FRESNO, California (LifeSiteNews) – Attorneys representing 14 families are bringing wrongful-death claims against three California hospitals for giving their loved ones the controversial drug Remdesivir for COVID-19 without proper informed consent.
The Epoch Times reported that on August 30 the law firm of Watkins & Letofsky, LLP and Cornerstone attorney Michael Hamilton announced they would be bringing cases against Saint Agnes Medical Center, Community Regional Medical Center, and Clovis Community Medical Center on behalf of 14 families.
The suits, which were filed September 7 in the Superior Court of California in Fresno County, allege that their loved ones were given Remdesivir without being adequately informed of its warning signs, such as a December 2019 study from the New England Journal of Medicine, in which use of the drug was suspended after more than half the Ebola patients who took it died.
Charging the hospitals with fraudulent concealment leading to wrongful death, violation of the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act, medical negligence leading to wrongful death, and medical battery leading to wrongful death, the lawsuits claim that the hospitals subjected patients to a “Remdesivir Protocol” under which someone who seeks treatment for an unrelated issue is diagnosed with COVID or “COVID pneumonia,” then separated from family members and told Remdesivir is their only option.
“They are placed on a BiPap machine at a high rate, making it difficult for them to breathe,” the suit alleges. “Their hands are often tied down so they can’t take the BiPap machine off their face.” If and when this setup agitates them, they are sedated. From there, they are allegedly given inadequate nourishment, intubated, and eventually die, all without the ability to contact anyone outside the hospital or have their treatment changed.
Such treatment is perpetuated by financial incentives, according to Hamilton, who is also with the Truth for Health Foundation.
“If you bring them into the hospital and treat them as a non-complex COVID patient, the average charge rate is $111,000,” Hamilton said at a September 7 press conference. “However, if you treat them as a complex COVID patient, which means you have to either intubate them or put them in intensive care, by definition they become complex, and for that the average charge rate is roughly $450,000.”
“So you can see why there’s a great incentive not to just give them something that works and send them home, but to actually bring them in, find a way to intubate them, call it a complex case, and get $500,000 instead of $3,200,” he added. “That’s a tremendous financial incentive.”
Constable Helen Grus has twice been targeted by her own Ottawa Police Department for holding “anti-vaccine and anti-mask views” — and has now been suspended for standing for the truth about possibly fatal COVID vaccine effects on infants.
CONST. GRUS IS BEING SILENCED FOR INVESTIGATING THE TRUTH SURROUNDING A DEAD CHILD! SEND HER SUPPORT ASAP — DO NOT LET HER BE SILENCED BY OTTAWA POLICE!
Const. Grus has been a stalwart defender of medical freedom and transparency, serving as just one of a small handful of officers who have bravely stood up against Canada’s unrelenting enforcement of COVID vaccines and mandates.
However, the Ottawa Police Department has now suspended Const. Grus for investigating a possible link between several infant deaths and COVID vaccines. The suspension comes despite police officers regularly asking other citizens for their vaccine status — it seems the question is verboten only when the establishment is uncomfortable.
But before Const. Grus could continue her work into this disturbing pattern, the Ottawa Police quickly banned and suspended her from discovering the vaccination statuses of additional parents who have lost infants.
THAT’S WHY WE NEED YOU TO SPREAD THE WORD — SUPPORT CONST. GRUS AND HER ATTEMPT TO REVEAL THE TRUTH ABOUT COVID VACCINE EFFECTS IN INFANTS!
There is good reason for Const. Grus' suspicions regarding potentially fatal COVID vaccine side effects.
In fact, American-based leading COVID expert, Dr. Peter McCullough, has sounded the alarm against mass-COVID vaccinations twice — and is facing backlash from his own medical profession as well.
There is too much on the line for us to lose this fight for medical transparency. That's why more people MUST hear about Const. Grus’ attempt to uncover the mystery surrounding potentially fatal effects linked to COVID vaccines and suspicious infant deaths.
With enough Canadians spreading the truth first investigated by Const. Grus, we can overcome the mainstream narrative and government censorship surrounding COVID vaccines.
Now is the time to stand together in support of Const. Grus and condemn the Ottawa Police Department's censorship — stand with Const. Grus and her brave attempt for medical transparency and the truth about COVID vaccination!
SIGN & SHOW YOUR SUPPORT FOR CONST. GRUS.
SHARE THIS IMPORTANT MESSAGE & SPREAD THE WORD TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
Const. Grus is a hero for medical freedom and transparency. Stand with her now!
P.S. — The Ottawa Police Department is expecting to quickly silence Const. Grus without the public's knowledge. But with your help spreading this important message, Const. Grus will gain the attention she needs to sound the alarm against potentially fatal effects linked to COVID and suspicious infant deaths. Stand with Const. Grus before Ottawa Police completely silence her!
The suit notes that Remdesivir “received Emergency Use Authorization in or around May of 2020, after being recommended by an [National Institutes of Health] panel that contained nine individuals with financial ties to its creator, Gilead Sciences.” Writing for the Brownstone Institute, Liam Cosgrove added that the NIH “funded trials for remdesivir, still under patent with Gilead, despite being less effective and having more severe side effects than ivermectin,” and that the U.S. Food & Drug Administration “approved remdesivir under EUA despite published trials later stating ‘remdesivir was not associated with statistically significant clinical benefits.’”
“Doctors have a duty to review the literature, especially in an emerging crisis, and to stay abreast of these developing guidelines,” the attorneys argue in a press release. “Safety and avoiding harm should always come first in a clinical environment. Covid-19 has a 99.97% survival rate. Remdesivir decreases this survival rate exponentially. This protocol is cruel, deadly, unnecessary and also, as it turns out, highly financially incentivized.”