News
Featured Image
Bill GatesMike Cohen / Getty Images for The New York Times

ANALYSIS

May 18, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — While billionaire globalist Bill Gates has been hailed in the past year as a generous and exceptionally knowledgeable man regarding COVID-19, deeper research reveals a darker side of his character, his desires for control over the globe in a manner drawn from much-criticized eugenic policies, as well as disturbing links to self-confessed sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The 65-year-old founder of Microsoft is hailed throughout the world as a kind-hearted philanthropist, thanks in great part to the media frontage and the constant promotion which he enjoys. During the recent COVID-19 times, he has been consulted as if an eminent scientist, capable of solving the apparent crisis, and providing timelines for the world’s return to normality.

However, overlooked investigations and evidence present a darker side, and perhaps a more honest appraisal of Gates. A well-documented Corbett Report from May 2020 has provided evidence which the mainstream media has largely overlooked in its praise of Gates, but which is corroborated in various reports.

Most generous person on earth’ or ruthless profit seeker?

Gates has been hailed as the “best businessman of our century,” founding “one of the greatest companies of the 20th century,” namely Microsoft. However, the launch of Microsoft was surrounded by a number of circumstances which paint a different picture of the generous genius.

Gates’s success cannot be solely attributed to himself, as his mother played a key role in launching his career, by lobbying International Business Machines (IBM) on her son’s behalf.

The New York Times reported in 1994 that following this, in 1981 IBM then “took a chance by hiring Microsoft,” after weighing up the company against a number of competitors.

In 2000, the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) described how Microsoft then spent four years working with IBM in developing a software operating system, OS/2, but on the same day it launched, Microsoft launched its own platform of Windows 2.0. Microsoft claimed it was merely acting defensively, yet critics accused the company of double-crossing IBM.

A number of software companies also attack Microsoft for having a ruthless drive for business. Such companies needed Microsoft’s help to “craft programs,” since Microsoft owned the operating system, but Microsoft was simultaneously making competing software, leading to complaints from competitors that “the arrangement allowed it to take advantage of its knowledge of both MS-DOS and competitors’ projects.”

The WSJ wrote that “no company fights as hard or as long (or as ruthlessly) for the smallest slice of market share” as Microsoft.

This business model of profit before all else would seem to be driving Gates throughout his career, including in his more recent foray into the world of healthcare innovation. In practice, he has hardly been an altruistic person and champion of those in need, and instead a life-long eugenicist with a racist, Planned Parenthood population control family history.

As Dr. Mercola wrote, Gates does not practice philanthropy, but rather “philanthrocapitalism.” Not only does Gates wield incredible influence in the tech and vaccine world, but Mercola noted that he also mirrors this power in “agriculture and food policy (including biopiracy and fake food), weather modification and other climate technologies, surveillance, education and media.”

This was supported by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who wrote that Gates practices “weaponized philanthropy,” a tactic he employed “to resuscitate his reputation after the Microsoft antitrust case exposed him as a lying, cheating, thieving, manipulator intent on felonious monopoly control of global information conduits.” With Gates’s own personal net worth increasing to nearly $130 billion, his much advertised “philanthropy” has proven to be personally profitable.

The accumulation of wealth comes at a cost, although not to Gates himself. In 2004 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) partnered with the Rockefeller Foundation in the $424 million Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA), supposedly to increase food productivity and incomes, while lowering food insecurity. Gates forced the local farmers to abandon their traditional techniques, and instead use imported commercial seeds, petroleum fertilizers and pesticides, for which he supplied the infrastructure.

He also pressured African governments into large spending and made them use draconian penalties and authoritarian control to force farmers to buy his expensive inputs and comply with his diktats.

Nutrition and productivity dramatically declined, and a 2020 report, “False Promises: The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)” revealed that in the countries Gates selected, extreme hunger had increased by 30%.

The Corbett Report noted that “the 9,000,000 people who die every year of hunger would be best served by securing food supplies, running water and other basic necessities, not costly medical interventions for rare diseases. But there is no return on investment to be made from that kind of charity.”

Gates the ruler of the world

Gates’s desire for control seems to have grown exponentially since his early days building a software empire. His influence is seemingly in all crucial areas of life: lobbying and controlling organizations such as the World Health Organization; quietly building up an empire of land ownership, now being the largest private owner of farmland in the U.S.; calling for nations to abandon their eating habits, and ditch meat in favor of chemical alternatives; fear-mongering and lobbying entire nations into “climate change”-oriented policies; controlling populations by declaring that life will not return to normal after COVID, until the world is “widely vaccinated.”

