Blogs
Featured Image

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library. 

March 10, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — The Higher Committee of Human Fraternity, which includes Cardinal Miguel Ayuso Guixot and Monsignor Yoannis Lahzi Gaid, Pope Francis' personal secretary, launched its own Women’s Forum on Monday, March 8, when the world celebrated “International Women’s Day.”

Under the title “Hopes and Challenges in a Post-Covid Era,” the online forum focused on “gender equality” and the “exacerbated challenges” women are facing, according to the organizers, because of the pandemic. Several speakers spoke of a “pandemic in the pandemic.”

Most remarkable from a Catholic perspective – and surely this counts because the Higher Committee is grounded on the Abu Dhabi Document undersigned two years ago by Pope Francis and Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayyeb of the Sunni Al-Azhar University in Cairo – was the fact that several guest speakers have liberal and United Nations backgrounds.

Their participation points to further implementation and promotion of the original mindset of the UN, and particularly of UNESCO, whose first director, Julian Huxley, was a prominent supporter of eugenics. Over the years, the cultural organization of the United Nations has backed new pedagogies and blamed attachment to religions and upholding “tradition” for rivalry, wars and conflict among peoples. UNESCO has always preached that getting rid of religious pretense to the truth, “intolerance,” and acceptance of cultural stereotypes will open an era of peace and brotherhood.

This does not actually require doing away completely with the great historical religions such as Christianity or Islam. Instead, the program spelled out by the United Nations and other globalist groups and alliances calls for restructuring so that they accept peaceful coexistence with each other – and this means that no religion should claim to be the only true religion, to the detriment of the others, but that all should recognize other religions also offer a path to reach God.

Founded some years later than Catholicism, the Sunni Islam professed in Egypt has recently adopted this “aggiornamento” under president Al-Sissi and his pleas for adopting a non-violent interpretation of the Koran. Al-Azhar University has echoed his calls.

This ideological religious tolerance is present in the Abu Dhabi Document, which declared: “The pluralism and the diversity of religions, color, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings.” If the diversity of religions is willed by God, it means that He wills different forms of worship addressing themselves to different gods and suggests that, ultimately, all prayers to divinity are addressed to one and the same only God.

This mindset was clearly behind the Women’s Forum organized Monday by the Higher Committee of Human Fraternity, whose objective is to promote peace and tolerance among religions, particularly so-called “Abrahamic” religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam, with the papal benediction, so to speak.

One of the featured speakers was Irina Bokova, former director of UNESCO and now a full-fledged member of the Higher Committee of Human Fraternity. The Bulgarian-born Bokova is known for her links to communism in her native land. Her father was the director of a communist newspaper and she joined the Communist Youth. Her entry into politics took place when communism fell and she joined the Bulgarian Socialist Party, which was simply the communist party under a new name.

Former U.S. President Barack Obama supported Bokova's successful bid to head UNESCO, which she headed for eight years from 2009 to 2017. A number of former victims and political prisoners of the communist régime tried to block Bokova’s nomination, to no avail.

Another speaker at the virtual Women’s Forum was vice-president Epsy Campbell Barr of Costa Rica. She is a proponent of “gender equality,” and on June 5, 2020 called “Black Lives Matter” a “salvation motto,” calling on all to follow the young people who decided to “march and raise the banners of justice, equality and love.” Her idea for getting out of the COVID crisis was to “put money in women’s pockets” and to implement “universal health insurance.”

— Article continues below Petition —
U.S. Bishops: SHUT DOWN the Campaign for Human Development
  Show Petition Text
25756 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 30000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

For the last fifty years, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops has been taking up an annual collection to fund community organizing efforts across the country under the auspices of the Catholic Campaign for Human Development (CCHD).

And for almost as long, faithful Catholics have proved that much of these funds are going to organizations that promote abortion, contraception, homosexuality, and Marxist revolution.

Unfortunately, the CCHD has not improved and, to this day, continues to promote actions and ideas contrary to Catholic faith and morals.

