Featured Image
 Children's Health Defense

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder

(Children’s Health Defense) – In the largest study of its kind to date, 42 percent of women who were menstruating regularly reported breakthrough bleeding after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine

Study participants, who did not normally menstruate – including women on long-acting contraceptives and post-menopausal women – also experienced unusual bleeding.

Researchers in April 2021 launched the survey after thousands of women reported changes to their menstrual cycles and unusual bleeding after getting vaccinated.

The survey sample included 39,129 currently and formerly menstruating participants between the ages of 18 and 80 who were fully vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson (J&J), Novavax, or AstraZeneca COVID vaccines and had not previously had COVID-19.

Researchers collected data for three months to provide clinicians and the public with a description of trends.

According to the results of the survey, published last week in the journal Science Advances, 42 percent of women with regular menstrual cycles bled more heavily than usual after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

Among respondents who typically do not menstruate, 71 percent of people on long-acting contraceptives, 39 percent of people on gender-affirming hormones, and 66 percent of postmenopausal women reported breakthrough bleeding.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
103230 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

“We found that increased/breakthrough bleeding was significantly associated with age, systemic vaccine side effects (fever and/or fatigue), history of pregnancy or birth and ethnicity,” researchers wrote.

Respondents reported noticing changes to their period 1 to 7 days after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine (dose 1: 31.4 percent; dose 2: 37.0 percent), 8 to 14 days after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine (dose 1: 25.9 percent; dose 2: 23.6 percent) or more than 14 days after being vaccinated (dose 1: 29.9 percent; dose 2: 26.8 percent).

The remainder of the respondents said they were menstruating at the time of vaccination (dose 1: 12.7 percent; dose 2: 12.5 percent).

In total, 42.1 percent of respondents reported heavier menstrual flow after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, 14.3 percent reported their periods were “not heavier,” which was characterized by a mix of lighter or no change and 43.6 percent reported no change to flow.

Researchers found a heavier menstrual flow was more likely in respondents who were of non-white race, were Hispanic, were older, had a diagnosed reproductive condition, used hormonal contraception, were pregnant in the past – whether or not they had given birth – and those who had given birth or experienced a fever or fatigue after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

Researchers said the combination of a reproductive history that includes being pregnant but not giving birth in the past is associated with the highest risk of heavier flow, although having been pregnant and giving birth was also associated with a heavier flow.

Among non-menstruating, premenopausal women on hormonal treatments, 65.7 percent experienced breakthrough bleeding after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

Among postmenopausal women who had not bled for at least 12 months and were not on any hormonal treatments, breakthrough bleeding was reported by 66 percent of respondents. According to the authors, vaccine trial protocols do not typically monitor for major adverse events for more than seven days, and additional follow-up communications do not inquire about menstrual cycles or bleeding.

As a result, manufacturers failed to address whether the changes were coincidental or a potential side effect of the vaccines.

“In media coverage, medical doctors and public health experts hastened to say that there was ‘no biological mechanism’ or ‘no data’ to support a relationship between vaccine administration and menstrual changes,” the researchers wrote. “In other cases, experts declared that these changes were more likely a result of stress.”

Researchers emphasized that “menstrual bleeding changes of this nature are generally not indicative of changes to fertility,” although the survey did not examine the effects of COVID-19 vaccines or menstrual changes triggered by the vaccines on fertility, nor did the clinical trials of U.S.-authorized vaccines PfizerModernaJ&J and Novavax adequately assess the effects of their products on fertility, as the companies’ own documents indicate.

“Because the study relied on self-reported experiences logged more than 14 days after vaccination, it cannot establish causality or be seen as predictive of people in the general population,” co-author Katharine Lee, an anthropology professor at Tulane University, said in a press release.

“But it can point to potential associations between a person’s reproductive history, hormonal status, demographics, and changes in menstruation following COVID-19 vaccination.”

Experts: survey findings are ‘concerning’

Dr. Christiane Northrup, a board-certified OB/GYN physician and New York Times best-selling author, found the results of the survey concerning.

Northrup told The Defender:

“A group of us from Millions Against Medical Mandates noticed that women who were simply around those who had recently had this inoculation were having bleeding problems. Little girls visiting recently inoculated grandparents were having vaginal bleeding. There are even VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] reports of little girls dying from vaginal hemorrhaging just from being around those who had the shot. And that’s why we created My Cycle Story.

We just recently got all that data published – mostly in terms of the enormous increase of decidual cast shedding in women who had just been around those who had had the shot.”

Northrup said there were 40 cases spanning 109 years of decidual cast shedding in the world literature and “I think we had more than 292 cases reported over 7.5 months in 2021.”

According to Northrup, a group of people, including Brian Hooker, Ph.D., Tiffany Parotto and Dr. James Thorp ­– who specializes in internal fetal medicine – got together to analyze the data from My Cycle Story.

“We had about 6,000 women fill out our survey,” Northrup said. “Most of them had not had the shot. So the new data that those who’ve had the shot are having menstrual difficulties does not surprise us at all, and they have not referred to our early data.”

She added:

“We see this as a massive problem because we know that the lipid nanoparticles in the shot or in the shedding go to the ovaries at 64 times the concentration of other organs, so we are very concerned about future fertility.”

In their research, Northrup and others hypothesized that the COVID-19 vaccine “interrupts the complex balance of ovulation orchestrated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and thus produces anovulatory bleeding disorders.”

“It is known from COVID-19 mRNA vaccine documents that there is concentration of the nanolipid particles and the mRNA cargo in the ovaries,” they stated. “This produces a significant inflammatory response in the ovaries and could contribute to menstrual abnormalities, although there are many other potential mechanisms that could be involved.”

As The Defender reported last year, there are many ways vaccination could alter menstruation – a process that relies on the immune system.

Dr. Lawrence Palevsky – a licensed pediatrician and member of the independent research group collecting data from unvaccinated women who experienced menstrual changes after being around others who recently received COVID-19 vaccines – said a necessary study would examine the contents of the injection, assess the chemical natures of the content, and analyze their effects on human physiology and women’s reproductive systems.

Palevsky told The Defender he believes the spike protein could play a role in the menstrual irregularities women are reporting, along with “other factors we may not know because no one is doing the appropriate research.”

© July 19, 2022. Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

Help Jenny Porter recover from her vaccine injury: LifeFunder