As noted by the Corbett Report, Gates is also intent on controlling identities, through the imposition of an all-encompassing ID system, and ensuring that all financial transactions are conducted through the purview and control of the mainstream monetary sphere, as opposed to novel, purely digital systems which are much harder to “track.”

“No, this is not about charity. It is about control,” declared the Corbett Report.

Robert Kennedy recently reported on the effect which Gates’s so called “charity” for the global health was actually having. “The global lockdowns that Bill Gates helped orchestrate and cheerlead have bankrupted more than 100,000 businesses in the U.S. alone and plunged a billion people into poverty and deadly food insecurity that, among other devastating harms, kill 10,000 African children monthly — while increasing Gates’ wealth by $20 billion.”

Gates working from eugenicist policies

As Gates’s control over the global population expands almost exponentially, thanks especially due to COVID-related measures, the Corbett Report pointed to a possible explanation for the desire for such control.

The Gates family long had an interest in the subject of population control and reproductive health. In 1998, a Salon report noted that Gates Sr. was on the board of Planned Parenthood, and Gates himself stated that his father was “head of Planned Parenthood,” a role which he described a controversial at the time, but “fascinating.”

Population control and reproductive health were both terms born out of the terminology of eugenics, the pseudoscience which holds that certain people deserve to lead while others deserve to serve, based on genetics. Eugenicists even wished to kill people they deemed to be of no use to society, and to spend world resources on the preservation of the upper classes, the rich, intelligent, useful members of society, instead of the poorer sectors.

The famous Rockefeller family was heavily committed to the eugenic movement. Rockefellers helped fund the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), and the founding director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research sat on ERO’s board. The Rockefeller family heavily funded — and was personal friends with — the eugenicist pioneer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger. It was with substantial Rockefeller support that Sanger’s “Negro Project” was rolled out, with her professed aim being “to exterminate the Negro population.”

Rockefellers also sponsored eugenics studies at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany, including the man who later drafted the Nazi forced sterilization law: Hence, the family commitment to the eugenic cause was no mere passing incident.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Dump Facebook and Big Tech for threatening our democracy and freedom of speech!
  Show Petition Text
80756 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 90000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

PETITION UPDATE (5/5/2021) - BREAKING: Facebook permanently removes LifeSiteNews’ page

Facebook has just permanently banned LifeSiteNews’ Facebook page. This apparently is not a temporary measure: It is gone for good.

"Much like when LifeSite was removed from YouTube, this comes with little surprise,” noted LifeSiteNews Marketing Director Rebekah Roberts.

"Facebook has been silencing any voice that goes against their beliefs and agenda," continued Roberts. "Our LifeSiteNews Facebook page has been removed simply because we have shared reports of doctors, nurses, expert researchers, and even the former Pfizer VP speaking out against the COVID shots. We’ve also been tagged for the numerous articles we have shared making the connection between the COVID shots, and really all vaccines, and aborted baby cell lines."

"This all comes down to another case of Big Tech silencing free speech on their platform," she added.

"At this time, I encourage those of you who are still on Facebook, Twitter, and other Big Tech platforms to continue sharing LifeSiteNews articles with your friends and family, please!” urged Roberts. “I also encourage you to follow us on these alternative platforms:"

Telegram: https://t.me/lifesitetelegram

Gab: https://gab.com/LifeSiteNews

MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/lifesitenewscom1

Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNews

Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/lifesitenews

The absolute best way to connect with LifeSiteNews is to subscribe to our daily news emails, click here

Thank you for SIGNING and SHARING this petition, vital to our freedom of speech.

_____________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (2/23/21) - 

LifeSite has signed on to a Media Research Center (MRC) letter to all 50 state Attorneys General, calling for an investigation into Big Tech.

Google, Facebook, and Twitter have monopolized the industry, and are using their influence to collect user data, suppress content, and silence those who voice ideas and beliefs counter to their own.

As we urged prior, action must be taken to combat these efforts, and that is why we’ve joined the MRC in this fight.

Please take a couple of minutes to READ this LifeSiteNews article about MRC's initiative: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/lifesite-joins-effort-asking-state-attorneys-general-to-investigate-big-tech-for-deceptive-trade-practices

Then, please SIGN and STOP using Twitter, Facebook, Google (YouTube) and Amazon to take back your privacy and freedom of speech!

________________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (2/9/21) -

YouTube just completely removed the LifeSiteNews YouTube channel. This isn’t a ban, every single one of our videos is completely gone. Being completely removed from YouTube means we’ve lost access to 300,000+ followers.

