Featured Image

You’re invited! Join LifeSite in celebrating 25 years of pro-life and pro-family reporting at our anniversary Gala August 17th in Naples, Florida. Tickets and sponsorships can be purchased by clicking here. 

(LifeSiteNews) – In 1850, my namesake John Henry Cardinal Newman published the following, terrifying and striking words:

“The Catholic Church holds it better for the sun and moon to drop from heaven, for the earth to fail, and for all the many millions on it to die of starvation in extremest agony, as far as temporal affliction goes, than that one soul, I will not say, should be lost, but should commit one single venial sin, should tell one wilful untruth, or should steal one poor farthing without excuse.”

That published text was from a lecture on the topic of certain difficulties which Anglicans felt about becoming Catholics. He repeated this same text again in his famous biography in 1864.

So that’s three times he made this statement. Let’s make sure we understand what it means. The Catholic Church holds it better that all these terrible things would happen, rather than just one person committing one willful venial sin.

That’s how evil sin is – even just venial sin. And this text from Cardinal Newman is perhaps just a more vivid way of saying shorter phrases we all know: “The ends don’t justify the means,” or “We can’t do evil that good may come”.

I’m going to say some things today which are going to be very unpopular.

Here in Canada, we think of our leader as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. He is the leader of the government, a position which we influence by voting.

But in fact, the monarch is still Queen Elizabeth II, the Queen of the United Kingdom.

— Article continues below Petition —
Tell the Secretary of Defense: "Pride Month" is making our country weaker
  Show Petition Text
10084 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 12500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

At a time of global instability, nuclear tensions and war in Europe, the US Armed Forces have embarrassed themselves by taking a time-out to promote "Pride Month" among the watching world.

This wrongheaded preoccupation with the LGBT ideology across society is weakening our country in a number of ways, not least as it undermines the bedrock of society - the family.

It's time to tell the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, that we have had enough LGBT propaganda in the armed forces.

SIGN the petition - remind the Secretary of Defense that "Pride Month" only makes us weaker.

Marking the start of Gay Pride Month this week, the US Marines tweeted an image of a military helmet with 6 bullets in LGBT rainbow colors and the words "ready to serve" written on it.

Many responses highlighted the foolishness of an army, who wish to be feared, promoting such ideologies.

This comparison of recruitment videos from the Chinese, Russian and US armies shows how the LGBT ideology has infiltrated our country and taken military focus away from strength on the battlefield. 

How can the U.S. be respected as a super-power by our enemies if we continue to make our armed forces more effeminate, being prouder of the rainbow flag than the Stars and Stripes? 

The woke agenda of normalizing LGBT behaviors among children, adults and the armed forces is a war on reality, as more and more young people find themselves confused about their gender, their attractions, and even what the purpose of sex is. 

To understand how pervasive the LGBT ideology is, consider this: only 1.3% of those born before 1946 identified as LGBT in March 2021, compared to a whopping 15% of young people born between 1997-2002.

Mainstream media, educational institutions, politicians, and even some of the armed forces are conditioning the public to believe this is normal and healthy - it's not.

While all people must be respected, not all behaviors should be celebrated or condoned, lest society become decadent, degenerate and too selfish to make sacrifices.

SIGN the petition to remind the Secretary of Defense that he serves the Stars and Stripes, not the rainbow flag.

The need for virtue both in society and the armed forces is great, in order to strengthen this country's ability to choose what is good and defend it. 

In choosing to promote sexual behaviors and gender identities that are not based in nature, the armed forces have chosen vice instead of virtue.

Promoting the sexual revolution and other fashionable trends will have consequences, one of them being the decline of true and good men and women willing to stand by their families, their country and their flag during times of hardship.

Tell the Secretary of Defense that time-tested values matter, and the LGBT ideology should not be promoted.

Thank you for taking the time to sign our petition.


US military using diversity panels and all-gay helicopter crew - LifeSiteNews

Woke corporations push Pride, except in Middle East - LifeSiteNews

Biden adds "Intersex" to Pride Month proclamation - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: Travis Akers' Twitter photo of all-gay helicopter crew**

  Hide Petition Text

You might know – certainly our friends in England can’t miss it with all the Union Flags everywhere – that this weekend she is celebrating the Platinum Jubilee – 70 years – of her coronation.

There are a lot of celebrations going on. Queen Elizabeth is held up almost as a heroine, one of the few remaining world figures who will name Our Lord Jesus Christ.

Now, many think of the Queen as if she is a figurehead. And in a certain sense, she is: she does not directly (at least openly) engage in any decisions about the politics or life of our country, or any of the Commonwealth countries, or even in England and the UK. If she wields any influence, it’s all behind the scenes.

But actually there’s a lot more going on here. There’s some complex history and law which we won’t go into here, which make Canada’s situation a bit different to how it is in the U.K. – but there are definitely points of comparison.

The United Kingdom is not a republic like the United States. It’s a constitutional monarchy – and so are we in many senses. What this means is that the Crown has drawn back the exercise of its powers, and in practice allowed the machinery of government to function as if it were a democracy.

It’s something that looks and acts like a separation of powers, but in fact they’re all working in the name of the crown – in the name of Her Majesty the Queen. In theory, she could end this arrangement and start ruling like a proper monarch at any time.

But I’m telling you this to make clear that nothing is made law by the UK Houses of Parliament or by Boris Johnson’s government. These bodies hash out the bill, and then it is presented to her for Royal Assent, at which point it becomes law. In Canada, bills receive Royal Assent in the Queen’s name from other officials like the Governor General or his deputies.

