Hilary White

Abortion on demand up to 12 weeks, ‘extend abortion into Northern Ireland’: ‘pro-life’ MP Dorries

Hilary White
Hilary White

LONDON, November 6, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The UK’s abortion law needs to be “reformed” by lowering the gestational age limit to 20 from 24 weeks, by extending abortion into Northern Ireland and creating abortion on demand as a right up to 12 weeks, says an MP often characterized as “pro-life” by the media establishment.

Nadine Dorries, a Conservative Party backbench MP who has turned lowering the gestational age limit into her own campaign, secured a debate last week in the House of Commons for 90 minutes in which she laid out her plan to “reform” the 1967 Abortion Act.

Dorries said, “Everyone knows that in this country abortion is obtained on demand by whoever wants it, whenever they want it. I am pro-choice, and I believe that, up until 12 weeks, that should be the case.”

“I am delighted that more than 90% of abortions in this country take place before 12 weeks.”

“As the mother of three young adult daughters, I am a strong believer in a woman’s right to choose. Never, ever would I want to see a return to the bad old days of backstreet abortionists, or restricted access to early abortion.”

John Smeaton, head of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children, said that Dorries’ comments reveal that she is a “radical” pro-abortion campaigner whose ideas are confused at best. Smeaton commented that the debate “served to show the dangers inherent in the campaign to reduce the upper time for social abortions.”

Lowering the gestational age limit by amending the Abortion Act will do nothing to save unborn children, SPUC maintains, although it may act to salve the guilt of waffling legislators and the undecided public.

Dorries said in the House that her campaign would exclude “babies with foetal abnormalities or, sadly, disabilities.” She commented, “That is a discussion to be held, as I have said, between parents and doctors.”

SPUC has steadfastly opposed gestational legislation, saying that it not only gives away fundamental ground by saying that selected children can be legally killed based on their age, but that it leaves the legal situation vulnerable to opportunistic amendments by pro-abortion MPs.


A similar outcome was seen in 1990 when Lord David Alton brought forward a bill to lower the age limit from the previous 28 weeks to 24. Abortion campaigners in Parliament used the opportunity to sweep away legal protections for unborn children suspected of having disabilities, who can now be legally killed up to the time of full gestation. Dorries’ proposal to revisit the issue will, SPUC said, reinforce the “current discrimination against disabled babies, allowing them to be aborted up to birth.”

Dorries’ proposal to extend abortion into Northern Ireland, a goal that has long been dear Parliament’s core of hardened abortion lobbyists like Dianne Abbott, has shocked pro-life advocates in the province. Dorries heartily approved the establishment of the illegal Marie Stopes abortion facility in Belfast, which has created an uproar in recent days.

“I believe the law on abortion should be equal in all parts of the Union,” Dorries told the House of Commons. “There needs to be parity across the board.”

She was particularly pleased that it was Marie Stopes moving into Northern Ireland: “If any abortion provider is to come to Northern Ireland, Marie Stopes is probably the best bet.”

Dorries’ claim that Marie Stopes “has no political ideology and is concerned only for the health of the woman,” and that “it operates in a professional manner,” was received with incredulity by Bernadette Smyth, head of Northern Ireland’s leading pro-life lobby group. Smyth told LifeSiteNews.com called Dorries’ proposal “very dangerous” and said she is “not a pro-life MP” who “needs to butt out of Northern Ireland.”

Smyth confirmed to LSN that the Attorney General for Northern Ireland and the Justice Committee are investigating Marie Stopes for illegal activities. She observed that Marie Stopes is one of the largest and most effective abortion lobbying groups in the world, whose favorite method is to “break the law to change the law.”

In July this year, the abortion giant had their activities permanently “suspended” in Zambia for aborting children illegally there. In that country, Marie Stopes made precisely the same claim as in Northern Ireland, that it would act “within the legal framework.” But Northern Province Permanent Secretary, Emmanuel Mwamba, said the group had conducted hundreds of early term “medical” or chemical abortions in contravention of the law, “based on social reasons, social conditions or performed abortions on the mere basis that the pregnancy was unwanted.”

Smyth said that the response of the public to the Belfast Marie Stopes facility has been strongly negative. “People of Northern Ireland,” she said, “are rising even stronger than before. Outrage is rising all over.” She observed that thus far, no customers have had the proffered early chemical abortions at the Belfast facility, saying that it is clear the purpose of the facility is purely political, “to make it look as though there is a demand”.

“It is probably the only abortion facility in the world that doesn’t do abortions, because no one here wants them.”