This is the latest and appalling affront to free speech which is happening to many conservative and Christian organizations.

Please SIGN this petition and STOP using YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, Google (owner of YouTube) and Amazon to take back your privacy and freedom of speech!

We are not going to take this lying down!

Thankfully, we have backups of all our videos:

You can watch our current videos on Rumble, here: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNews
Or on our LifeSiteNews Catholic Rumble channel, here: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNewsCatholic

You can also sign-up to receive email alerts about our recent videos here: https://bit.ly/LifeSiteVideoSub

Please help us build Rumble and our other alternative platforms by donating through our secure link: https://give.lifesitenews.com/

After you SIGN this petition, please also see our 'Goodbye Google' resources to find out how to quit Big Tech and learn more about good alternatives!

____________________________________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (1/26/20) -

Twitter has again locked LifeSiteNews out of two of our accounts on the platform for displaying a message noting that President Joe Biden’s newly named Assistant Secretary of Health “Rachel” Levine is a man.

Both accounts displayed a simple message which read: “Biden names transgender ‘woman’ as Assistant Secretary of Health. ‘Rachel’ Levine is a father of two who divorced his wife in 2013 after 30 years of marriage.” The tweets also included a link to LifeSite’s article Biden names transgender ‘woman’ as Assistant Secretary of Health, and contained part of the opening sentence of that article, “Joe Biden has announced his intention to appoint a gender-confused man” as Assistant Secretary of Health.

For stating biological or Biblical truths, Twitter and Big Tech are trying to shut down conservative voices.

Therefore, it is now more important than ever to consider dumping Twitter, Google (who own YouTube) and Facebook. To be clear: LifeSite is still using Twitter and Big Tech to encourage others to migrate away from these illiberal platforms.

This is not the first time that LifeSiteNews has been censored by Twitter. In December 2019, Twitter indefinitely suspended our account for a tweet that linked to an article on transgender activist Jonathan “Jessica” Yaniv.

At the time, Twitter gave LifeSite the option to delete the tweet and reactivate our account right away. LifeSite remained steadfast that the tweet did not violate any of the company’s “rules and policies,” and sought several appeals with Twitter, while looking into legal action against the company.

And, while LifeSite's account was eventually restored, we must now consider what course of action we will pursue in this case, over and above appealing the ban.

Meanwhile, since taking office on Wednesday last week, Joe Biden has already signed an executive order which will force women’s athletic programs, restrooms, and locker rooms to be open to men. He has also turned back the Trump administration’s policy protecting women’s sports programs in schools.

Last week, LifeSite was banned for two weeks from our YouTube channel, after the site determined that one of our videos about vaccines violated YouTube’s “community guidelines.” We are also in the middle of appealing this ban.

Please considering SIGNING and SHARING this petition. Thank you!

__________________________________________________________________________

Twitter just deplatformed President Trump premanently! And, other conservatives, including General Flynn and Sidney Powell, were also summarily deplatformed.

Conservatives, Christians and freedom-loving Americans of all political persuasions must now take a decision to preserve their free speech AND their ability to peaceably assemble by dumping Twitter and Big Tech, and by finding other good alternatives to communicate with each other and share their opinions.

Please SIGN our petition-pledge to Dump Twitter and Big Tech, and take back your freedom of speech and privacy. [CLICK HERE for our "Goodbye Google" resources page to find good alternatives to Twitter, Facebook, Amazon, and Google!]

When you use Twitter or Facebook to communicate, and, or, Google and Amazon to search for something online, these companies can stifle your ability to share your thoughts and opinions and manipulate your search results, threatening your privacy, your freedom of speech, and even our democracy.

Evidence suggests that Twitter and Facebook's 'community guidelines' are selectively enforced against conservatives and Christians, while Google rigs their search algorithms to direct traffic away from conservative and Christian websites, effectively choking traffic to those sites.

Simply put, Twitter, Facebook, Google (who owns YouTube) and Amazon appear to be actively suppressing access to pro-freedom, pro-family and pro-life news and opinion.

Don't contribute to this assault on democracy: Stop using Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon as your default social media platforms and search engine! [CLICK HERE to find a good alternative to Google.]

To repeat: a few liberal and completely unaccountable computer programmers in Silicon Valley are dictating what we do and do not see in our Twitter and Facebook feeds, and in our Google searches.

We, here, at LifeSite, also recently had our Twitter account suspended by the company over "misgendering" a man who claims to be a woman.

