Blogs
Featured Image
President Donald Trump addresses a crowd during a campaign rally at Smith Reynolds Airport on September 8, 2020 in Winston Salem, North Carolina.Photo by Sean Rayford / Getty Images

(LifeSiteNews) – Though he still won’t come out and say it, Donald Trump is doing everything he can to hint that he intends to take another shot at the White House in 2024, most recently during a golf outing where he corrected a companion who called him the 45th president to add, “45th and 47th.” 

But should he? And if he does, should we be “very, very happy” about it?

To be sure, Trump did a lot of good things across a lot of issues during his four years, including in the areas of life, religious freedom, and gender sanity. He retains one of the most intensely loyal fan bases in politics. He called out media dishonesty like none of his predecessors. He seemed to have a special knack for driving the Left nuts. And there’s something undeniably tempting about the prospect of getting some well-deserved payback for Joe Biden’s 2020 lies and how much worse at the job he’s turned out to be.

But the temptation for revenge has a way of making us lose sight of other critical considerations, like how Trump would actually fare against the Democrat candidate, and what he would do with the opportunity if he won.

Note well that I didn’t say “against Biden—while the current incumbent’s abysmal performance gives Trump a goldmine of material to work with, the clear signs of cognitive decline that make Biden such a weak candidate also make it a very real possibility that Democrats will swap him out for someone younger, better spoken, and not saddled with Biden’s tremendous political and personal baggage.

What’s more, it’s not at all clear that Trump still has the mainstream appeal to win a national election. Even if vote fraud in 2020 really was large enough to flip an election that Trump rightfully won, the fact would still remain that public support for Trump over Biden was narrow enough for fraud to close the gap in the first place. After COVID, the post-election fight, and the January 6 fiasco, is it probable that the electorate is more inclined to support him at levels beyond stealing range? Some polls suggest not, though polls admittedly mean little either way more than two years ahead of an election.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: BOYCOTT IKEA for Discriminatory Policies Towards Unvaccinated Workers!
  Show Petition Text
36232 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 40000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

IKEA, the retail furniture giant, has announced that it will CUT sick pay for unvaccinated employees who are forced to quarantine after being exposed to Covid-19 in the United Kingdom!

That's right: In the ongoing global effort to discriminate against unvaccinated people, massive corporations like IKEA are taking things to the next level, and planning to deprive working people of the pay they're entitled to simply because of their vaccination status!

That's why we're asking you to SIGN and SHARE this petition calling on IKEA's executive leadership to discontinue any unfair policies that target unvaccinated workers and threaten them with reduced pay, or face a worldwide boycott of their stores and products.

This new policy will strip unvaccinated IKEA employees who have come in contact with someone who's tested positive for Covid-19 and, therefore, forced to isolate themselves, from well over half of their normal sick pay.

According to a report from Daily Mail, IKEA workers in the U.K. make, on average, between £404 and £452 per week. However, under the corporation's ridiculous new Covid policy, they can expect to make about £96.35 instead -- just because they've chosen against getting the vaccine.

To be clear: As the Omicron variant continues to rise, it's become more and more obvious that the Covid-19 vaccine is largely ineffective at preventing transmission and infection of the virus.

And it also goes without saying that everyone, everywhere should be able to opt against getting this experimental shot -- be it for medical, ethical, faith-based, or simply personal reasons -- without it affecting their ability to make a living and provide for their families.

But, as things currently stand, it would appear that IKEA executives disagree.

While the company has tried to sugar-coat the new policy to the best of their abilities, claiming that "this is an emotive topic and all circumstances will be considered on a case by case basis," the fact remains that any such policy seeks to penalize workers for being unvaccinated -- plain and simple.

And it's obvious where things are headed should this policy stay in place: Affected employees will inevitably opt against disclosing any known contact with a Covid-positive person in order to avoid unfairly losing their pay.

Regardless, this is unacceptable and IKEA must rethink things going forward.

