Abortion on demand up to 12 weeks, ‘extend abortion into Northern Ireland’: ‘pro-life’ MP Dorries
LONDON, November 6, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The UK’s abortion law needs to be “reformed” by lowering the gestational age limit to 20 from 24 weeks, by extending abortion into Northern Ireland and creating abortion on demand as a right up to 12 weeks, says an MP often characterized as “pro-life” by the media establishment.
Nadine Dorries, a Conservative Party backbench MP who has turned lowering the gestational age limit into her own campaign, secured a debate last week in the House of Commons for 90 minutes in which she laid out her plan to “reform” the 1967 Abortion Act.
Dorries said, “Everyone knows that in this country abortion is obtained on demand by whoever wants it, whenever they want it. I am pro-choice, and I believe that, up until 12 weeks, that should be the case.”
“I am delighted that more than 90% of abortions in this country take place before 12 weeks.”
“As the mother of three young adult daughters, I am a strong believer in a woman’s right to choose. Never, ever would I want to see a return to the bad old days of backstreet abortionists, or restricted access to early abortion.”
John Smeaton, head of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said that Dorries’ comments reveal that she is a “radical” pro-abortion campaigner whose ideas are confused at best. Smeaton commented that the debate “served to show the dangers inherent in the campaign to reduce the upper time for social abortions.”
Lowering the gestational age limit by amending the Abortion Act will do nothing to save unborn children, SPUC maintains, although it may act to salve the guilt of waffling legislators and the undecided public.
Dorries said in the House that her campaign would exclude “babies with foetal abnormalities or, sadly, disabilities.” She commented, “That is a discussion to be held, as I have said, between parents and doctors.”
SPUC has steadfastly opposed gestational legislation, saying that it not only gives away fundamental ground by saying that selected children can be legally killed based on their age, but that it leaves the legal situation vulnerable to opportunistic amendments by pro-abortion MPs.
CLICK ‘LIKE’ IF YOU ARE PRO-LIFE!
A similar outcome was seen in 1990 when Lord David Alton brought forward a bill to lower the age limit from the previous 28 weeks to 24. Abortion campaigners in Parliament used the opportunity to sweep away legal protections for unborn children suspected of having disabilities, who can now be legally killed up to the time of full gestation. Dorries’ proposal to revisit the issue will, SPUC said, reinforce the “current discrimination against disabled babies, allowing them to be aborted up to birth.”
Dorries’ proposal to extend abortion into Northern Ireland, a goal that has long been dear Parliament’s core of hardened abortion lobbyists like Dianne Abbott, has shocked pro-life advocates in the province. Dorries heartily approved the establishment of the illegal Marie Stopes abortion facility in Belfast, which has created an uproar in recent days.
“I believe the law on abortion should be equal in all parts of the Union,” Dorries told the House of Commons. “There needs to be parity across the board.”
She was particularly pleased that it was Marie Stopes moving into Northern Ireland: “If any abortion provider is to come to Northern Ireland, Marie Stopes is probably the best bet.”
Dorries’ claim that Marie Stopes “has no political ideology and is concerned only for the health of the woman,” and that “it operates in a professional manner,” was received with incredulity by Bernadette Smyth, head of Northern Ireland’s leading pro-life lobby group. Smyth told LifeSiteNews.com called Dorries’ proposal “very dangerous” and said she is “not a pro-life MP” who “needs to butt out of Northern Ireland.”
Smyth confirmed to LSN that the Attorney General for Northern Ireland and the Justice Committee are investigating Marie Stopes for illegal activities. She observed that Marie Stopes is one of the largest and most effective abortion lobbying groups in the world, whose favorite method is to “break the law to change the law.”
In July this year, the abortion giant had their activities permanently “suspended” in Zambia for aborting children illegally there. In that country, Marie Stopes made precisely the same claim as in Northern Ireland, that it would act “within the legal framework.” But Northern Province Permanent Secretary, Emmanuel Mwamba, said the group had conducted hundreds of early term “medical” or chemical abortions in contravention of the law, “based on social reasons, social conditions or performed abortions on the mere basis that the pregnancy was unwanted.”
Smyth said that the response of the public to the Belfast Marie Stopes facility has been strongly negative. “People of Northern Ireland,” she said, “are rising even stronger than before. Outrage is rising all over.” She observed that thus far, no customers have had the proffered early chemical abortions at the Belfast facility, saying that it is clear the purpose of the facility is purely political, “to make it look as though there is a demand”.
“It is probably the only abortion facility in the world that doesn’t do abortions, because no one here wants them.”
With few exceptions, pro-life people in Britain have “uniformly” rejected the call for lowered age limits, Smyth said. Instead there is “universal agreement that abortion must be abolished outright.” To change the law to include a lower age limit, she said, would make abortion a right to be regulated. “As it is, abortion is still covered under the criminal code, which is where it belongs.”
Smyth said that Precious Life has written to MPs asking that Dorries “never be given a platform again” in Parliament for her plans.
Smyth said she believes Marie Stopes is working closely with other abortion advocate groups, including the Irish Family Planning Association, who has launched another court case, set to be heard on January 22nd, the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, alleging that Northern Ireland has failed to issue clear “termination of pregnancy guidelines”.