LifeSite has also experienced a fall-off in Google search-related traffic since the company updated its search algorithms at the beginning of May.

And, since the November election, Twitter and Big Tech appear to have dramatically INCREASED their censorship of conservatives and Christians as the President Trump disputed the results of the election and when evidence of election fraud began to mount.

Now, it seems likely that they are trying to cut-off conservative leaders (like President Trump) from conservatives on the ground, and effectively exclude us from the national conversation.

But, this tactic will not work. Because Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon are not the only game in town! There are a good number of excellent alternatives which we list in our 'Goodbye Google' Resources page.

The great irony is that, while Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon executives talk a lot about maintaining freedom of speech and diversity, in fact, these hypocrites are ATTACKING free speech point-blank!

This kind of manipulation poses a lethal threat to our democracy, but as we see so clearly now, Twitter and Big Tech have shown no hesitation in excluding conservatives and Christians from the public square.

So, at this point, the only way to stop Twitter, Facebook, Google and Amazon is to quit using their platform.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition to pledge to stop using Twitter and Big Tech. Then, please CLICK HERE to find alternative search engines and social media platforms. Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Follow LifeSiteNews on these alternative channels:

Telegram: https://t.me/lifesitetelegram

Gab: https://gab.com/LifeSiteNews

MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/lifesitenewscom1

Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/LifeSiteNews

Parler: parler.com/profile/lifesitenews (currently down due to Amazon removing their web hosting)

Ready to say "Goodbye Google"? Find alternatives for search engines, browsers, email, and morehttps://lifefacts.lifesitenews.com/goodbye-google/resources/

'BREAKING: Twitter permanently bans President Trump from platform'https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/breaking-twitter-permanently-bans-president-trump-from-platform

WATCH LifeSite's exclusive series - 'Big Tech vs Free Speech' - of interviews with experts on how Big Tech censorship is killing free speechhttps://www.lifesitenews.com/bigtech/

From YouTube to social media and beyond, online censorship is rampant. Read the latest articles covering this ongoing struggle: https://lifefacts.lifesitenews.com/goodbye-google/censorship/

  Hide Petition Text

Corbett noted that “when the American Eugenics Society became embarrassed of its own name, its long-time director, Frederick Osborne, merely took over as president of the Rockefeller-founded Population Council.”

What does the Rockefeller family have to do with Bill Gates? In 2009, Gates’s father, William Gates Sr., penned a book in which he expressed his deep admiration and collaboration with the Rockefeller dynasty.

He wrote that “every corner we’ve turned in the field of global health, we’ve found that the Rockefellers were already there, and had been for years … A lesson that we learned from studying and working with the Rockefellers, is that to succeed in pursuing audacious goals, you need like-minded partners with whom to collaborate.”

The Gates family held true to these words of working with “like-minded partners,” collaborating with the Rockefeller family in a number of high-level enterprises, such as the global vaccine alliance, GAVI. Their close ties were noted by Andreas Moritz in his book Vaccine-Nation: Poisoning the Population, One Shot at a Time, calling the two foundations “old friends and partners.”

Both Gates Sr. and Bill Gates have partnered with the Rockefeller family in academic settings to discuss global policy, most notably in 2009, when Gates and David Rockefeller joined with George Soros, Oprah Winfrey, and Warren Buffet in a meeting discussing population control. Gates, Rockefeller and Buffet have been collectively dubbed “The Good Club.”

The Corbett Report noted the interesting circumstance that “on the anniversary of the First International Eugenics Congress, held in London exactly 100 years prior,” the Gates Foundation organized its London Summit on Family Planning in July 2012, “at which the Gates recommitted themselves to funding population control in the third world.”

A major 2016 report from the Global Policy Forum then noted the huge influence of both foundations, their great similarities, and the dangers which were posed by such power.

The Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation are currently mirroring each other in their call for digital IDs and widespread track and trace in the light of COVID-19, in a move described as “coordinating efforts in the direction of social control.”

Indeed, in many instances of global policy lobbying, funding of NGOs, funding of health care research, population control, climate change policies, the Gates Foundation has simply publicly taken over where the Rockefeller Foundation left off.

Gates has even revealed his own devotion to the topic of so called “death panels,” when he discussed the beneficial trade-offs which were made between choosing whether to fund jobs or provide end of life health care.

Gates and Epstein — a firm friendship and shared ideals

Another aspect of the life of Bill Gates which has been left widely unreported until very recently, is the curious relation he had with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein was arrested and charged in July 2019 with one count of sex trafficking of minors and one count of conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking of minors in a high-profile case that was believed to implicate many prominent figures around the world. He then allegedly killed himself in his cell at New York’s Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in August 2019.

