News

WASHINGTON, April 15, 2005 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Democrats in the Senate have proposed a new bill that would force pharmacies to dispense abortifacient birth-control or morning-after pills, notwithstanding an individual pharmacist’s moral opposition to the drug.

Sponsor New Jersey Democrat Frank Lautenberg, claimed, “If a pharmacist is allowed to pick and choose which prescriptions to fill, everyone’s health could be at risk,” according to a Reuters news report.

Pharmacists would not be allowed to flat-out refuse a patient – they would be required to send the customer to another pharmacist or pharmacy if they themselves were unwilling, because of moral or religious objections, to fill the prescription.

Cristina Alarcon, a Vancouver pharmacist and member of Canada’s Pharmacists for Life, told The Interim’s Paul Tuns in 2001 that forcing pharmacists to refer patients is wrong. She said referring a client to another pharmacist in order to help kill a baby “turns the referring pharmacist into an accomplice.”

Stressing conscience rights, Alarcon added, “Regardless of where you stand on the moral issues surrounding abortion, pharmacists who do not wish to participate must have their ‘freedom of choice’ respected and they must not be forced to refer. … I didn’t spend years studying pharmacy just to become a dispensing machine.”

See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

Ontario Gov’t Funds Over the Counter Morning After Pill Pilot Project

BC Premier Demands Pharmacists Dispense ‘Emergency Contraception’

BC Pharmacy Officials Threatening Pro-Life Pharmacist

See The Interim coverage: Chemical Warfare against the Unborn

tv

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.