News
Featured Image
UN World Food Program director David BeasleyUnited Nations / YouTube

NEW YORK, N.Y. December 8, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — The executive director of the United Nations World Food Program has warned that 270 million people are “marching to the brink of starvation.” 

On Friday David Beasley, formerly a Republican governor of South Carolina, presented his findings to the U.N. General Assembly during a special session dedicated to the challenges presented by the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. 

“2021 is literally going to be catastrophic based on what we’re seeing at this stage of the game,” Beasley said. 

He reminded his hearers that he had warned the U.N. Security Council in April that that if the world was not careful the lockdown “cure” for COVID-19 “could be worse than the disease because of the economic ripple.” 

“Back in April, the number of people marching to the brink of starvation had already risen from 80 million to 135 million in the last four years,” he said, indicating that this was primarily because of war and bad weather. 

“But because of COVID, it’s now spiking from 135 million—not going to be bed hungry, now, literally marching towards starvation—to 270 million people.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: No to government and corporate penalties for refusing COVID-19 vaccine
  Show Petition Text
102829 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

                                                                                                                      **Photo credit: Shutterstock.com

Mainstream media sources are promoting offensive suggestions by some doctors that people who refuse a vaccine for COVID-19 should be "punished" by the government and by business - effectively coercing them into taking the vaccine.

  • One group of doctors writing in 'USA Today' suggested that the government impose special taxes (i.e., fines) on people who refuse the vaccination and that business simply refuse to serve them. [see story below]
  • Another doctor writing in an online publication called 'The Conversation' shamelessly suggested that people who refuse a vaccine should be given a psychoactive drug to induce compliance. [see story below]

But, these suggestions are plain political posturing, and have nothing to do with science or with the recent trends of the disease.

And, in case they haven't noticed, we live in a democracy not a medical dictatorship!

Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks policy-makers and business people, at all levels, to pledge to respect the rights of those who, in good conscience, decide not to vaccinate themselves or their children.

People should not have to live in fear of governmental or corporate retribution for refusing a vaccine which is being rushed to market by Big Pharma and their fellow-travelers in NGOs, like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

It would be intolerable and immoral for the government or business to coerce someone, and their family, to take a COVID vaccine against their will to avoid a fine, or just so they can do their weekly grocery shopping.

Medical freedom must be respected in principle and also in practice.

So, it is now time that our policy-makers listen to all voices involved in this vital conversation, and start to represent those who will not tolerate being punished for refusing a vaccine.

Simply put, legislatures must begin to act as legislatures again.

Questions must be asked. Hearings and investigations must be held. And, the legislatures of each state and country must return to the business of representing the people who voted for them, assuming their rightful place as the originator of legislation.

We can no longer accept the dictates of executive branches without question, especially now that, statistically speaking, the initial brunt of the COVID crisis has passed.

Neither can we accept the dictates of doctors who seem detached from reality and from science, and who only seem to be attached to the idea of promoting ideas which contribute to the agrandizement of power and control of political interests, and wealth of those who stand to make a lot of money from the sale of a COVID vaccine.

Please SIGN this urgent petition which asks government and business leaders to pledge to respect the rights of those who refuse a COVID vaccine, and not seek to punish them for doing so.

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'Doctors lay out plan to ‘punish’ people who refuse coronavirus vaccine: ‘There is no alternative’' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/doctors-lay-out-plan-to-punish-people-who-refuse-coronavirus-vaccine-there-is-no-alternative

'US professor: ‘Psychoactive pill’ should be covertly administered to ensure lockdown compliance' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/us-professor-ensure-lockdown-compliance-by-drugging-dissenters-with-psychoactive-pill

  Hide Petition Text

In April, Beasley said he had said that if the world “acted strategically and effectively” it would be able to avert famine, destabilization, and migration. World leaders had responded with stimulus packages, he said, and had helped to “stabilize” the world for now. However, he believes that 2021 is “literally going to be catastrophic.” 

“We spent 19 trillion dollars, [and] that money may not and will not most likely be available for 2021,” he said.

“Economic contraction is taking place, and the needs have doubled.” 

However, if the World Food Program gets the funds it needs, Beasley promises that they will be about to avert famine, destabilization and migration. 

“We got to be out there sooner than later,” he warned. “We already have famine knocking on the door of a dozen countries. We’re talking about in the next few months.” 

He added that 2021 is going to be “the worst humanitarian crisis since the beginning of the United Nations.” 

“We’re going to have to step up,” Beasley said.

“We’re not going to be able to fund everything, so we have to prioritize, as I say, the icebergs in front of the Titanic.”

These icebergs are famine, destabilization and mass migration. In an interview at the end of November, the World Food Program (WFP) chief indicated that it is cheaper to support a person in their own impoverished or war-torn country than as a refugee in Europe. 

“You know, when you go back to the Syrian war, the European leaders did not step in at the right time, at the right place, and they paid a severe price,” Beasley told CBS’s Margaret Brennan.  

“Syria was a nation of about 20 million people. The cost of supporting the Syrian in Syria is about 50 cents per day. That same Syrian ends up in Berlin or Brussels or London, it is 50 to 100 euros per day,” he continued. 

“And we know that people don't want to leave home. But if they don't have food and they don't have some degree of peace and stability, they will do what any of us would do for our children. So it's a lot cheaper to come in and prevent the destabilization than it is to have war and conflict afterwards.” 

“It is cheaper to go in and feed people where they are.”

Beasley said that 30 million people currently depend “100%” on the WFP, and added that the program assists 100 million people on any given day. The WFP supports people in three dozen countries. Meanwhile, U.S. tax payers are its biggest donors.

“[…] The United States has always been the most generous nation on Earth,” Beasley said. 

“And I don't expect the United States to back down now, because it's going to be a lot cheaper to come in and do it right and prevent a lot of migration and a lot of destabilization and, in fact, a lot of deaths from hunger.”

“People are dying now. About every five seconds a child dies from hunger.”

However, Beasley is not relying solely on the average American taxpayer. 

“We’re going to have to ask the billionaires to step up in a way they’ve never done before,” he said.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.