So let's let them know where WE stand, and that, until they revoke this misguided, discriminatory pay policy, we will NOT continue to patronize their company or use their products any longer.

So please SIGN and SHARE this petition calling on IKEA's leadership to abandon this policy (and any future policies) that would, in any way, discriminate against employees in the U.K. for choosing against getting vaccinated for Covid-19.

It shouldn't be any multi-billion-dollar corporation's responsibility or prerogative to withhold pay from their workers just because they've chosen to retain the basic right to make important medical decisions for themselves without undue influence or coercion.

IKEA has let us know how they feel. Now it's time to share with them how we feel.

Thank you!


FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Retail giant Ikea will drastically cut sick pay of unvaccinated UK employees':
  https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/retail-giant-ikea-will-drastically-cut-sick-pay-of-unvaccinated-uk-employees/


**Photo Credit:  Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

Assuming Trump could and would win, we then have to consider, without rose-tinted glasses, what kind of president he would be in term two. Obviously we’d at the very least get an end to the myriad ways Biden is actively harming the country and an administration more sympathetic to us and our causes. But would we take steps toward actually healing America, or just slow the bleeding for another four years?

Trump’s aforementioned good deeds were many, but because they were mostly executive actions they were also the most transitory—as Trump had done to Barack Obama’s legacy, Biden immediately began dismantling Trump’s with the stroke of a pen.

On the deeper structural problems demanding presidential attention, the Trump years were far less impressive. He rubber-stamped most swamp budgets without a fight. He didn’t clean leftist saboteurs out of the Justice Department (which is a big part of why Planned Parenthood got away with fetal organ trafficking on his watch) or social-justice warriors out of the Pentagon. His selection process for judicial nominees was a disaster, leaving pro-lifers on pins and needles waiting to see what the Supreme Court will do about abortion. Almost nothing was done about vote fraud except for a failed commission that was doomed from the start thanks to bad appointments.

Is there any reason to believe that Trump has learned from any of these mistakes, that he’s gotten any better at determining whose advice to listen to and who to ignore? Just this past week he endorsed yet another establishment Republican over a more conservative candidate, this time in the GOP primary for Tennessee’s 5th district House seat, so it doesn’t exactly seem likely.

Perhaps most importantly of all, Trump is deeply compromised on what is arguably the most pressing issue of the moment, the COVID vaccine pressure campaign. While he wouldn’t mandate the shots like Biden is trying to do, the simple fact is that our current crisis wouldn’t be happening right now if the Trump administration hadn’t rushed them into existence in the first place (instead of prioritizing early treatment options while pursuing vaccine development under more traditional testing standards) and invoked the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act to give the drug companies sweeping immunity for potential side effects.

And because Operation Warp Speed is the only major aspect of Trump’s legacy that enjoys elite approval and won’t be dismantled by Democrats, he’s never going to let it go. Just ask yourself one simple question: if Trump showed no inclination or ability to reform federal agencies even when he didn’t have a glaring conflict of interest, what are the odds of him being the guy to clean up our corrupt federal health bureaucracy and get to the bottom of what the shots are really doing to people?

Right now, Donald Trump seems to think that his personality-driven fan base, combined with Biden buyers’ remorse, will make 2024 his for the taking. But the discontent over his as-yet-unrecognized mistakes is real, and it’s growing. Especially with a certain Florida governor delivering result after result on Trump’s issues plus establishing himself as a national leader for COVID freedom, the country deserves concrete answers from the 45th president on all of this before we even think about letting him try to become the 47th.

Featured Image

Calvin Freiburger is a Wisconsin-based conservative writer and 2011 graduate of Hillsdale College. His commentary and analysis have been featured on NewsReal Blog, Live Action, and various other conservative websites. Before joining LifeSiteNews, he spent two years in Washington, DC, working to build support for the Life at Conception Act with the National Pro-Life Alliance, then worked a year and a half as assistant editor of TheFederalistPapers.org. You can follow him on Twitter @CalFreiburger, and check out his personal website, ConservativeStandards.com.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

33 Comments

    Loading...