By convention, the Queen never refuses royal assent. For the last several centuries this has been very rare across the remaining monarchies of the world. The reason is obvious: if this happened, the appearance and façade of a democracy would disappear, and an unelected, hereditary leader would be interfering in the decisions of an elected body.

I’m not saying that’s good or bad: it’s just what it is.

But let’s be clear about what that means. It means that when bills are presented to Queen Elizabeth, they do not become law until she gives them her assent. She has the power to prevent them becoming law, albeit with the massive constitutional crisis that that would cause. Realpolitik means that these laws will find some other, non-constitutional way in through a revolution.

She also has another power which she can exercise at any time. That is the power to abdicate.

If you’re starting to feel uncomfortable, it’s about to get worse.

In 1967, Queen Elizabeth II was presented with what became the Abortion Act. As the name suggests, this is the Act which made abortion legal in a wide set of situations up to 28 weeks gestation. As a result of this Act, England are set to have their 10-millionth abortion this year.

Ten million unborn babies murdered thanks to abortion – which only became legal because of the royal assent given to that Act in 1967. And there’s no sign of that stopping.

Would Roe v. Wade, in 1973, have been possible without Queen Elizabeth’s royal assent to the Abortion Act?

I want you to imagine, just for a moment, being Queen Elizabeth. Don’t think about the constitutional crisis, don’t think about the media or anything like that. It’s just you, your royal seal, and this law.

Could you give this law your assent?


Would it not be better to face the consequences of a constitutional crisis than give your free assent to such an abomination?

Or would it not be better to abdicate?

Let’s move on. What else happened in 1967?

Well, in 1967, Queen Elizabeth gave her royal assent to what became the Sexual Offences Act. This legalized homosexual activity.

In 2013, Queen Elizabeth consummated the work begun by this act by giving her royal assent to the bill which introduced homosexual “marriage” into law in England and Wales.

The combination of these laws with other provisions of law means that children are being taught about these things in schools, and small businesses like bed and breakfasts and bakers are being penalized for not being “equal” enough.

And again, this happened because of the royal assent given by Queen Elizabeth.

What else can we talk about? How about the royal assent to the 2008 law that allows scientists to make human/animal hybrids for stem cell research?

What about all the royal assent for all the different divorce laws over the last 70 years?  In 1969, the royal assent radically liberalized divorce in England and Wales, and further laws – all with royal assent – liberalized things further over the following decades.


Last of all let’s recall the last few years. England seems to have been one of the better places to be under the COVID madness, but nonetheless, the Queen gave royal assent to laws which allowed tyrannical government by ministers, along with everything we remember so well: allowing the government to lock everyone in their homes, restrict freedom of movement, close businesses, detain those suspected of COVID, close schools, and so on. All of this happened because the Queen gave Royal Assent. 

Do you think that Queen Elizabeth will refuse royal assent to a bill mandating vaccines for her subjects? Or a social credit system? Or a one-child policy?

Or anything?

Now, perhaps she thinks she has good reasons for this. Perhaps she thinks that it is better to retain her position and constitutional peace, because in that way she can work some greater good, or at least prevent further evils.

Let’s not kid ourselves with the idea that it could be better to assent so as to keep one’s position, so as to continue exercising a good influence. 10,000,000 dead babies is bad enough. How much is your good influence behind the scenes worth in the face of 10,000,000 dead babies, and counting?

And if the cost of maintaining some higher good is 10,000,000 dead babies, all these immoral laws and the toleration of absolute tyranny under COVID… what exactly is being conserved or preserved here?

I don’t say this in judgment: I don’t know the state of her soul, and I wish her good in this life and in the next. But we’re talking about the facts here.

Others might say that these laws would have gone through with or without her assent: that not only would she cause a crisis, but also she would be unable to stop them.

This is irrelevant. Let’s deal with what’s real, not with fictional or counter-factual scenarios. These terrible, immoral “laws” (because an unjust law is no law) were passed with her assent. She has chosen to cooperate with them. It’s nonsense to say she had no choice, even if the crushing pressures and reality of her situation are unknown to mere subjects.

We can have compassion on her state even whilst being real. To paraphrase St. Thomas More in the film A Man For All Seasons: “Your Majesty, it profits a man nothing to give his soul for the whole world… but for the Crown!”

And that’s what’s interesting here, even if we don’t know the state of her soul: not the legal consequences of her assent, but Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth herself; and what she has done to herself by all these compromises and assent given to evil through her reign.

So this jubilee weekend, if you’re benefitting from holidays, enjoy them. But be aware of what you’re celebrating, and more than anything – for we have a duty in piety to pray for our rulers – pray for the Queen.

The John-Henry Westen Show is available by video on the show’s YouTube channel and right here on my LifeSite blog.

You can send me feedback, or ideas for show topics by emailing [email protected].

Featured Image

John-Henry is the co-founder and editor-in-chief of He and his wife Dianne and their eight children live in the Ottawa Valley in Ontario, Canada.

He has spoken at conferences and retreats, and appeared on radio and television throughout North America, Europe and Asia. John-Henry founded the Rome Life Forum an annual strategy meeting for pro-life leaders worldwide. He co-founded Voice of the Family and serves on the executive of the Canadian National March for Life Committee, and the annual National Pro-Life Youth Conference.

He is a consultant to Canada’s largest pro-life organization Campaign Life Coalition, and serves on the executive of the Ontario branch of the organization.  He has run three times for political office in the province of Ontario representing the Family Coalition Party.

John-Henry earned an MA from the University of Toronto in School and Child Clinical Psychology and an Honours BA from York University in Psychology.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.