Gates insisted in comments to the Wall Street Journal in 2019 that he did not have any relationship with Epstein at all, and a spokesman for Gates later added that Epstein had sought business relations with Gates, which Gates had rejected.

However, the New York Times reported one month later that Gates had visited Epstein multiple times, even starting his relationship after Epstein had been convicted of sex crimes and served time in jail for soliciting prostitution from a minor.

Indeed, the relationship seems to have been more than a passing acquaintance. In 2011, Gates emailed his staff describing Epstein’s lifestyle as “very different and kind of intriguing although it would not work for me.” Epstein reciprocated the relation, writing in an email that “Bill’s great,” following a meeting of several hours between the pair.

The Corbett Report noted how flight logs reveal that Gates actually flew on Epstein’s infamous “lolita express” plane from New Jersey to Florida, even though Gates has his own private plane. A spokesman for Gates later claimed that Gates did not know whose plane he was on.

Thorbjørn Jagland, the former Prime Minister of Norway, also attested to the lucrative business interests which Epstein and Gates were working on together, saying that at a 2013 meeting held in Jagland’s residence, regarding vaccine production, “Bill Gates and Epstein arrived together, followed by the others.” Norwegian paper DN Magasinet noted that “Epstein, who knew Gates, was the person that introduced the billionaire to IPI [International Peace Institute],” which later partnered with Gates in the “fight against polio.”

However, the Corbett report pointed to another possible shared interest of both Epstein and Gates, the devotion to eugenic policies. Epstein wanted to “seed the human race with his DNA,” looking to advance the policy of transhumanism: the “science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence.”

Such a methodology is, of course, eerily similar to the directives of the Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution, of which Gates is a firm supporter. Epstein’s plan was to use his New Mexico ranch to inseminate numerous women, who would then give birth to his babies.

Epstein’s drive led him to fund research in the matter, including funding the controversial scientist George Church, who has been a longstanding and public advocate of eugenicist policies.

He also acted as scientific advisor to a group looking to eradicate disease by altering genetic codes. Funding for this came from a “group of investors led by Epstein’s appointed backup executor, Dr. Boris Nikolic. Naturally, that group of investors included Bill Gates.”

Boris Nikolic himself appears to have been an important link between Epstein and Gates, for he served as chief scientific advisor to Microsoft and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and was subsequently named as backup executor of Epstein’s will, just days before Epstein was discovered dead in his prison cell.

The Gates divorce unveils hidden secrets about the ‘generous’ Bill Gates

With evidence increasingly proving that Gates and Epstein enjoyed a strong relationship, despite Gates’s protestations to the opposite, new reports suggest that their connection was so strong as to play a part in the now-public divorce proceedings between Bill and Melinda.

In fact, reports are now circulating, indicating Melinda started “exploring options” for divorce when her husband’s connections to the convicted sex offender were made public.

Since at least 2019, Melinda Gates has been working with numerous lawyers from different firms in order to effect the divorce. The Daily Beast reported that a former employee of the Gates Foundation revealed Melinda had expressed her concerns about Epstein to her husband in 2013, who continued his relations with Epstein regardless.

Indeed, far more than this, Gates reportedly took advice from Epstein about how to end the marriage, after Gates complained about his wife and described the marriage as “toxic.” The Daily Beast was informed of this by an individual who attended the meetings, and the report mentioned “dozens” of meetings between Gates and Epstein, not just an occasional meeting.

The two men “were very close,” and Gates discussed how Epstein could even become involved in his foundation.

Aside from this connection to Epstein, Gates had garnered a particular kind of reputation for himself, even before Melinda’s meeting with divorce lawyers in 2019.

According to “people with direct knowledge of his overtures,” Gates “pursued women who worked for him at Microsoft and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”

In 2020, Microsoft board members decreed that Gates step down from the board while an investigation was underway into a previous romantic relationship with a Microsoft employee. In 2019, the Microsoft engineer had penned a letter alleging that she had had a sexual relationship with Gates, lasting years. Gates stepped down from the board before a formal decision could be taken.

A spokeswoman for Gates did not completely deny the allegations, saying instead, “There was an affair almost 20 years ago which ended amicably.” Gates currently serves as technology adviser to Microsoft’s current CEO.

It remains to be seen whether Gates will face any future questioning about his relations with Jeffery Epstein, his own adherence to eugenicist policies, or his reported not infrequent womanizing.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.