Featured Image
Kamala Harris on the phone during her campaign for presidentJustin Sullivan / Getty Images

Big Tech is censoring us. Subscribe to our email list and bookmark to continue getting our news.  Subscribe now.

February 17, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — That didn’t take long. Not four weeks into the Biden administration, and Kamala is already stepping in to perform one of the key functions of the president: dealing with foreign leaders.

Yesterday the White House published something it called a “Readout of Vice President Kamala Harris [sic] Call with President Emmanuel Macron of France.” The “readout” states:

Vice President Kamala Harris spoke today with President Emmanuel Macron of France, and expressed her commitment to strengthening bilateral ties between the United States and France and to revitalizing the transatlantic alliance. Vice President Harris and President Macron agreed on the need for close bilateral and multilateral cooperation to address COVID-19, climate change, and support democracy at home and around the world. They also discussed numerous regional challenges, including those in the Middle East and Africa, and the need to confront them together. The Vice President thanked President Macron for his leadership on the issue of gender equality and for France’s contribution to NASA’s Mars 2020 Perseverance rover.

Harris also recently spoke with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on COVID, climate change, and diversity. (So far, however, neither has called the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, our best ally in the Middle East.)

It is bizarre for a vice president to be making head of state calls to key U.S. allies and others just weeks into a new administration. Can you imagine Dick Cheney making such calls in the early weeks of the George Bush administration, or Joe Biden himself making POTUS counterpart calls for Barack Obama in early 2009?

Had this happened, the media would have quickly begun asking whether the president in question was up to the job.

In the case of Joe Biden, however, his abilities — such that they are — are not really in question. It’s been clear since the beginning of his campaign for president that he was in cognitive decline, and that, if elected, he would need a de facto “prime minister” to help carry out the day-to-day duties of the office.

The only question was: With the president’s role reduced to something along the lines of a figurehead, who was going to serve in this capacity.

Biden himself seemed to have acknowledged his limitations in 2020 when he called himself a “transition candidate,” a remark that seemed to suggest that he himself knows that he is not up to the job — at least for very long.

To my mind the two leading candidates for “prime minister” — Or should we say “acting president”? — are First Lady Jill Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

There is a precedent for a First Lady stepping in to run the show if the president is incapacitated. Woodrow Wilson's wife, Edith Wilson, ran the country for over a year after a stroke left him paralyzed on his left side. She decided who was allowed to see him and what documents he was shown. It is not for nothing that some have described her as “the first female President of the United States.”

“Dr. Jill,” as she styles herself, was often seen during the campaign serving as Joe’s minder, stepping in to guide him when he is confused or distracted. Now that he is in the Oval Office, she may also be quietly taking on some of his other duties.

Some have suggested that, based on handwriting analysis, Dr. Jill has been signing executive orders for her husband. If this is indeed happening, it would create a serious legal problem. If the president’s own signature is not on those EOs, they would be invalid.

One of the reasons that First Lady Edith Wilson was able to serve as “acting president” was that Wilson’s inner circle concealed the seriousness of his stroke. None of them were willing to certify, as the Constitution requires, his “inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office.” This included Wilson’s Vice President Thomas Marshall, who never attempted to replace Wilson.

Should Joe Biden have a similar sudden health crisis, however, I do not think that Kamala will hesitate to invoke the 25th Amendment and seek to have Biden removed from office. She’s too ambitious, and — moreover — has the backing of former President Barack Obama.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Oppose taxpayer-funded abortion #SaveHyde
  Show Petition Text
43752 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 45000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The Hyde Amendment prohibits the use of most federal funds for abortions, except in some limited circumstances.

But, with the Democrats in charge of the Congress and the presidency, the Hyde Amendment is now under severe attack.

That's why 200 Republican Congressmen vowed in a letter addressed to U.S. House and Senate leadership their "unified opposition to Congressional Democrats’ efforts to repeal the Hyde Amendment and other current-law, pro-life appropriations provisions."

