(LifeSiteNews) — Each year, my colleagues at the Canadian Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform speak to thousands of young people about abortion across Canada on campuses, at high schools, and on the streets. As I write this, dozens of young interns in both East and West are engaging the public.
Time and again, we find that young people are far more open to becoming pro-life than older people. Both internal polling as well as anecdotal experience indicates that the generations who grew up with “pro-choice” as their default setting are open to being presented with facts that prove they’ve been lied to.
A recent Ipsos poll by Global News published recently confirms the experience of many pro-life activists. According to the poll, 56% of Canadians support abortion access “whenever it’s wanted.” According to Sanyam Sethi, vice-president of public affairs, this is an increase since 2010. However, this does not hold for Canadians between the ages of 18 to 35, who “showed the least support in comparison with older generations,” which Sethi called “a very rare issue.” According to Ipsos:
Compared with the 63 per cent of Canadians 55 and over who believe people should be permitted to have an abortion whenever wanted, only 50 per cent of those 18 to 34 believe the same. A total of 15 per cent of respondents 18 to 34 also believe abortion shouldn’t be permitted unless the mother’s life is in danger. These findings aren’t only limited to Canada either, according to Sethi, who noted the trend is also upheld globally.
The other numbers presented by Ipsos are interesting but lack context. For example, Ipsos says that 61% of Canadians say that things should be left the way they are—but pro-lifers have found going door to door (and polling confirms this) that over 80% of Canadians have no idea what the status quo is. This is why the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada worked so hard to remove cross-Canada billboards which simply said “Canada has no abortion laws” — because the vast majority of Canadians don’t know that. Pollsters are polling people’s support on a status quo they are unaware of.
Ipsos found that in Atlantic Canada only 42% think abortion should be available on demand for any reason (as it is), with support rising to 63% in Alberta, 61% in BC, and 54% in Ontario (again, a majority of those polled would have been unaware that abortion is legal until birth.) Twenty-five percent told Ipsos they want the abortion debate reopened.
30+ powerful big-box, Big Tech, and mainstream media companies are targeting their young female employees by offering abortion travel “benefits” to new mothers — to kill their children for the sake of corporate profit and productivity!
THIS PRO-DEATH CORPORATE CULTURE WILL DESTROY LIVES AND VILLIFY BIG FAMILIES AND PRO-LIFE VALUES IF WE DON’T ACT NOW!
***WE CANNOT LOSE THE PRO-LIFE VICTORY AFTER ROE V. WADE TO ANTI-FAMILY COMPANIES! SEND A MESSAGE TO POWERFUL CEOs TODAY THAT YOU SUPPORT OUR CHILDREN’S RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS!***
SIGN THE PETITION NOW TO WIN THE CORPORATE PRO-LIFE BATTLE!
Starbucks said it would reimburse travel expenses for employees who need abortions and cannot get them within 100 miles of their homes. In a memo on Monday, the company said it wanted to ensure that its employees had “access to quality health care.” https://t.co/PI1Yg2xKTx
— The New York Times (@nytimes) May 16, 2022
Amazon says it will pay up to $4,000 in travel expenses annually for non-life threatening medical treatments including abortions, according to a message seen by Reuters. https://t.co/9M4Dtdzb4X
— NBC News (@NBCNews) May 3, 2022
The pro-life movement has a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to send a pro-family message to millions of citizens for generations to come — but we cannot LOSE OUT on this moment by caving to corporations and their cheap and disgusting “abortion” benefits!
CONSUMERS MUST SEND A RESOUNDING MESSAGE TO ALL CORPORATE LEADERS THAT WE WILL NOT TOLERATE EMPLOYEE ABORTION PRESSURE!
SIGN TODAY and demand the following company CEOs SUPPORT WOMEN AND CHILDREN NOW!
***WE ARE DELIVERING THIS LETTER TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THEM!***
Jeff Bezos – Amazon
Brian Moynihan – Bank of America
Whitney Wolfe Herd – Bumble
BuzzFeed – Jonah Peretti
Cigna Health Insurance – David Cordani
Citigroup – Jane Fraser
CNN – Chris Licht
Comcast – Brian Roberts
Condé Nast – Roger Lynch
CVS Health – Karen Lynch
Dick’s Sporting Goods – Lauren Hobart
Goldman Sachs – David Solomon
Hewlett-Packard – Enrique Lores
JPMorgan Chase – Jamie Dimon
Kroger – Rodney McMullen
New York Times – Meredith Kopit Levien
Lyft – Logan Green
MasterCard – Michael Miebach
Meta/Facebook - Mark Zuckerberg
Microsoft – Satya Nadella
Paramount – Brian Robbins
Patagonia – Jenna Johnson
PayPal – Dan Schulman
Procter & Gamble – Jon Moeller
Salesforce – Marc Benioff
Starbucks – Kevin Johnson
Target – Brian Cornell
Tesla, Inc. – Elon Musk
Uber – Dara Khosrowshahi
Vox Media – Jim Bankoff
Disney – Bob Chapek
Yelp – Jeremy Stoppelman
Zillow – Rich Barton
*** SIGN NOW AND MAKE YOUR PRO-LIFE AND PRO-FAMILY VOICE HEARD AT THE WORLD'S LARGEST CORPORATIONS! TELL THESE CEOs TO STOP SUPPORTING ABORTION TODAY! ***
_____
Image Logos: Wikipedia
Abortion polling in Canada is notoriously difficult to analyze because as with most data, the answers depend nearly entirely on the questions you ask. Polls conducted by the National Post on whether gender selection abortion should be legal, for example, revealed that 84% thought it should be banned—which is substantially higher than a quarter of Canadians.
Asking generic questions about abortion produces generic support in a country where ignorance is largely prevalent on what Canada’s regime is and does; asking specific questions on support for certain types of abortion and abortion at later stages consistently produces different answers. Polls are often conducted to shape public opinion rather than reveal it.
I’d like to make one final observation on abortion polling in Canada based on my experience doing activism and going door to door, especially in the Greater Toronto Area: most immigrant Canadians are instinctively if not intellectually anti-abortion, and very few of them recognize the terms “pro-life” or “pro-choice.”
Much of the polling I’ve seen over the past decade uses terminology and asks questions that frame a debate in very English terms, whereas we’ve canvassed neighborhoods were 90% of those we spoke to were at least mostly pro-life, but none of them had heard the terms before.
Once you explain what abortion actually is, most of them are horrified to discover what goes on in Canada. Those people — and there are millions of them — simply do not show up in the polling we are presented with from mainstream media. Many do not speak English.
Thus, the reality on the ground is far more complex than the Canadian media — or our politicians — would have us believe. The majority of Canadians are closer to a pro-lifer’s position than to Justin Trudeau’s extremism, although by no means are the majority of Canadians pro-life. There is much work to do — but there are also far more pro-lifers than you might imagine.