That's why LifeSite and the Lepanto Institute have joined forces in this petition calling on U.S. bishops to permanently SHUT DOWN the Campaign for Human Development.

The response from the CCHD regarding reports that its grant money is going to agencies that attack Catholic moral and social teaching is nearly always the same: deny any wrongdoing and point to its thorough vetting process.

But, it’s vetting process is broken beyond repair!

Since 2013, an organization called the Workers’ Dignity Project (WDP) has been receiving large grants from the CCHD totaling a quarter of a million dollars. In 2017, WDP received $60,000 from the CCHD, and in 2019, it was $50,000.

If the CCHD’s vetting process actually worked, it wouldn’t have taken long for the CCHD to discover that WDP was a “community partner” of Planned Parenthood’s as far back as 2017, or that it sponsored an LGBT pride rally that same year.

In 2020, during the period of its most recent grant from the CCHD, WDP promoted and conducted a series of internet-based interviews promoting Planned Parenthood and abortion.

Please SIGN this petition, then WATCH the Lepanto Institute’s most recent investigation proving this by clicking on the link in the 'For More Information' section, below.

But it’s not just the vetting process that’s broken...the CCHD consistently ignores its own grant guidelines.

Just recently, the Lepanto Institute proved that three other organizations, receiving large grants from the CCHD, are in direct violation of the CCHD’s grant rules.

Receiving its first-ever grant of $45,000 from the CCHD in 2019, Stand Up Nashville is in direct violation of the CCHD requirement that the “organization, and its affiliates, partners and coalition members must not endorse or advocate policies and issues that are contrary to Catholic Social Teaching.”

Two member organizations of Stand Up Nashville have been promoting abortion and homosexuality as far back as 2015, and its executive director and many board members have actively done the same.

Another CCHD regulation specifically and expressly prohibits grantees from being members of coalitions which directly attack Catholic moral or social teachings.  The regulation says this:

“CCHD CANNOT FUND groups that knowingly participate in coalitions that have, as part of their organizational purpose or their coalition agenda or actions, anything that contradicts fundamental Catholic moral or social teaching” (emphasis original)

And yet, despite this, the CCHD is funding NOAH and MICAH, which are members of the pro-abortion Power Together Tennessee. The stated values and principles, which NOAH and MICAH would have known prior to joining, include this:

"We believe in reproductive freedom ... This means open access to safe, legal and affordable, abortion and birth control for all people ... we can only have reproductive justice when reproductive health care is accessible to all."

These are only the most recent examples of the CCHD’s fifty years of either gross incompetence or willful complicity in the funding of grave moral evils. Whichever the case, what’s clear is that this problem is not going to end as long as the CCHD continues to exist.

DID YOU KNOW 75% of the money collected goes to fund grantees outside your diocese, including the terrible organizations we've profiled? So even if your own bishop does a good job vetting local grants, your money is still flowing to pro-abortion marxist organizations.

For this reason, we are asking individual bishops to completely withdraw from the CCHD, refusing to send in any money for the national collection, and work towards the CCHD being shut down altogether.

Please SIGN and SHARE this important petition today. Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

WATCH Lepanto Institute's new video, 'Catholic Bishops Give $50k to Abortion Advocates' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24212WlPu08&feature=youtu.be

'US bishops’ charity arm caught funding pro-abortion Planned Parenthood partner' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishops-charity-arm-caught-funding-pro-abortion-planned-parenthood-partner

'US bishops’ charity arm caught funding promoters of abortion, LGBT activism' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-bishops-charity-arm-caught-funding-promoters-of-abortion-lgbt-activism

  Hide Petition Text

Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka, the executive director of UN Women – the agency that has often promoted “sexual and reproductive health services” – was also online. She has repeatedly asked for the recognition of “reproductive rights” for women, in particular during the Zika epidemic. She also joined International Safe Abortion Day on Twitter by pointing out how many women die of unsafe abortion.

Another UN agency leader, Natalia Kanem, the executive director of the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), also spoke during the hourlong forum. She was presented as having “over 30 years of strategic leadership experience in the field of preventative medicine, public and reproductive health, social justice and philanthropy.” She spoke out against “domestic violence,” calling for “peace in the home” that is more difficult to obtain because of COVID restrictions. But she never criticized the restrictions themselves.

