News
Featured Image
 Klemen Misic / Shutterstock.com

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

OMAHA, Nebraska (LifeSiteNews) – An Ohio judge has extended a temporary injunction allowing unvaccinated airmen to work, just days after they filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Air Force.

On July 27, Judge Matthew McFarland with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division published his ruling granting 36 Nebraska and Kansas airmen relief from the Air Force’s vaccine mandate, as reported by KETV NewsWatch 7.

“Due to the systematic nature of what the Court views as violations of Airmen’s constitutional rights to practice their religions as they please, the Court is well within its bounds to extend the existing preliminary injunction to all Class Members,” the injunction read.

“You’re taught from a very young age that no matter who you are, you stand up for what you believe in,” Master Sgt. Josh Welter, an unvaccinated airman stationed in Nebraska, told KETV NewsWatch 7.

“Men and women in the service have been fighting this fight under-wraps and not in the public eye,” he added. “To get my story out and to share the persecution we’ve gone through over the last year — is great and I’m glad that relief and stress has been taken off servicemembers’ shoulders.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
100164 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

This decision comes just days after the 36 unvaccinated airmen filed a lawsuit in the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals against the Air Force’s mandatory vaccination policy after being refused religious exemptions. The case is slated to be heard in September.

The Air Force boasts a 97% vaccination rate. While 9,665 religious exemptions requests in the U.S. Air Force have been filed, only 118, or about 1.2%, have been approved.

According to the lawsuit, “The Airmen are now being denied the very liberty they pledged to protect. Each has a sincere religious objection to receiving a COVID-19 vaccination.”

“It has no place in the United States of America where we founded this country on religious freedom,” stated Kris Kobach, the attorney who represents the airmen.

“They’ve granted a handful to people, but only ones who’re already leaving the Air Force. They haven’t granted a single one purely based on the religious exemption request,” Kobach said.

According to Kobach, the cases may be merged and be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

If the Air Force allows them to remain unvaccinated, the airmen have agreed to partake in testing, isolation, remote work, social distancing, masking, or other requirements.

Currently, every available COVID-19 vaccine either contains aborted fetal cells or has been tested on fetal cell lines.

Biologist and author Pamela Acker stated that babies used in vaccine research and production must be alive at the time of tissue extraction. She also revealed that the babies are denied anesthetics and thereby subjected to torture before ultimately being killed.

Dr. Stanley Plotkin, considered the Godfather of Vaccines, admitted that, “Hundreds if not thousands of babies were aborted in the process of bringing vaccines to market.”

In a 2020 interview, prominent theologian and exorcist Father Chad Ripperger described abortion-tainted vaccines as “ongoing theft” of babies’ bodies.

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...