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition to signal your support of the effort to keep the Hyde Amendment firmly in place, and prevent our federal tax dollars from funding abortion.

After signing the petition, please take a few minutes to quickly and easily contact your congressmen to politely voice your opposition to the repeal of the Hyde Amendment. Simply click on the link in the 'For More Information' section below, and follow the directions.

No-one should be forced to pay for any abortion, ever, against their will. Forcing taxpayers to pay for abortion would be a gross violation of freedom of conscience, and should be vigorously resisted.

Although President Joe Biden was originally in favor of the Hyde Amendment, even as recently as 2019, he has dramatically altered his position to align with the Democratic Party platform, which has promised to repeal the amendment throughout the 2020 presidential campaign and, indeed, since taking the presidency.

The Democrats officially support unlimited abortion on demand, funded by taxpayers. Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris marked the anniversary of Roe v. Wade by pledging to make abortion available to "everyone."

But, Americans overwhelmingly disagree with this proposed policy change. A 2019 Politico/Morning Consult poll found that 49% of Americans agree with the Hyde Amendment, while only 33% oppose it.

Regardless of polls, though, abortion is always and everywhere wrong.

Abortion is not necessary medical treatment, it is the deliberate destruction of unborn human life at its most vulnerable stage. Forcing taxpayers to pay for abortion would be unconscionable.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition, telling Congressmen of both political parties, to supports efforts to keep the Hyde Amendment in all federal budgets.

Thank you!


Please CLICK HERE to CONTACT your congressmen. It only takes a couple of minutes and the platform is very user-friendly. Thank you!

'200 GOP congressmen slam Democrats, say they’ll never vote for tax-funded abortions' -

2019 Poll on the Hyde Amendment -

**Photo Credit: Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

For the moment the role that Kamala Harris plays in the administration is solely defined by the president. The Constitution is completely silent on the duties of the vice president. This is why Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s vice president, John Nance Garner, reportedly told Lyndon Johnson that “the Vice Presidency is not worth a pitcher of warm spit.” He had clashed with Roosevelt during his second term and was pushed aside.

I do not think that will be Kamala’s fate. One already sees signs — the phone calls, for example — of how eager she is to assume the duties of the president. There are also reports that she hopes to lead the U.S. delegation to the G7 summit in Cornwall, England, this June.

As Slow Joe slows down even further, Dr. Jill will probably quietly take over more of his Oval Office duties, while Kamala gradually becomes the public face of the administration, taking upon herself the onerous foreign trips, such as the upcoming trip to the U.K.

I have never thought that Joe would serve out his full first term, let alone a second. Now, after watching his performance over the past few weeks, I’m thinking he won’t even make it to the midterms.

America will then, in Kamala Harris, have a president so radical that she will make Barack Obama look like a moderate.

Featured Image

Steven Mosher is an internationally recognised authority on China and population issues as well as an acclaimed author and speaker and founder and head of the Population Research Institute. He was the first American social scientist to visit mainland China in 1979 where he witnessed women being forced to have abortion under the new “one-child-policy” which he then exposed to the world. Mr. Mosher was a pro-choice atheist at the time, but witnessing these traumatic abortions led him to reconsider his convictions and to eventually become a practicing, pro-life Roman Catholic.

Mosher has appeared numerous times before the US Congress as an expert in world population, China and human Rights abuses. He has also made TV appearances on Good Morning America, 60 Minutes, The Today Show, 20/20, FOX and CNN news, as well as being a regular guest on talk radio shows across the nation.

He is the author of the best-selling A Mother’s Ordeal: One woman’s Fight Against China’s One-Child-Policy. His latest book is Bully of Asia, exposing the threat of China to the entire world at this time.

Articles by Steve have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Reader’s Digest, The New Republic, The Washington Post, National Review, Reason, The Asian Wall Street Journal, Freedom Review, Linacre Quarterly, Catholic World Report, Human Life Review, First Things, and numerous other publications.

Steven Mosher lives in Virginia with his wife, Vera, and their nine children.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.