Ambassador Susan Esserman spoke out against human sex and labor trafficking in the lockdown era now that traffickers are using “modern communications technologies” to keep their business afloat. She was presented as having “previously served in four senior positions in the Clinton administration.”

The last lady to speak – after a lengthy succession of platitudes that to date has obtained 53 views on YouTube  – was also the most typical of the Human Fraternity mindset. Azza Karam, a former senior adviser on culture at the UNFPA who now serves at as the secretary-general of Religions for Peace and appeared on screen with an Islamic veil, gave a passionate talk that stated in plain terms what the meeting was actually about.

Karam called the Human Fraternity Document “in itself seminal in the fact that the Catholic pope and the Muslim grand imam together put these words and these commitments in the document of human fraternity.” She added, “It is historic in every possible sense: social, political, cultural … It is a tremendously powerful document. Why? Not because the words in it are new in any way, shape or form, but because it is a commitment from two leading men of two of the largest religious establishments of the world, al-Azhar and the Vatican, and the fact that they, some 75 years after the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, can actually iterate, reiterate these points in a document in which they commit to the fraternity of humanity. That in and of itself is a remarkably valuable point.”

This makes very clear that she considers the Abu Dhabi Document to be a shift from traditional beliefs and thinking to the universal humanist, not to say Masonic approach, of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Karam added, “It happened to come just before we had the Corona COVID pandemic … God works in mysterious ways as they say. We have an opportunity to celebrate – not just to call upon because it’s already there – but to celebrate the fact that the world's two largest religious institutions, which between them have billions of believers, have actually been able to reiterate finally what we see in the international and universal and indivisible human rights.”

She then quoted a 2019 meeting of 250 faith leaders “across the faith spectrum,” including representatives of the Vatican under the auspices of her own “Religions for Peace” movement, especially commending the fact that the UN Sustainable Development Goals were at the heart of their commitments, with “gender equality” and “women’s empowerment” as the fore.

Karam was the only speaker to slam “authoritarianism” used by “several regimes” in the name of “protection” against COVID, but the brunt of her speech involved calling on “religious and secular civic spaces” to work together. She regretted that the first “multi-religious humanitarian fund” launched by Religions for Peace did not generate a great deal of donations.

Responding to the COVID crisis, she remarked, “We notice that the Catholics works separately, the Protestants work separately, the Muslims work separately, the Muslim Shia work separately … We cannot afford to let the religions respond to the humanitarian emergency separately, we must encourage and support them to work together with one another and to work with the secular institutions.”

Ultimately, this means a rejection of religious identity when all are expected to bring the same response with the same objectives.
She gave the example of the Evangelical camp hospital set up in Central Park in New York.

“When two other religious organizations approached it and said, ‘We’d like to help you, we’d like to support this,’ they were told 'no thank you, we've got this.' But nobody's got this and no one religious institution and no one political institution has got this and the fact that we can even say that to one another when there is an offer of assistance shows that we're going down a very dangerous path indeed.” 

Her comments are revealing about the true aims of people who want religions to be at “peace” with one another. The groups that wanted to “help” were LGBT activists, who refused to sign the statement of faith that the pro-life and anti-gay “marriage” Evangelical group Samaritan’s Purse require all of its staff to sign.

All religions working together means putting a damper on one’s beliefs in the name of diversity and togetherness.

Karam concluded, “It is high time that we work to bridge the divide between secular and religious and to ensure that the religions work systematically together. Help us, as we do with our Higher Committee on Human Fraternity, work with Religions for Peace, the United Nations of religions. It has every single religious institution and faith community represented. Help us work together, help us make sure that the religious women of this world who are 80 percent of the service deliverers across the world in humanitarian emergencies and otherwise, help us make sure that they are well served by all of us together.”

This is one more step toward global spirituality by way of “horizontal” objectives: material peace, material health, and material well-being.

Featured Image

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.