Featured Image

IOWA (LifeSiteNews) – Agricultural interests have come out against plans to build a 2,000-mile “carbon capture” pipeline across Midwestern states, including Nebraska and Iowa.

Summit Carbon Solutions wants to build a pipeline through Midwestern states that will capture carbon and store it underground in the name of stopping man-made climate change. The Midwest Carbon Express project would move “climate-warming greenhouse gases from Midwest biofuels plants to North Dakota for permanent storage underground,” according to Reuters.

But farmers, ranchers, and other agricultural interests have raised concerns about the effects of the pipeline on their livelihood.

The company also wants to be able to enter onto the private farmland to survey it.

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
9735 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 10000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!


'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' -

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' -

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! -

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson /

  Hide Petition Text

“This is a private company seeking something that isn’t in the best interest of the public,” cattle farmer and Nebraska resident Bev Kutz told Reuters.

“It would go more than half a mile through prime farmland,” Dan Tronchetti, an Iowa corn and soybean farmer, told Reuters. Summit is interested in his property for its carbon pipeline path.

There is also a fear that the company could use eminent domain to force landowners to sell or offer access to their properties.

“If the Board were to grant Summit Carbon the power of eminent domain, county compensation commissions would determine the ‘just compensation’ to which the individual landowners would be entitled,” Iowa State University’s agricultural law center said. “Landowners and Summit Carbon would have the right to appeal these initial determinations through the Iowa court system.”

The Midwest Carbon Express “would have the capacity to capture and permanently store 12 million metric tons of carbon dioxide every year,” according to Iowa State University’s Center for Agricultural Law and Taxation.

“The proposed pipeline would also cross through four other states – North Dakota, Nebraska, Minnesota, and South Dakota – and would capture and transport the emissions from more than 30 ethanol plants for long-term underground sequestration. Summit Carbon projects a 2024 completion date,” the center said on an information page about the project.

Tronchetti and fellow landowners want to be able to communicate with other opponents, but the Iowa Utilities Board sided with Summit to block the release of the names of “thousands of individual landowners in the path of Summit Carbon Solutions’ proposed carbon sequestration pipeline,” according to the Des Moines Register.

“It is obvious the only reason Summit wants to keep the names secret is to prevent, or at least make it more difficult for, landowners to communicate with each other, to organize a response to Summit, and to protect their property rights,” the Sierra Club wrote in opposition. The environmental group is concerned about the pipeline’s possibility to be used for further oil exploration.

Other companies are looking at the Midwest for similar projects. “Texas-based Navigator CO2 Ventures proposes building a 900-mile pipeline across 36 Iowa counties, a project that would cost at least $2 billion,” the Des Moines Register reported.

The pipelines could help alleviate rising oil and gas prices, however.

The Sierra Club said that the carbon pipelines could “allow for the extension of fossil fuel extraction through enhanced oil recovery,” referring to the use of carbon to retrieve oil from a harder-to-reach reservoir.

The environmental group said carbon capture and sequestration is “a false solution that takes us farther away from our climate goals.”

“These pipelines continue business as usual, will only be feasible with massive public subsidies, and should not be approved,” the Sierra Club said.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.