News
Featured Image
Dinesh D'Souza, the director of '2,000 Mules'.Shutterstock

WASHINGTON, D.C. (LifeSiteNews) — In a documentary film released last weekend, author Dinesh D’Souza states that cell phone geo-tracking and video surveillance footage has uncovered thousands of illegally cast votes in a wide-scale, coordinated ballot-trafficking scheme conducted during the 2020 presidential election. 

For the 2,000 Mules documentary, D’Souza interviewed Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of the ‘True the Vote‘ advocacy group for election integrity, and Gregg Phillips, an OPSEC (operations security) cyber analyst. According to Engelbrecht and Philips, True the Vote obtained cell phone geo-tracking data for cities in the contested swing states of the 2020 presidential election. They said that, after observing patterns of movement from October 1 of that year until the election, they discovered thousands of cases in which individuals traveled to many mail-in ballot drop boxes within a two-week period.  

In addition, they say that they obtained 4 million minutes of video surveillance footage from the drop box areas for the period leading up to the election. The footage apparently revealed ballot traffickers, called mules, stuffing several ballots into each drop box visited, often very late at night. The mules wore gloves when depositing the ballots and then used their phone to take a photo of the drop box before leaving.  

These ballots are thought to have been obtained from non-profit businesses, which the mules were also observed to have visited en route to the drop boxes. Several of the ballot traffickers stated in interviews that they were paid by these non-profits for each ballot they deposited. 

After 15 months of data analysis that involved combing through the cell phone geo-tracking information and matching it with thousands of hours of video footage, True the Votes conclusions include the following statistics: 

In a count of ballot traffickers who visited at least 10 drop boxes and 5 non-profits, 2,000 mules were discovered in the five key swing states of the election. These mules averaged 38 visits to mail-in drop boxes and 5 illegal ballots per visit, totaling 380,000 illegal votes.  

In Wisconsin, there were 100 mules averaging 28 drop-box visits, totaling 14,000 illegal votes.  

In Michigan, 500 mules averaging 50 drop-box visits, totaling 125,000 illegal votes. 

In Georgia, 250 mules averaging 24 drop-box visits, totaling 30,000 illegal votes. 

In Arizona, 200 mules, averaging 20 drop-box visits, totaling 20,000 illegal votes. 

In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, there were 1,100 mules averaging 50 drop boxes, totaling 275,000 illegal votes. 

According to this calculation of illegal votes, the electoral votes from Michigan and Wisconsin would remain Biden’s, but those of Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania would go to Trump, yielding a result of 279 electoral-college votes for Trump and 259 for Biden. 

However, in a count of ballot traffickers who visited at least 5 drop boxes and 5 non-profits, 54,000 mules were discovered using geo-tracking and video surveillance. When counting an average of only 3 ballots per drop-box visit, the total of illegal ballots rose to over 810,000 illegal votes.  

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Call on Biden to condemn violent pro-abortion rioters across America!
  Show Petition Text
21378 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 22500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

In the aftermath of the leak of the Supreme Court majority opinion draft overruling Roe v. Wade, lawless vandals backed by the abortion lobby and pro-abortion politicians have launched riots and violent attacks on pro-life entities across America, from pregnancy centers to churches, and even targeted Justices' homes. 

This widespread, organized effort not only sets a dangerous standard for how groups and individuals may opt to stage demonstrations going forward, but begs the question of how the pro-abortion crowd would behave if and when the Supreme Court officially overturns Roe later this summer.

And, worst of all, the White House has largely turned a blind eye to these riots, with Joe Biden -- who at one time claimed to be personally opposed to abortion due to his Catholic faith -- now acting as the foremost advocate for unfettered abortion access in America.

Biden's nonexistent response must be addressed, and the White House needs to know that the American people demand better from their supposed "leader."

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition calling on Joe Biden to stop beating around the bush and finally issue a formal statement condemning the violent riots and attacks on pro-life institutions across our country in the wake of the leaked Supreme Court majority opinion draft overturning Roe v. Wade.

Over Mother's Day weekend, pro-abortion attacks broke out across America, with increasingly depraved activists targeting pregnancy centers, pro-life advocacy organizations, and churches with either disruptive demonstrations or, in some cases, vandalism and outright violence.

Among the most barbaric occurrences was the vicious attack on Wisconsin Family Action, a pro-life group headquartered in Madison, where vandals threw a Molotov cocktail into an office window, started a fire on one of its walls, and left a threatening graffiti message reading "If abortions aren't safe then you aren't either."

Review a FULL LIST of other appalling attacks HERE.

