‘A lawless state’: Gay ‘marriage’ comes to some New Mexico counties by judicial fiat
ALBUQUERQUE, NM, August 28, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Same-sex “marriage” has come to portions of New Mexico by judicial fiat.
Six of the state's 33 counties – Bernalillo, Doña Ana, San Miguel, Santa Fe, Taos, and Valencia counties – have begun issuing marriage licenses to homosexual couples, some after judicial orders and some voluntarily.
However, state law does not provide for same-sex “marriage.” New Mexico is the only state to have no law either allowing or forbidding such unions.
Without a specific law forbidding gay “marriage,” rogue officials began issuing licenses, and activist judges began ruling that the state's commitment to fighting “discrimination” ipso facto legalizes “marriage equality.”
Last Wednesday, Doña Ana County Clerk Lynn Ellins decided to begin issuing licenses to gay couples, law or no law. By week's end, 137 couples had received the licenses, which substitute “spouse and spouse” for “bride and groom.”
Attorney General Gary King, a Democrat, said, although the rogue action did not have the sanction of law, he would not put a stop to it.
The next day, District Judge Sarah Singleton ruled that Santa Fe County had to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples if asked. The county clerk, Geraldine Salazar, supports redefining marriage and offered no objection.
Singleton's ruling was eclipsed on Friday, when District Judge Alan Malott ordered clerks in Bernalillo County and Santa Fe counties to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
“Gay and lesbian citizens of New Mexico have endured a long history of discrimination," he wrote in a sweeping opinion. Denying homosexuals marriage rights “continues this unfortunate, intolerable pattern” and inflicts an “irreparable injury.”
Again, no parties objected to the ruling.
ACLU attorney Laura Schauer Ives said the group's lawyers – who filed suit on behalf of six lesbian couples – were “stunned and amazed” by the “monumental” ruling.
The homosexual group Why Marriage Matters NM, responded, “We are so happy for the plaintiffs in the ACLU-NM case and all of the same-sex relationships that will begin to receive the respect that they deserve!”
Then on Tuesday, District Judge Jeff McElroy's ruled that Taos County must also provide marriage licenses to all couples who request them, regardless of their sexual composition, unless the county offered a legal reason not to do so.
County clerk Anna Martinez reportedly celebrated McElroy's decision with the plaintiffs.
Having judicial decrees initiate gay unions county-by-county is "pretty unconventional,” ACLU of New Mexico spokesman Micah McCoy said, but “it will be very useful in arguing the case in other counties where people want to get married.”
This week, Valencia County Clerk Peggy Carabajal and San Miguel County Clerk Melanie Rivera began voluntarily issuing marriage licenses to gay couples. Carabajal explained, "We're not going to discriminate against anyone."
The actions have the thinnest veneer of popular support. Doña Ana County commissioners on Tuesday approved a non-binding measure supporting County Clerk Lynn Ellins by a 4-1 vote.
Nonetheless, Governor Susana Martinez, a Republican, has said she will not stop the licenses from being issued, according to the Santa Fe New Mexican.
“We have become a lawless state here as everybody decides they can create whatever law they want to create, apparently out of thin air,” State Senator William Sharer of Farmington told OneNewsNow.com. “The whole idea of a representative government of the people, for the people, and by the people is gone.”
He plans to lead a legislative coalition in a court battle to stop the clerks' actions. He may face an uphill battle, as the state Supreme Court ruled last week that a Christian photographer had no right to refuse to take pictures of a homosexual “wedding.”
Last week's rogue licenses are not a first in state history. Sandoval County Clerk Victoria Dunlap issued more than 60 marriage licenses to same-sex couples in 2004, before then-Attorney General Patricia Madrid halted the process.
“A county clerk cannot make law,” Sharer said. “That is the legislature’s job.”
Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.
State officials have paved the way for same-sex “marriages” in California and Pennsylvania by refusing to defend existing law. The Obama administration similarly refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court.
Now, other state county clerks find themselves caught in the current debate. Lincoln County Clerk Rhonda Burrows said, "It's unfortunately that county clerks have been put in the position of ruling on an issue that should be decided by a court, by the legislature, or by the vote of the people.”
Judge Mallott was appointed by former Governor Bill Richardson, a Democrat. Richardson's predecessor, Republican Gary Johnson, also publicly endorsed same-sex “marriage” last year after winning the Libertarian Party's presidential nomination.
But State Senator Sharer notes that the unchangeable definition of marriage predates the history of New Mexico, or the United States.
He posted a lengthy article on his website tracing the history of marriage, from Aristotle and Confucius to Alexander the Great and the Navajos.
“As marriage goes, so go the children, so goes the nation, so goes the world,” he wrote.
The National Organization for Marriage is asking citizens to “contact Gov. Martinez to thank her for her strong support of marriage” and "urge her to intervene in order to restore the rule of law and the rightful definition of marriage in New Mexico.”
Phone: (505) 476-2200
Online contact form: http://www.governor.state.nm.us/contact_the_governor.aspx
‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’
AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life.
“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September.
“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote.
Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds.
The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again.
After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test.
“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.
The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five.
“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”
“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.
Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.”
“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”
“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.”
“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.”
“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born.
The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well.
View CommentsClick to view or comment.
Share this article
UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react
GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads.
The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution.
“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters.
UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.
“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.
But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it.
The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”
Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.
“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said.
While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms.
“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added.
Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born.
“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.
“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.
View CommentsClick to view or comment.
Share this article
Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’
DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.
“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.
"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.
That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.
“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."
Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.
All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.
Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.
On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”
Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.
At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.
But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.