With few exceptions, pro-life people in Britain have “uniformly” rejected the call for lowered age limits, Smyth said. Instead there is “universal agreement that abortion must be abolished outright.” To change the law to include a lower age limit, she said, would make abortion a right to be regulated. “As it is, abortion is still covered under the criminal code, which is where it belongs.”

Smyth said that Precious Life has written to MPs asking that Dorries “never be given a platform again” in Parliament for her plans.

Smyth said she believes Marie Stopes is working closely with other abortion advocate groups, including the Irish Family Planning Association, who has launched another court case, set to be heard on January 22nd, the anniversary of Roe v. Wade, alleging that Northern Ireland has failed to issue clear “termination of pregnancy guidelines”.

Speaking against Dorries was Jim Shannon, a DUP MP from Northern Ireland, who said, “I believe in human rights. I believe in the most basic of human rights, the right to life, so I am against abortion. I believe that the strong have a duty to protect the weak and the vulnerable.”

Shannon pointed to statistics showing that Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic, with their very restrictive laws on abortion, have some of the lowest rates of maternal death and mortality in the world.  “The UK mainland, with its more liberal abortion law, has a higher rate of maternal deaths. That speaks volumes, and it is clear that restricted abortion to save the mother’s life, which we have in Northern Ireland, works well to save both mother and child.”

“If there was the option of bringing in Northern Ireland’s abortion laws, I would be pleading with everyone in this House to do just that,” he added. “Although I cannot today change the law in England and Wales, I speak for those babies who feel the pain of being ripped from their mother’s womb. This must stop today.”

Smyth said her sources in the House of Commons say that it is unlikely that Dorries’ proposal will succeed. “She’s exhausted all the avenues they said and there is no will in Parliament for that motion to be put forward,” she said.

Share this article

Featured Image
Fr. Mark Hodges

, , , ,

VIDEO: Expert says China will continue forced abortions, sterilizations

Fr. Mark Hodges
By Fr. Mark Hodges

IRONDALE, Alabama, November 25, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – An expert on China says the country's move from the infamous "one-child per family" policy of forced abortion and sterilization to a "two-child" policy will leave the status quo largely intact.

Human rights activist Reggie Littlejohn, an expert on China and the president of Women's Rights Without Frontiers, spoke with Raymond Arroyo of Eternal Word Television Network's The World Over show about China's new policy of allowing families two children.

Littlejohn said that the change from a one-child to a two-child policy is motivated not by human rights, but by demographics. "It is not that the Chinese communist party has suddenly grown a conscience...at all. It is that they are facing a threefold demographic disaster."

First of all, Ms. Littlejohn said, China "doesn't have enough women, because of their gendercide."

"The core of the policy is not that they allow one child or two children, but is that they are setting a limit, and enforcing it through forced sterilization, forced contraception, and a whole web of surveillance of women, monitoring women's menstrual cycles and their fertility," Littlejohn explained. "All of that coercion will remain the same under a two-child policy."

"A two-child policy carries all of the [same] terrible and appalling methods of abortion as the one child policy," Ms. Littlejohn explained. "It's just that they start killing after two, instead of after one."

Littlejohn went on to say that China's demographic problems resulting from 40 years of gendercide will not be fixed by the new two-child allowance. "Even if China were to completely abolish their policy right now, and allow to everybody to have as many kids as they want to have, it's going to take twenty years for the women to grow to the point where they can marry, and everybody to the point where they can be workers," she said.

She said that the Chinese have "dug themselves in a hole that they can't get out of."  Arroyo pointed out that there are 33 million more men than women in China today.

Littlejohn does not expect gendercide to decrease immediately. "What I think is going to happen," Littlejohn said, "is couples who have a boy are going to stop at one," because of the high expense of having children in China. "And those who have a girl first are going to continue to abort a second daughter, because they still want to have a son."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

When Arroyo pointed out that government statistics say 350 billion dollars since 1980 were levied in fines against those who tried to defy China's one-child policy, Littlejohn responded, "That's why I don't think China will ever abandon its policy: it's a huge money-maker for them." She noted that local officials determine the amount of fines and line their pockets with the cash.

She pointed out that five years ago, the Chinese government admitted that over four hundred million babies in the womb have been killed – and that number is far greater today.

Littlejohn pointed out that any Chinese citizen who dares to tell the truth about the communist policy is persecuted. "People who get their stories to the West – not only do they have to endure the trauma of the forced abortion itself, but they have to endure trauma [against] themselves and their families from the Chinese Communist Party for seeing them before the world."