Speaking against Dorries was Jim Shannon, a DUP MP from Northern Ireland, who said, “I believe in human rights. I believe in the most basic of human rights, the right to life, so I am against abortion. I believe that the strong have a duty to protect the weak and the vulnerable.”
Shannon pointed to statistics showing that Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, with their very restrictive laws on abortion, have some of the lowest rates of maternal death and mortality in the world. “The UK mainland, with its more liberal abortion law, has a higher rate of maternal deaths. That speaks volumes, and it is clear that restricted abortion to save the mother’s life, which we have in Northern Ireland, works well to save both mother and child.”
“If there was the option of bringing in Northern Ireland’s abortion laws, I would be pleading with everyone in this House to do just that,” he added. “Although I cannot today change the law in England and Wales, I speak for those babies who feel the pain of being ripped from their mother’s womb. This must stop today.”
Smyth said her sources in the House of Commons say that it is unlikely that Dorries’ proposal will succeed. “She’s exhausted all the avenues they said and there is no will in Parliament for that motion to be put forward,” she said.
View CommentsClick to view or comment.
Share this article
Pro-life group asks: Pray for abortionists who sell baby body parts
February 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - This Lent, a pro-life group would like you to pray for an abortionist - specifically, an abortionist who facilitates the sale of unborn babies' body parts.
The Pro-Life Action League is asking for people to pray for three people in particular throughout the 40 days of Lent. All three were caught on video by the Center for Medical Progress.
Dr. Deborah Nucatola appeared in the first video released last July, sipping red wine and stabbing her salad as she discussed the dismemberment of aborted children, including where to “crush” their bodies for a "less crunchy" technique.
The second is Dr. Mary Gatter, who appeared in the second undercover video, haggling over the prices Planned Parenthood expected to receive for the aborted children's organs and tissue. At one point, she joked that she wants the revenue to pay for “a Lamborghini.”
And the third is Planned Parenthood CEO Cecile Richards, who was also caught in the first video praising Dr. Nucatola.
Despite the shocking evidence uncovered by CMP, Richards has insisted her organization did not receive any profit for what she dubs its "fetal tissue donation program." She apologized only for Dr. Nucatola's "tone." She has since said that Planned Parenthood will not receive any remuneration for babies' body parts.
"These three architects of Planned Parenthood’s baby parts scheme have devoted their lives to the destruction and exploitation of human life in the name of ‘choice,’" said Eric Scheidler, executive director of the Pro-Life Action League. "If we won’t pray for them, who will?”
He asked Christians to pray for these three abortion industry profiteers - and for Richards, who is a post-abortive woman - in order to fulfill Jesus Christ's commandment in the Bible, “Love your enemies, and pray for those who persecute you” (St. Matthew 5:44).
“In God’s eyes, what abortion has done to these three women may be worse than what they’ve done to unborn children, who now rest in our Lord’s loving arms," Scheidler said.
For most Catholics, Lent began yesterday on Ash Wednesday, and lasts 40 days.
Texas AG faces ethics probe for defending conscience rights of natural marriage supporters
AUSTIN, Texas, February 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) – The attorney general of the state of Texas is facing an ethics investigation for having affirmed the constitutional religious freedom of state workers to decline to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples if it goes against their religious beliefs.
Attorney General Ken Paxton took steps to address the issue of conscience protection in his state before and after last June's Supreme Court's Obergefell decision imposing same-sex "marriage" on all 50 states, first issuing a statement the day prior clarifying that Texas law recognizes the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman and recommending that state officials wait for direction from his office should the High Court move to redefine marriage.
Paxton then issued a statement two days after the ruling, his office allowing county clerks and their employees to retain religious freedoms that may allow accommodation of their religious objections to issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples, and said as well that justices of the peace and judges would similarly retain religious freedoms.
Click "like" if you want to defend true marriage.
A month later, a group of some 200 attorneys filed a complaint asserting that Paxton's position encouraged officials to violate the U.S. Constitution and break their oaths of office, according to ABC News.
The complaint was dismissed at first by the Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas, but it was reinstated February 2 by a state Supreme Court-appointed appeals board, which contended that the complaint alleges a "possible violation" of professional conduct rules.
The appeals board decision to reinstate the case does not mean Paxton violated professional ethics, according to the ABC report, but does require him to respond to the complaint in conjunction with the investigation.
"The complaint has always lacked merit," said Paxton spokeswoman Cynthia Meyer, "and we are confident the legal process for resolving these complaints will bear that out."
Paxton was among several state officials across the U.S. who moved to ensure conscience protection in the immediate aftermath the Obergefell ruling, at times garnering the ire of homosexual activists.
Last July, South Dakota's attorney general granted permission to county clerks with conscientious objections to opt out of issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples as long as another clerk in the office would issue the license.
In a highly contentious case, Davis had asked for a religious accommodation allowing her office to issue altered licenses to homosexuals without her name on them, which was eventually granted by Kentucky's Governor Matt Bevin. However, the ACLU sued, seeking to force Davis to issue the old forms with her full name on them. A federal judge rejected the suit earlier this week.