They even descended upon the homes of Supreme Court Justices like Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Chief Justice John Roberts, who appear poised to formally issue the final blow to Roe v. Wade in the coming weeks, after publishing a map with their private addresses.

The case, which was decided nearly 50 years ago in 1973, saw members of the bench fabricate a constitutional "right" to abortion, depriving individual states from crafting their own laws to protect life. However, should Roe, as expected, be overturned, the matter of abortion would be returned to the states, where it always belonged, giving lawmakers the ability to propose legislation that would either place strong restrictions on the procedure or, in some cases, ban it outright.

And while, of course, freedom of speech must be protected and defended for all Americans, demonstrations that devolve into vandalism, rioting, the use of intimidation tactics against members of the judiciary (or anyone else, for that matter), or violence in any form must NEVER be tolerated.

But the White House seems to be taking a different approach...

It wasn't until Monday afternoon that Press Secretary Jen Psaki finally acknowledged the threat posed to Supreme Court Justices by out-of-control pro-abotion activists, claiming that "judges perform an incredibly important function in our society, and they must be able to do their jobs without concern for their personal safety."

This is true, but it took Psaki an entire week to make any semblance of a definitive statement about the White House's position on this urgent matter. In fact, Psaki previously refused to discourage the targeting of Justices' homes when asked, insisting that pro-abortion groups were staging "peaceful protests" instead; she even failed to condemn the leak itself -- an unprecedented breach of trust and rejection of institutional norms that could permanently damage the standing of the court and its ability to function as an apolitical body.


And, of course, Joe Biden, himself, has been virtually silent on the matter, failing to effectively speak out against these riots and reassure the American people that those who seek to vandalize property and perpetrate violence will be held legally accountable for their actions by the Department of Justice.

This is entirely unacceptable behavior from a commander-in-chief, and as political allies like Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot (rather ironically) incite insurrection by labeling the Supreme Court's pending decision a "call to arms," the American people must demand that Joe Biden clarify where he stands, and whose side he's really on.
 

The rule of law must be upheld and applied equally, and that means calling out radical anti-life rioters and ensuring there are consequences for their violent outbursts and destruction of property across the country.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition calling on Joe Biden to condemn these rioters, and direct the U.S. Department of Justice to take action that will hold them accountable for their actions under the law.

Thank you!


FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'‘Rise up, fight back’: Pro-abortion protesters descend upon Justice Alito’s house over imminent abortion ruling' (LifeSiteNews)

**Photo Credit:  Shutterstock

  Hide Petition Text

According to True the Vote, in Wisconsin there were 83,565 illegal votes, in Michigan 226,590, in Pennsylvania 209,505, in Georgia 92,670, and in Arizona 207,435. According to these numbers of illegal ballots, all five contested states would have been won by Trump, yielding a tally of 305 electoral-college votes for Trump, and 233 for Biden.  

According to the interview, these numbers come from only the limited amount of research that True the Vote conducted into the most contested cities and states of the 2020 presidential election, using publicly obtainable cell phone geo-tracking together with video surveillance footage of the drop boxes of the locations in question. True the Vote has promised to release in the coming weeks all the information they obtained regarding the non-profits that paid mules to traffic ballots for the election.  

“This was an organized effort to subvert a free and fair election,”Phillips declared.“This is organized crime. You can’t look at this data in its aggregate and believe anything otherwise.” 

The Associated Press (AP) accused the documentary and True the Vote’s research of using “a flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to cast doubt on the results of the 2020 presidential election nearly 18 months after it ended. 

UncoverDC responded to the accusations of false claims issued by the AP fact-check article in a lengthy rebuttal. Against the claim that cell phone geo-tracking was not accurate enough to support True the Vote’s analysis, the rebuttal pointed to a Supreme Court decision about the reliability of just such technology. Its judgment was to the contrary.  

According to UncoverDC:  

In response to the 2016 Supreme Court case, Carpenter v. United States, Justice Roberts wrote a 2018 opinion in which he describes the level of precision tracing afforded by pinging a cellphone using geofencing technology. “Accordingly, when the Government tracks the location of a cell phone,” writes Roberts, “It achieves near perfect surveillance as if it had attached an ankle monitor to the phone’s user.” 

The Epoch Times gave the evidence presented in the documentary serious attention, drawing attention to the fact that the research of True the Vote prompted the State of Georgia, on April 25 of this year, to launch an investigation into ballot trafficking in the 2020 election. The Washington Times also published an opinion piece favorable toward the documentary. Other media reactions can be viewed here. 

The documentary movie may be bought or rented at 2000mules.com. 

 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

3 Comments

    Loading...