Blogs
Featured Image

(LifeSiteNews) — Today’s episode of The John-Henry Westen Show is a short but important discussion on Canada’s Emergencies Act and what Justin Trudeau’s invocation of it means.

LifeSite journalist Kennedy Hall was kind enough to join me to describe the Emergencies Act, what it is and what it isn’t, and how Trudeau’s invocation of it has created a political and legal mess for himself and the country.

Kennedy believes it’s helpful to first set out what the Emergencies Act is not, namely that it is not martial law.

“The Emergencies Act is not the same thing necessarily as martial law. Now, I’m not trying to say that it’s not bad, but I also just I don’t think it’s helpful if we’re not measured about what’s actually happening,” he said.

The act does not give the prime minister “special police powers” either, Kennedy added. Instead, it allows the prime minister to adopt certain powers for a very specific purpose, and he can only use those powers for that specific purpose. In this case, he’s seeking to take special action against the Freedom Convoy truckers in the supposed interest of “public welfare.”

But the fact remains that Trudeau’s invocation of the Emergencies Act is a shortsighted move made out of desperation. Kennedy points out how Parliament has a week to formally allow Trudeau to adopt the emergency powers and that they may be reluctant to do so.

Moreover, invoking the Emergencies Act to take action against the truckers appears legally questionable at best — and not even the Canadian mainstream media is on board with it!

“From a legal perspective, this is very dicey, is a bad idea. The Toronto Sun, the Ottawa Sun said the same thing, the National Post said the same thing. Even the CBC, the Communist … Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,” Kennedy said. “And the actual Senate is not majority Liberal at all. Most of them are independents, and the only political party that’s officially affiliated is the Conservative Party of Canada, who are vehemently against this.”

“And even if it does go through the Parliament and does go through the Senate in a timely manner, it is permissible and I think it actually is required if it’s desired to have an immediate constitutional challenge. And it has to go to the highest courts. We are in for a very legal mess and it is far from certain what’s going to happen,” he added.

The John-Henry Westen Show is available by video on the show’s YouTube channel and right here on my LifeSite blog.

It is also available in audio format on platforms such as SpotifySoundcloud, and Acast. We are awaiting approval for iTunes and Google Play as well. To subscribe to the audio version on various channels, visit the Acast webpage here.

You can send me feedback, or ideas for show topics by emailing [email protected].

Featured Image

John-Henry is the co-founder and editor-in-chief of LifeSiteNews.com. He and his wife Dianne and their eight children live in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario, Canada.

He has spoken at conferences and retreats, and appeared on radio and television throughout North America, Europe and Asia. John-Henry founded the Rome Life Forum an annual strategy meeting for pro-life leaders worldwide. He co-founded Voice of the Family and serves on the executive of the Canadian National March for Life Committee, and the annual National Pro-Life Youth Conference.

He is a consultant to Canada’s largest pro-life organization Campaign Life Coalition, and serves on the executive of the Ontario branch of the organization.  He has run three times for political office in the province of Ontario representing the Family Coalition Party.

John-Henry earned an MA from the University of Toronto in School and Child Clinical Psychology and an Honours BA from York University in Psychology.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

2 Comments

    Loading...