News

Monday May 24, 2010


ACLU Attacks Texas Sheriff for Refusing to Drive Inmate for Abortion

By James Tillman

WEATHERFORD, Texas, May 24, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) — The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has threatened legal action against a Texas sheriff, claiming he violated an inmate’s constitutional “right” to an abortion by refusing to transport her to an abortion clinic.

Sheriff Larry Fowler, however, said he would not use taxpayer funds to facilitate the deed.

“My personal feeling is I don’t feel like the taxpayers of Parker County would think much of their sheriff spending taxpayer money to take people to abortion clinics,” Fowler told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

“I don’t think they would want me to even entertain that notion.”

Lisa Graybill of the ACLU Foundation of Texas said that court precedent has established the “constitutional right of incarcerated pregnant women to access abortion care,” in a letter to Parker County Attorney John Forrest. She also said that the woman’s family had arranged the appointment and was going to pay for the abortion.

Sheriff Fowler said, however, that the woman could have simply posted bond and gone to the abortion mill by herself. The county attorney John Forrest also stated that Fowler was following the law.

The ACLU is not going to sue, as the woman was recently released on probation and obtained an abortion without government assistance; however, Graybill threatened legal action should a similar incident occur.

“The purpose of our letter [to John Forrest] is to put Parker County on notice that any future restrictions on women’s reproductive health care will be challenged in court,”said Graybill in a statement.

In October, an Arizona judge sided with the ACLU to forbid Maricopa County sheriff Joe Arpaio from charging female inmates transportation costs for obtaining abortions – even though the sheriff charged transportation for other medical procedures – due to a constitutional “right” to abortion. Arpaio’s office at the time said he planned to appeal the ruling.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...