Blogs
Featured Image
Prince Harry speaks at the United Nations General Assembly on Nelson Mandela International Day at U.N. headquarters on July 18, 2022 in New York City.David Dee Delgado/Getty Images

Help CCBR expose the truth about abortion: LifeFunder

(LifeSiteNews) – The disgraced member of the Royal Family, Prince Harry, gave a speech to the United Nations in New York on Monday to commemorate the “Mandela Day.”

In true leftist form he rambled on about all the politically correct and politically opportunistic talking points. Democracy, climate change, injustice of all kinds, and “vulnerable” people who have been failed by their systems were discussed.

The person and legacy of Nelson Mandela was discussed, but only to buttress Harry’s talking points. Apparently, Harry looked to “Mandela’s writings for insight” before writing the speech, but curiously he did not relay what those writings actually said.

In addition, the audience was told to “heed the advice Mandela once gave his son, to never give up the battle even in the darkest hour.” And what, pray tell, is the “battle” and “darkest hour” now facing mankind according to the prince?

Well, of course, it is access to abortion and climate change.

— Article continues below Petition —
DEFEND Mothers and Babies Against Powerful CEOs Paying Female Employees to Abort!
  Show Petition Text
5472 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 6000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

30+ powerful big-box, Big Tech, and mainstream media companies are targeting their young female employees by offering abortion travel “benefits” to new mothers — to kill their children for the sake of corporate profit and productivity! 

THIS PRO-DEATH CORPORATE CULTURE WILL DESTROY LIVES AND VILLIFY BIG FAMILIES AND PRO-LIFE VALUES IF WE DON’T ACT NOW!  

***WE CANNOT LOSE THE PRO-LIFE VICTORY AFTER ROE V. WADE TO ANTI-FAMILY COMPANIES! SEND A MESSAGE TO POWERFUL CEOs TODAY THAT YOU SUPPORT OUR CHILDREN’S RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!*** 

SIGN THE PETITION NOW TO WIN THE CORPORATE PRO-LIFE BATTLE! 

The pro-life movement has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to send a pro-family message to millions of citizens for generations to come — but we cannot LOSE OUT on this moment by caving to corporations and their cheap and disgusting “abortion” benefits! 

CONSUMERS MUST SEND A RESOUNDING MESSAGE TO ALL CORPORATE LEADERS THAT WE WILL NOT TOLERATE EMPLOYEE ABORTION PRESSURE! 

SIGN TODAY and demand the following company CEOs SUPPORT WOMEN AND CHILDREN NOW! 

***WE ARE DELIVERING THIS LETTER TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM!*** 

Jeff Bezos – Amazon 

 

Brian Moynihan – Bank of America 

 

Whitney Wolfe Herd – Bumble 

 

BuzzFeed – Jonah Peretti 

 

Cigna Health Insurance – David Cordani 

 

 

Citigroup – Jane Fraser 

 

CNN – Chris Licht 

 

Comcast – Brian Roberts 

 

Condé Nast – Roger Lynch 

 

CVS Health – Karen Lynch 

Dick’s Sporting Goods – Lauren Hobart 

 

Goldman Sachs – David Solomon 

 

Hewlett-Packard – Enrique Lores 

 

JPMorgan Chase – Jamie Dimon 

 

Kroger – Rodney McMullen 

 

New York Times – Meredith Kopit Levien 

 

Lyft – Logan Green 

 

MasterCard – Michael Miebach 

 

Meta/Facebook - Mark Zuckerberg 

 

Microsoft – Satya Nadella 

 

Paramount – Brian Robbins 

 

Patagonia – Jenna Johnson 

 

PayPal – Dan Schulman 

 

Procter & Gamble – Jon Moeller 

 

Salesforce – Marc Benioff 

 

Starbucks – Kevin Johnson 

 

Target – Brian Cornell 

 

Tesla, Inc. – Elon Musk 

 

Uber – Dara Khosrowshahi  

 

Vox Media – Jim Bankoff 

 

Disney – Bob Chapek 

 

Yelp – Jeremy Stoppelman 

 

Zillow – Rich Barton 

 

*** SIGN NOW AND MAKE YOUR PRO-LIFE AND PRO-FAMILY VOICE HEARD AT THE WORLD'S LARGEST CORPORATIONS! TELL THESE CEOs TO STOP SUPPORTING ABORTION TODAY! *** 

_____ 

Image Logos: Wikipedia 

  Hide Petition Text

Royal delusion

About halfway through the speech, Prince Harry revealed the real heart of his intentions and how he planned to use the legacy of Mandela to promote his agenda.