"Thank God for Ted Cruz, also for Marco Rubio, and for Congressman Chris Smith – all three of those have come out with very, very powerful statements saying basically that the two-child policy does not fix any of the problems with the one-child policy," Littlejohn said. "I'm so glad that they ... are getting the truth out there."

Republican presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz spoke against China's policy earlier this month. "In America, we should stand with victims of oppression," he said. "These are horrific acts of brutality. They are inhumane. They are contrary not only to American values, but to human rights across the globe, and they are carried out as a matter of policy."

Rep. Chris Smith and Sen. Marco Rubio have also issued statements cautioning that China's move to a two-child policy will not end brutal, coercive population control.  

Rep. Smith, chairman of the House subcommittee that oversees human rights and chairman of the Congressional-Executive China Commission, held a hearing entitled "China's One-Child Policy: The Government's Massive Crime Against Women and Unborn Babies." Smith explained, "The policy has directly contributed to what is accurately described as gendercide – the deliberate extermination of a girl, born or unborn, simply because she happens to be female."

In October, Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio criticized China's two-child policy. "The policy is still repressive," Rubio explained. "The fact remains that when couples conceive a third child, the Chinese government will force them to eliminate him or her, by any means necessary."

Rubio concluded, "A two-child policy is as indefensible and inhumane as a one-child policy, and it would be a mistake to assume this change in any way reflects a newfound respect for human rights by Beijing. The U.S. must continue advocating for the complete elimination of government-forced population planning."

Featured Image
Steve Weatherbe

, ,

Irish children’s minister joins call for nation to abandon pro-life constitution

Steve Weatherbe
By Steve Weatherbe

DUBLIN, November 25, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – Ireland's health minister has joined the chorus of feminist groups calling for a referendum to repeal the country's 30-year-old Eighth Amendment, a part of the Constitution, which allows abortion only when the mother's life is directly threatened.

Children's Minister Dr. James Reilly told the Sunday Independent that despite the reluctance of the major parties (including his own Fine Gael) to support a referendum, the public wants it. "We have had more than 30 years on this and we really need political leadership on this issue. I think it is quite clear from opinion polls that the vast majority of people are way ahead of politicians on this."

Reilly said women carrying unborn babies with fatal abnormalities should be allowed to have abortions, regardless of whether delivery poses a risk to their lives or health.

But Cora Sherlock, the head of the Prolife Campaign, told LifeSiteNews, "It is not something the people really want; it is not coming from the grassroots, but from a few pressure groups like Amnesty International. The people of Ireland have always had a heart for the unborn."

Pro-abortion activist Sinead Kennedy of the Repeal the Eighth Coalition said every politician should declare his or her position. "We would like to see political parties in the run up to the election [expected in spring] come out and declare that this will be [a] red-line issue for any participation in government."

In fact, in September, Ireland's Taoiseach, or prime minister, Enda Kenny, said his government, if re-elected, will hold a referendum on the Eighth Amendment only if a workable alternative is advanced at the same time.

Sherlock noted that despite an "aggressive campaign" from Amnesty Ireland and its uncritical promotion by the news media, popular support for the referendum is waning. A poll published by the Sunday Independent on Nov. 22 showed 56% in favor of the referendum, down 10% from June, with 22% opposed.

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Support for abortion in specific cases is also down: in cases of fatal abnormalities in the unborn baby, support for abortion is down 9% to 55%; when the mother threatens suicide, it is down 4% to 68%; and when there is a long-term threat to the mother's health, support is down 5% to 64%.

"I think it is going down because people are becoming aware of the Planned Parenthood stories from the U.S., and of Kermit Gosnell," Sherlock said, in reference to the videos showing America's leading abortion provider trafficking in body parts from aborted babies, and to the abortionist convicted of multiple murders of babies who survived his botched abortions only to be executed by him and his staff afterwards. "The news media don't like to cover those stories, but the social media has a mind of its own," she added.

Last year, several government ministers declared that the people of Ireland had "no appetite" or "little appetite" for a referendum; however, they might vote if it were held anyway. They promised there would be no referendum before the 2016 election and even warned against making it an election issue, which was the case in 1983 with the referendum that put Amendment Eight in the Constitution in the first place.

The Eighth Amendment declares the unborn child's life as equal to, and equally worthy of protection as, the life of the mother. The vagueness of this formula led the current government to pass a law two years ago allowing abortion when the mother's life is at risk, including at risk by suicide, right up to the day of a child's birth.