Last year, homosexual activists sent harassing messages, including threats of violence, to Oklahoma State Senator Joseph Silk and his family after the Republican legislator sponsored a bill that would have given the state's business owners the freedom to follow their religious convictions in regard to homosexual "marriage."
Paxton faces penalties varying between a reprimand and disbarment resulting from the ethics complaint. The Texas attorney general is also facing securities fraud charges.
This pro-abortion billionaire may run for president
NEW YORK, February 11, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - He's an upwardly mobile, socially liberal billionaire whose political affiliation has changed numerous times over the years. He's teased numerous presidential campaigns in the past, but this time he's talking like he's serious. And no, he's not who you think he is.
Michael Bloomberg, who served three terms as mayor of New York City, has confirmed to media sources that he is considering running for president as an independent in 2016.
Bloomberg told told the Financial Times this week that he finds American political "discourse and discussion distressingly banal and an outrage and an insult to the voters," and that he's “looking at all the options."
The 73-year-old tycoon was a registered Democrat before switching parties to run in the less contested Republican primary in 2001. He became a registered independent in 2007.
As mayor, Bloomberg governed as a social liberal who strongly supported abortion and the LGBT political agenda.
In 2011, Bloomberg signed a controversial gag order directed at crisis pregnancy centers. A year later, he endorsed Barack Obama's re-election, saying that abortion-on-demand is part of "the world I want to leave my two daughters, and the values that are required to guide us there."
That's the same year Bloomberg Philanthropies announced a $50 million undertaking to expand "reproductive health," including a major partnership with Planned Parenthood-Global to overturn pro-life laws in four nations: Nicaragua, Sengal, Uganda, and Burkina Faso.
Mayor Bloomberg played a pivotal role redefining marriage in New York state, giving the four Republican state senators who voted for New York’s same-sex “marriage” bill the maximum campaign contribution allowed by law. One retired and a second lost his primary fight.
His strong emphasis on health regulations, such as attempting to ban soft drinks larger than 16 ounces, did little to enhance his popularity and were deftly parodied by Sarah Palin. (A state court struck down the proposed regulation.)
The financial heft he could bring into the race, as well as his quirky politics, has tempted Bloomberg to enter presidential politics in the past. He considered a presidential run in 2008 and thought more strongly about a third party bid in 2012, after hosting the inaugural convention of the “No Labels” movement in New York City in 2010, but he backed off each time after not seeing a viable path to victory.
With an estimated fortune of $39 billion, he has said he would be willing to spend more than $1 billion on his campaign in 2016 - but he would only enter the race if the Republican Party nominates Donald Trump or Ted Cruz, and the Democratic Party nominates Bernie Sanders.
He called Jeb and Hillary Clinton "two quality” candidates and "the only two who know how to make the trains run." Jeb reciprocated last month, telling CNN that Bloomberg is "a good person, and he’s a patriot and wants the best for the country.”
At least one of his competitors is eager to see Mike run. "I hope he gets into the race," Donald Trump told Greta Van Susteren on Fox News Wednesday night. "I'd love to compete against him...I would love to see Michael in the race."
That is likely because polling shows Bloomberg would draw most of his support from the Democratic candidate. "Although he is characterized as the New York counterpunch to Trump, Mayor Mike Bloomberg is more the nemesis of Bernie than he is of Donald," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
Bernie Sanders would defeat both Trump and Cruz in a head-to-head match, according to Quinnipiac. But if Bloomberg entered the race, he would win 15 percent of the vote largely from Sanders, giving Trump a one-point victory in the popular vote (and narrowing Cruz's loss to one point).
However, he could throw a major wrench in the Democrats' electoral college total, according to columnist Pat Buchanan.
"Not only would Bloomberg lose the Big Apple, his statewide vote would come mostly from the Democratic nominee, giving Republicans the best opportunity to carry the Empire State since Ronald Reagan coasted to re-election in 1984," wrote Buchanan, who served as White House communications director during Reagan's second term.
“It’s not beyond imagining that he could get in and have an effect on the race,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-RI, told The Hill.
Perhaps sensing this, numerous Democrats - including Senators Claire McCaskill and Jeanne Shaheen - have thrown cold water on a Bloomberg presidential run.
Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Florida congresswoman, said this week that an independent Bloomberg candidacy "won't be necessary" - because the Democrats already represent social liberals.
"I really think when he takes a good hard look, he will conclude that the issues that are important to him...[have] a natural home among our Democratic candidates," she said. "And so, I think Michael Bloomberg's agenda is well cared-for and advanced among our Democratic candidates, and his candidacy, I think he will find, won't be necessary.""
His entrance into the race would be a true injection of "New York values" - making him the third or fourth New Yorker in the race - alongside fellow billionaire Trump from Queens, the Brooklyn-born Sanders, and onetime New York Senator Hillary Clinton.
Annie Linskey, a reporter for the Boston Globe who once worked for Bloomberg, told Fox News on Monday that there is "about a four" percent chance that Bloomberg will run.