Within about 40 seconds he jumped from “a pandemic that continues to ravage” the world, to “climate change wreaking havoc on our planet,” and finally the “rolling back of constitutional rights” in the United States that constitutes “a global assault on democracy.”

We all know what he is referring to when he mentions a constitutional event in America: he is talking about the happy overturning of Roe v. Wade which ended the illusion that destroying unborn children was somehow a constitutional right.

As an aside, sometimes I wonder who taught these globalists – if anyone did teach them – basic reasoning skills.

I understand that Harry is not a Yankee, but might the Loyalist Royalist not understand that a constitutional decision is not a democratic one? Is he under the illusion that somehow abortion was a matter decided by popular democratic vote in America?

At any rate, Harry’s clarion call against the assault on “democracy” which resulted in the protection of unborn human beings, is consistent with the population control mindset of the Royal Family.

Royal abortion

This year was the commemoration of Queen Elizabeth II’ 70th year as Sovereign of the United Kingdom. I must admit, as a Canadian, I do hold a soft spot in my heart for the lady whose visage has adorned my money my whole life. However, it must also be admitted that Ol’ Betty might have been the most influential international leader in the post-WWII era that ushered in abortion-on-demand across the developed world.

In 1967, the Queen gave “royal assent” to the Abortion Act which okayed abortion in England up until 28 weeks gestation.

England has since killed upwards of 10 million unborn children.

It is striking to think that Elizabeth II would assent to such a thing, given the fact that Christian Evangelist Billy Graham had a close friendship with her, and it was said that she had a “traditional Christian faith.”

I don’t believe abortion legalization is a “traditional Christian” belief…

Royal population control

Now, I cannot pretend to know totality of Queen Elizabeth’s beliefs about life issues, however, her late husband was very clear about what he believed.

He was initiated into Freemasonry in 1952, honouring a promise made to the late King. It is said that he was not a dedicated mason as far as his participation was concerned, however, his worldview reflected what Freemasons have long believed.

Freemasonry offers a “naturalistic, universal religion” which is to say a world view that allows for a Divine Creator, but then sees the world through a more naturalist or materialist lens. This type of world view facilitates a type of natural pantheism where there is not a clear distinction between the value of a human person and the natural world.

In the 1960’s and 70’s Philip began show his Freemasonesque beliefs as he began to decry what he viewed as all sorts of environmental issues.

In 1972 he spoke of his concern that a “catastrophe” was on the horizon, citing “overpopulation, environmental pollution,” and more.

In 1988, Prince Philip seemed to take his pantheist leanings all the way, and joked (sort of) about reincarnating as a “deadly virus to contribute something to solving overpopulation.”

Generational curse  

Some things skip a generation in families, but Prince Philip’s royal assent to the Freemasonic-friendly world view of population control only intensified with his son and then grandsons.

His son Prince Charles – the Prince of Wales – has been adamant that “the traditional attitude to the sacred nature of life” is to blame for overpopulation, and unless widespread abortion and birth control are not accepted, then the “poor planet” will not be able to “sustain us all.”

Charles’ eldest son Prince William has expressed his population control views. Notably in 2017 and 2021 he essentially blamed Africans for having too many kids, opining that by doing so they endangered the wildlife of the continent.

Commentators found this ironic considering that William and his wife have three children, which is more than Charles had with Diana, William’s mother.

Prince Harry, however, is under no such illusion that having more than two children is acceptable. He worries deeply about “Mother Nature,” having suggested that the alleged pandemic was a response to treating her poorly.

In 2019 while speaking to primatologist Jane Goodall, Harry said he would never have more than two children. “Two, maximum” he said enthusiastically. He added that a species as “evolved as we are all supposed to be” should not be so irresponsible with procreation.

Perhaps someone could clarify a matter for me, as perhaps I am naïve, but I cannot see how it would ever be a sign of “evolution” if a species were to restrict procreation.

In fact, if we were to look around and see animals aborting their young or using contraceptives, we might think they had gone mad, but certainly not that they had “evolved.”

Whatever the case may be, it seems as if Prince Harry is proof that the British Royal Family has evolved from a Christian monarchical institution into a masonic inspired shill for population control and environmental alarmism.

Help CCBR expose the truth about abortion: LifeFunder
Featured Image

Kennedy Hall is an Ontario based journalist for LifeSiteNews. He is married with children and has a deep love for literature and political philosophy. He is the author of Terror of Demons: Reclaiming Traditional Catholic Masculinity, a non-fiction released by TAN books, and Lockdown with the Devil, a fiction released by Our Lady of Victory Press. He writes frequently for Crisis Magazine, Catholic Family News, and is on the editorial board at OnePeterFive.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

11 Comments

    Loading...