Popular opinion still opposed abortion as late as 2007, but by 2012, support for abortion had risen to 85%. Lately, Amnesty International has lent its reputation to the push for a referendum, leading Sherlock to predict, "Amnesty will be the loser when the hypocrisy of a so-called human rights group attacking the unborn becomes evident and when people see that they are only willing to talk about teenage pregnancy, but not about the unborn, not about the Planned Parenthood videos nor Kermit Gosnell, and about how these go hand in hand with abortion on request."

Featured Image
Gina Raimondo, Democrat candidate for governor of Rhode Island http://www.ginaraimondo.com/
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

, ,

Abortion supporters slam new budget by Rhode Island’s Democrat governor

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins

PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island, November 25, 2015 (LifeSiteNews) – Abortion advocates aren't happy with a budget bill signed by Rhode Island's Democratic governor, because it gave 9,000 people insurance coverage that doesn't cover elective abortions.

Earlier this year, an anonymous HIV-positive practicing Catholic won a lawsuit against the state, gaining the right for citizens under the state's Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchange to have an insurance plan that doesn't cover elective abortions. Shortly after John Doe's victory, pro-abortion governor Gina Raimondo signed a budget bill that included a pro-life rider making the legal victory statutory law.

The law caused 9,000 out of approximately 30,000 people who were automatically enrolled in health insurance programs for 2016 to have insurance coverage without elective abortion coverage. State officials are now scrambling to notify insurees that they can change their coverage by December 23.

Abortion groups aren't happy, with one blogger writing that Raimondo's signature means that "those who supported Gina Raimondo's bid for Governor of Rhode Island may want to seriously reconsider their support."

The governor won support from at least two national abortion groups in her race last year.

A spokesperson for Raimondo's office e-mailed that "the Governor's first priority is ensuring that all Rhode Islanders have the opportunity to access affordable health insurance that meets their needs, including access to safe and affordable reproductive healthcare."

"Changes in state policy require insurance carriers participating in HealthSource RI to offer one plan at every 'metal level' that does not include most abortion coverage," Maria Tocco told LifeSiteNews. "This year, HSRI launched an automatic renewal process to ensure that Rhode Islanders who signed up for coverage would maintain it without any gap in service."

Tocco e-mailed that "HSRI proactively reached out to all its customers by mail before the start of the open enrollment period to let customers know precisely which plans include abortion coverage and which do not."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

In a phone call, Tocco clarified that Health Source Rhode Island had gotten involved in contacting enrollees – a process normally left up to insurers – because state policy had caused the change in coverage. Tocco clarified that this would be the case if coverage for other medical services and products were changed by state policy.

Barth Bracy, the executive director of Rhode Island Right to Life, said arguments by abortion advocates that they want to expand choice to those who may not be aware of the loss of abortion insurance coverage are false. "Note that each enrollee in an abortion plan (regardless of age, sex, or family status) pays a surcharge into the abortion-slush fund created by Obamacare," he said. "The fewer people who enroll in an abortion-covering plan, the higher the charge must be on those who do choose those plans, increasing the differential between the abortion and non-abortion plans, thus making the abortion plans less attractive."

"This is all about padding the Obamacare abortion slush fund," he concluded, saying that "the only 'error' by the government (both federal and state) was the error of King Herod, who did not succeed in his designs to get every single child. And that was due to the work of RI Right to Life and ADF, which together threw a monkey wrench into the monstrous machine created by Obamacare."

Doe told LifeSiteNews that he is "pleased and grateful that, because of the efforts of the Rhode Island State Right to Life Committee, the Alliance Defending Freedom lawsuit, and subsequent state legislation, Rhode Islanders who oppose abortion can now participate in the state's health insurance exchange without being forced to fund abortions."

Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Casey Mattox said that "Rhode Islanders now have the choice of plans that cover and those that don't cover elective abortions." Mattox criticized abortion advocates for "demand[ing] that everyone, including a pro-life man like our client, be compelled to pay a special abortion fee to subsidize the abortion industry. Federal and state law requires Rhode Island to offer this choice to their citizens, and we are pleased with this outcome."

Tocco told LifeSiteNews that the bill and the John Doe lawsuit were unrelated. However, Mattox, who represented Doe in court, noted that the bill's signature "took place after our client won his lawsuit."

"It doesn't matter to us how the governor wants to frame this," Mattox told LifeSiteNews. "We are just glad for the people of Rhode Island that the right thing was done."

Bracy clarified that the rider was his group's way of making sure the legal decision was formally in state law.


Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook