Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

Another abortion committed in hospital co-administered by Catholic diocese

Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
Matthew Cullinan Hoffman
Image

October 3, 2012 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Contrary to repeated denials by the Archdiocese of Barcelona that abortions are continuing to be performed in a hospital it helps to administer, a Spanish health journal is reporting a recent eugenic abortion performed at the hospital on a 24-week old unborn child, who was killed because of a deformity.

In addition to the death of the child, his twin suffered ill health effects and premature birth that were directly attributed to the abortion, while the mother is reported to have been psychologically devastated by guilt, to the point she has been unable to bond with her surviving son. In the medical journal article, a hospital official who oversaw the case says the woman’s feelings are “irrational” and “inappropriate.”

The account of the abortion is found in the September issue of Spanish healthcare magazine “Rol,” and addresses the case of Juan, the surviving twin. At 24 weeks gestation, the age generally agreed by doctors to be the point of viability outside the womb, doctors at Barcelona’s Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Holy Cross and St. Paul) Hospital performed what the magazine clinically calls a “reduction,” killing Juan’s brother because of an unnamed defect in his development.

According to María Serret Serret, a professor of Nursing Sciences who teaches nursing students at the hospital, she noticed that Juan’s mother was exhibiting “a great number of negative thoughts” in the aftermath of the abortion and premature birth, which “interfered notably in the process of bonding with her (surviving) son.”  The “negative thoughts” included “sadness, fear, anxiety, anguish, guilt, and a feeling of inability of caring for her baby.”

Click ‘like’ if you want to END ABORTION!

Serret worked with Juan’s mother to overcome what appears to have been post-abortion syndrome by “analyzing the inappropriate feelings.”

“Each one of the negative thoughts is evaluated with the mother, and it is shown that they have been produced in an irrational way, that errors have been committed in their production,” such as “all or nothing thoughts, overgeneralizations, mental filters, jumping to conclusions, emotional reasoning, universal labeling, with personalization and guilt.”

This is followed by “modification of thinking,” in which “more realistic and useful alternatives are sought based on the evidence, the existing possibilities, the consequences of said thoughts, and the errors of reasoning that are being committed,” according to Serret’s detached analysis.

The article provides more evidence that abortions are continuing to be performed at the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, as well as other Barcelona-area hospitals which are linked to the Catholic Church and whose boards of directors are partially comprised of Catholic priests. One Barcelona priest, Fr. Custodio Ballester, as well as other pro-life activists, have been organizing monthly protests (http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/after-more-than-a-year-protests-continue-asking-catholic-barcelona-hospital/) in front of the hospital.

As LifeSiteNews.com also reported in December of last year, the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital’s chief gynecologist functions as the medical expert for a pharmaceutical company website designed to induce women to use contraceptives, including abortifacient hormonal contraceptives.

The Catholic news agency ACI Prensa additionally reported in May of this year that a young woman, whose name was withheld, says she was recently offered an abortion twice at the same hospital.

Although the bishop of the nearby diocese of Terrassa has denounced abortions carried out in hospitals there, he says that he has been advised by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that he may continue to seek to persuade the hospitals not to engage in abortions, using the leverage of Catholic board members. However, the Cardinal Archbishop of Barcelona continues to stonewall those who observe that the Santa Creu i Sant Pau Hospital and other Barcelona hospitals appear to be continuing to kill the unborn.

Related links:

Petition requesting that hospital cease to do abortions circulated by the Saint Andrew’s Cross Association of Spain.

To sign:

Nombre: First name, Primer apellido: Last name, Secundo apellido: leave blank, Correo electronico: your email address, Provincia: leave blank, Commentario personal: your personal comments

The Spanish text of the petition is as follows:

To His Excellency the Minister of Heath of the Government of Catlonia

CC: His Eminence Luis Martinez Sistach, Archbishop of Barcelona

I wish to express to you my most energetic protest for the fact that, as is made clear in Rol magazine, in a hospital that was founded on the principles of charity and Catholic morality, as is the case of the Saint Paul and Holy Cross hospital of Barcelona, abortions are being carried out.  And this is happening despite the “Christian democratic” roots of [the political coalition] Convergence and Union [currently governing Catalonia] and despite the public petitions realized by the Catalonian bishops and also by the Archbishop of Barcelona (to which we are attaching a copy of this letter), so that unborn children are no longer murdered in any hospital and especially in those in which the Catholic Church participates, which to be consistent with their ideals, should always respect every human life, avoiding all of the policies of DEATH defended by the parties of the System: euthanasia, experimentation on embryos, abortion…

We do not find any motive for which the Government of Catalonia cannot exempt the hospitals in which the Church participates from abortionist practices, keeping in mind the closeness and affection (which we can see is clearly unmerited) that the Church leadership in Catalonia has shown and shows to the various administrations of Catalonia.

On the other hand, we ask that you take into account and that in the future you recognize and offer the care necessary to mothers who, after having had an abortion, suffer Post Abortion Syndrome.

If these things are not done we will continue to think that there exists a unacceptable political ambition of converting the clerics in the hospitals into accomplices of the current political system and therefore, of the “abominable crime of abortion” (Vatican II, Gaudium et Spes, 51).

FREE pro-life news.

Stay up-to-date on the issues you care about the most. Subscribe today. 

Select Your Edition:


Advertisement
Featured Image
Shutterstock.com
Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin

Two Congressmen confirm: National 20-week ban on abortion will come up for a vote shortly

Dustin Siggins Dustin Siggins Follow Dustin
By Dustin Siggins

WASHINGTON, D.C., April 17, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A bill to end abortion in the United States after 20 weeks will move forward, and it will have the strong support of two leading pro-life Congressmen, the two Republicans told LifeSiteNews.com at the eighth annual Susan B. Anthony List Campaign for Life Summit on Thursday.

Rep. Chris Smith, R-NJ, told LifeSiteNews and the National Catholic Register that ongoing House discussions on H.R. 36, the "Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act," will result in a pro-life bill moving forward.

"Very good language" is being put together, Smith told The Register. He told LifeSiteNews that he fully anticipated being able to support the final bill, because the House Republican caucus "wouldn't have something that would be unsupportable. Our leadership is genuinely pro-life."

In 2013, the "Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act" easily passed through the House of Representatives, only to be stalled by a Democratic-controlled Senate. This year, an identical bill was halted by Rep. Renee Ellmers, R-NC, and other Republicans -- surprising and angering pro-life leaders who thought its passage was assured. That bill, H.R. 36, is now being rewritten so it can be voted on by the full House, though its final wording remains uncertain.

Some fear that the House leadership will modify the bill to mollify Ellmers. She and others objected that the bill allows women to abort a child after 20 weeks in the case of rape – but only if they report that rape to the authorities.

Pro-life activists say removing the reporting requirement would take abortionists at their word that the women whose children they abort claimed to be raped. Congresswoman Ellmers has publicly stated the House leadership is considering such a proposal.

Jill Stanek, who was recently arrested on Capitol Hill as part of a protest to encourage Republicans to pass H.R. 36, said that would be "a loophole big enough for a Mack truck."

Click "like" if you are PRO-LIFE!

Congressman Smith said the bill will come to the floor shortly. "The commitment to this bill is ironclad; we just have to work out some details," Smith said.

He also noted that, while a vote on the 20-week ban has been delayed for nearly three months, "we did get the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act passed, and that would have been in the queue now, so we just reversed" the order of the two bills.

Congressman Smith spoke to both outlets shortly after participating in a panel at the Summit.

Another speaker was Rep. Steve King, R-IA, who also supports the 20-week ban.

"I can't think of what” language that is actively under consideration could make him rethink his support for the bill, King said. He also told attendees that the nation was moving in a direction of supporting life.

The outspoken Congressman declined to answer further, noting "that's asking me to anticipate an unknown hypothetical."

The annual Campaign for Life Summit and its related gala drew other high-profile speakers, including presidential candidate Senator Rand Paul, potential presidential hopeful Senator Lindsay Graham, and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus.  

Advertisement
Featured Image
"Someone who doesn’t flinch at the dismemberment of babies is not going to flinch at the dismemberment of some evangelical baker’s conscience."
Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon

Pro-lifers are winning. So now they’re coming for our cupcakes?

Jonathon van Maren Jonathon van Maren Follow Jonathon
By Jonathon van Maren

As I travel across Canada (and at times the United States) speaking on abortion and various facets of the Culture of Death, one of the things I hear often is a hopelessness, a despair that the West is being flattened by the juggernaut of the Sexual Revolution. There is a feeling among many people that the restriction of religious liberty, the continued legality of abortion, and the redefinition of marriage are inevitable.

This is, of course, one of the most prominent and successful strategies of the Sexual Revolutionaries—create an aura of inevitability while concurrently demonizing all those who oppose their new and mangled “progress” as Neanderthals on the cusp of being left behind by History. That inevitability becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy, because many people don’t realize that the various battles in the Sexual Revolution actually all correlate to one another—that what we are seeing now is the end game of an incredibly vast and well-planned cultural project.

It is because we miss many of these connections that we often cannot see, with clarity, how the culture wars are actually unfolding. I read with great interest a recent column by Rev. Douglas Wilson, eloquently titled “With stirrups raised to Molech.”

“We are now much occupied with the issues swirling around same sex mirage,” he writes, “but we need to take great care not to get distracted. Why have the homosexual activists gone all in on this issue? Why is their prosecutorial zeal so adamant? We went, in just a matter of months, from ‘let’s let individual states’ decide on this, to federal judges striking down state statutes, followed up hard by official harassment of florists, bakers, and photographers. Why the anger, and why the savage over-reach? And do they really think we couldn’t remember all the things they were assuring us of this time last year?”

Follow Jonathon van Maren on Facebook

It’s a compelling question, and one that I’ve heard many Christians puzzling over recently. Why do the advocates of the Sexual Revolution despise those who disagree with them so viciously? It is partly because their cultural project does not, as they claim, consist of “living and let live.” It is about compulsory acceptance of any and all sexual behaviors, with tax-payer funding for the rubbers and pills they need to ensure all such behaviors remain sterile, and extermination crews to suction, poison, and dismember any inconvenient fetuses that may come into being as the result of casual coitus.

The ancient mantra “the State has no business in the bedrooms of the nation” has long been abandoned—the emboldened Sexual Revolutionaries now demand that politicians show up at their exhibitionist parades of public indecency, force schools to impose their so-called “morally neutral” view of sexuality on children, and force into silence those who still hold to traditional values.

Rev. Wilson, however, thinks that this loud and vicious war on conscience may be about even more than that. The pro-life cause, he notes, has been very successful in the Unites States. The abortion rate is the lowest it has been since 1973. Hundreds of pro-life laws are passing on the state level. The abortion industry has been successfully stigmatized. True, the successes are, for pro-lifers, often too feeble and not nearly adequate enough in the face of such unrestrained bloodshed. Nevertheless, the momentum has turned against the Sexual Revolutionaries who have championed abortion for decades—their shock and anger at the strength of the pro-life movement evident in pro-abortion signs at rallies that read, “I can’t believe I still have to protest this s**t.”

It is because of the pro-life movement’s success, Wilson muses, that the Sexual Revolutionaries may be coming at us with such fury. “If a nation has slaughtered 50 million infants,” he writes, “they are not going to suddenly get a sense of decency over you and your cupcakes. Now this explains their lack of proportion, and their refusal to acknowledge the rights of florists. Someone who doesn’t flinch at the dismemberment of babies is not going to flinch at the dismemberment of some evangelical baker’s conscience. This reveals their distorted priorities, of course, but it also might be revealing a strategy. Is the homosexual lobby doing this because they are freaking out over their losses on the pro-life front? And are they doing so in a way intended to distract us away from an issue where we are slowly, gradually, inexorably, winning?”

It’s a fascinating perspective. It’s true—and has always been true historically—that when one group of human beings is classified as nonhuman by a society as nonhuman and subsequently butchered, the whole of society is degraded. No nation and no culture can collectively and systematically kill so many human beings without a correlating hardening of the conscience. But on the pro-life front, there has been decades of fierce resistance, hundreds of incremental victories, and a renewed energy among the upcoming generation of activists. For the Sexual Revolutionaries who thought the battle was over when Roe v. Wade was announced in 1973, this must be a bitter pill to swallow indeed.

Follow Jonathon van Maren on Facebook

Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Lisa Bourne

, ,

‘Prominent’ Catholics attacking Archbishop Cordileone are big donors to Pelosi and pro-abort Democrats

Lisa Bourne
By Lisa Bourne

Note: To sign a petition supporting Archbishop Cordileone, click here

SAN FRANCISCO, CA, April 17, 2015 (LifeSiteNews.com) -- Big donors to the Democrat Party and pro-abortion Nancy Pelosi are among those publicly harassing San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone for protecting Catholic identity in the area’s Catholic high schools.

A big-ticket full-page ad ran April 16 in the San Francisco Chronicle attacking the archbishop and calling Pope Francis to oust him for his efforts to reinforce Catholic principles in the schools.

A number of prominent San Francisco-area residents identifying as Catholic are signatories of the ad, and several are wealthy donors to Democrat entities and pro-abortion politicians, Catholic Vote reports.

Federal Election Commission records indicate Charles Geschke, Adobe Systems chairman and previous head of the Board of Trustees at the University of San Francisco, gave more than $240,000 to Democrat groups, as well as $2,300 to Nancy Pelosi and $4,000 to John Kerry, both politicians who claim to be Catholic but support abortion and homosexual “marriage.”

Also on the list is political consultant and businessman Clint Reilly, who gave nearly $60,000 to Democrat organizations, along with $5,000 to Barack Obama, whose administration vehemently promotes abortion and homosexual “marriage” and has continually opposed religious liberty. Reilly gave $4,600 to Pelosi as well.

Another individual in the ad attacking the archbishop who also gave big campaign donations to California pro-abort Democrats was Lou Giraudo, a former city commissioner and business executive who contributed more than $24,000 to Nancy Pelosi, $6,000 to Dianne Feinstein and $4,300 to Barbara Boxer.

Nancy Pelosi herself challenged the archbishop for his stance on Catholic teaching last year when she tried to pressure him out of speaking at the March for Marriage in Washington D.C., claiming the event was “venom masquerading as virtue.”

The archbishop responded in a letter that he was obliged “as a bishop, to proclaim the truth—the whole truth—about the human person and God’s will for our flourishing ... especially the truth about marriage as the conjugal union of husband and wife.”

The April 16 ad attacking Archbishop Cordileone was the latest in an ongoing assault since the archbishop took steps in February to strengthen Catholic identity in the schools and clarify for faculty and staff in handbooks and contract language the long-standing expectation that they uphold Church principles. 

It said Archbishop Cordileone has “fostered an atmosphere of division and intolerance” and called on Pope Francis to remove him.

“Holy Father, Please Provide Us With a Leader True to Our Values and Your Namesake,” the ad said. “Please Replace Archbishop Cordileone.”

The Confraternity of Catholic Clergy (CCC), a national association for priests and deacons, condemned Archbishop Cordileone’s harassers in a statement, saying the archbishop “teaches in conformity to the Catechism of the Catholic Church.”

“The character assassination and uncharitable venom being cast upon a bishop merely defending the doctrines of his religion is appalling and repugnant,” the CCC said. 

Click "like" to support Catholics Restoring the Culture!

“It is totally inappropriate, improper and unjust for the media and others to vilify and brutally attack him when he is doing precisely what an ordained minister and pastor of souls is obligated to do,” the group stated, “namely, speak the truth in season and out of season.”

Those behind the attack ad said the proposed handbook language was mean-spirited, and that they were “committed Catholics inspired by Vatican II,” who “believe in the traditions of conscience, respect and inclusion upon which our Catholic faith was founded.”

The Archdiocese of San Francisco denounced the ad upon its release, saying it was a misrepresentation of Catholic teaching and the nature of the teacher contract, and a misrepresentation of the spirit of the Archbishop.

“The greatest misrepresentation of all is that the signers presume to speak for “the Catholic Community of San Francisco,” the archdiocese responded. “They do not.”

The CCC pointed out that just as physicians are expected to be faithful to the Hippocratic Oath, bishops, priests, and deacons are expected to be faithful to the Church, its teachings and its authority, “since their objective is the salvation of souls, not a popularity contest.” 

In openly declaring their support for Archbishop Cordileone, the group urged the media and others to show “prudence, civility, and fair-mindedness” toward those with whom they disagree.

“He took an oath to be faithful to the Gospel,” the Confraternity stated of Archbishop Cordileone, “and in the words of the disciples in the New Testament, ‘better to obey God than men.’”

Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook