relation to the Orthodox — a dialogue with Christians who do not accept the authority of the Pope, with the hope that reunion under the Pope might one day be possible — the same problem exists as just outlined, to an even more acute degree: The Pope apparently dislikes the liturgical practices which characterize Orthodoxy. As I have argued at greater length here, how can you reject celebration ad orientem, chant, the use of sacred languages, mystery and ritual, in the West, and then turn to our Eastern “separated brethren” and tell them how much you respect and admire them in the East?

— Article continues below Petition —
SIGN: Show Pope Francis the Latin Mass will survive any suppression
  Show Petition Text
36557 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 40000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

LifeSiteNews will hand-deliver this petition to the Holy See, recording the moment traditional Catholics from around the world stood up for the Traditional Latin Mass.

Pope Francis has issued a new decree, "Traditiones Custodes," severely restricting the celebration of the Traditional Latin Mass (TLM).

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition with other Catholics, and ask the Pope to reconsider this new and divisive Motu Proprio.

Pope Francis' decree clamps down hard on the TLM. In it, he effectively does away with Pope Benedict's protection of it, handing bishops in every diocese the right to suppress it, while demanding new priests get permission from their bishop and the Vatican to offer the Mass of the Ages. 

As Catholics who value Tradition and know the place of the Magisterium in safeguarding the Deposit of Faith, it is time to speak up and have our voices heard

Francis has decried rigidity and intolerance for years, but now is showing intolerance and rigidity himself by forcing his very narrow understanding of liturgy on one of the true sources of good fruit in the Latin Rite of the Catholic Church.

Our Lord said that "a bad tree cannot bear good fruit", and yet we see more and more souls drawn to Christ through the TLM, with marriages dedicated to God and open to many children, and vocations also abounding in traditional seminaries, orders and priestly societies.

Indeed, the Traditional Latin Mass has been a source of unity for the Catholic Church for more than 1500 years, producing great saints, repentant sinners, and souls won for Christ across the world. *Read below how Benedict XVI decried attacks against the TLM and its adherents.

To attempt to restrict the Traditional Latin Mass, as a new generation are rediscovering the treasures of God's Church, will inevitably cause further division and hurt among the faithful, risking the loss of some souls who will regretfully turn away

Souls are now at stake with this Motu Proprio, as some will drift away from the Deposit of Faith in disillusionment, while others that are far from God will never be touched by the profound beauty and reverence found in the Traditional Latin Mass. 

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to Pope Francis, urging him to reconsider his decision, not least for the good of souls and the glory of God, and making sure as many cardinals support the TLM as possible. 

Click "Show Petition Text" on the right to read the letter to Pope Francis.

Finally, please pray, fast and do penance for the salvation of souls, including that of our shepherds, during this turbulent time in Church history.


'BREAKING: Pope Francis abrogates Pope Benedict’s universal permission for Old Mass' -

'ANALYSIS: Pope restricts ‘divisive’ Traditional Latin Mass, says 52-yr-old Novus Ordo is ‘unique expression’ of Church’s liturgy' -

* Pope Benedict XVI (Spirit of the Liturgy, 2000):

"For fostering a true consciousness in liturgical matters, it is also important that the proscription against the form of liturgy in valid use up to 1970 [the older Latin Mass] should be lifted. Anyone who nowadays advocates the continuing existence of this liturgy or takes part in it is treated like a leper; all tolerance ends here. There has never been anything like this in history; in doing this we are despising and proscribing the Church’s whole past. How can one trust her at present if things are that way?"

**Photo Credit:

  Hide Petition Text

There is another problem, too, which applies also to the dialogue with Protestants. Catholic theologians engaging with Protestants and the Orthodox since Vatican II have, understandably, been soft-pedaling the monarchical conception of Papal power associated with Popes like St. Pius X. Without getting into the details, there is obviously something wrong with the idea of the Pope as an arbitrary dictator, and Protestant and Orthodox criticisms of the Church often focus on this idea. Well, are they right to be suspicious that Papal power can be used arbitrarily? To insist on uniformity for its own sake? To make sudden U-turns of policy, upending years and decades of patient work by bishops and priests, who had been following the previous papal policy? What conception of Papal power is at work in the Catholic Church in 2021?

The Apostolic Letter Traditionis Custodes is not the answer to this question they had been hoping for.

Featured Image

Dr Joseph Shaw has a Doctorate in Philosophy from Oxford University, where he also gained a first degree in Politics and Philosophy and a graduate Diploma in Theology. He has published on Ethics and Philosophy of Religion and is the editor of The Case for Liturgical Restoration: Una Voce Position Papers on the Extraordinary Form (Angelico Press). He is the Chairman of the Latin Mass Society of England and Wales and Secretary of Una Voce International. He teaches Philosophy in Oxford University and lives nearby with his wife and nine children.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.