Featured Image
Statue of Christopher Columbus in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.Nikolay Antonov /

Help protect pregnant mothers from vaccine mandate by donating to the Dominican Republic LifeFunder campaign.

SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic  (LifeSiteNews) —  A second appeal against the harsh vaccine mandate now in place in the Dominican Republic (D.R) will be presented before the country’s Supreme Court today, and lawyers are determined to keep appealing until they win. 

The President of Santo Domingo’s Civil and Commercial Chamber, part of the Dominican Supreme Court, rejected yesterday’s appeal against the new extreme vaccine mandate in place in the D.R. The appeal was rejected because of an error in documentation and procedure. Appropriate corrections have since then been made, and a new hearing is expected to take place today. 

According to the mandate, which went into effect yesterday, anyone aged 12 or over must show proof of vaccination in order to use public transportation, go to work, or buy food. Meanwhile, many people throughout the world are reluctant to take the currently available COVID-19 vaccines because of the thousands of deaths and millions of other serious injuries that have been reported after their use. Others do not want to take the vaccines because cell lines derived from aborted babies were used in their production or testing. 

“There was a defect of form which prevented the hearing from going forward,” explained Yancalos Martínez, one of the lawyers in charge of the case, regarding the first appeal.   

Martínez told journalists gathered outside the chamber that he and his team were working to fix the issue which prevented the case to be received by the Supreme Court yesterday. 

“What we are going to do now, is we’re going to make the necessary corrections in order to reintroduce the case,” he said, “but in the meantime, the hearing that was supposed to take place today was not permitted to go ahead due to this procedural error.” 

The lawyer explained that these types of errors are very common and insisted that this setback should in no way be interpreted as the court’s final decision on the issue.  

“These types of errors occur on a daily basis, both at the Constitutional Tribunal and at the Supreme Court,” he said.  

“Error is human.” 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge "Catholic" Terry McAuliffe to renounce his promotion of abortion
  Show Petition Text
1730 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 2500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Democratic candidate Terry McAuliffe is standing for governor of Virginia and, like Joe Biden, he likes to say he is a "very strong Catholic."

Yet, also like Biden, he strongly supports killing unborn babies and is a longtime defender of the abortion industry. As if to underscore that fact, McAuliffe has even ghoulishly campaigned at an abortion center in his latest run for office.

Please SIGN and SHARE this petition which tells Terry McAuliffe to reject killing the innocent, stop supporting the abortion industry, and return to the Catholic Faith! This petition will also be CC'ed to the Virginia Catholic Bishops' Conference.

In spite of the fact that McAuliffe was born and raised in a Catholic family and graduated from a Catholic high school and university, he has supported the murder of the unborn throughout his life in elected office.

Indeed, McAuliffe has been taken to task several times by different dioceses. Going back to 2004, McAuliffe was disinvited as a guest speaker at his high school alma mater in Syracuse, New York, because of comments he made during a radio interview, saying that abortion is a matter of choice.

Fast-forward to 2017, when then-Governor McAuliffe (of Virginia) was excoriated by the Virginia Bishops' Conference for vetoing a bill to defund Planned Parenthood.

At the time, the Bishops' Conference stated that McAuliffe's "actions harm the dignity of women deceived by the multibillion-dollar abortion industry as well as the tiniest females, those still in the womb whose lives are brutally eliminated by abortion."

Nevertheless, McAuliffe apparently still sees nothing wrong with his support of killing unborn babies, and, as above, he recently toured an abortion mill for a morbidly opportunistic campaign photo-op. (See tweet below.)

Grateful for the opportunity to tour the Whole Woman’s Health facility in Charlottesville this afternoon with @SallyLHudson. I'll always fight to protect women's clinics as gov. No Youngkin Texas-style abortion ban in VA!

— Terry McAuliffe (@TerryMcAuliffe) September 9, 2021

Stepping foot inside a place where babies are actually killed, and then campaigning to keep such murderous facilities open, takes support for abortion to a heinous new low.

And, supporting abortion as a public official is even worse for McAuliffe in terms of his relationship with God and the Catholic Church.

While supporting abortion is always wrong, Catholic politicians who vocally support abortion have an even greater responsibility to renounce their wayward positions precisely because of the scandal it can cause to the Catholic faithful, very possibly leading many others astray.

Relying on the Catechism lessons he received throughout his high school and university education, Terry McAuliffe should now reconsider his position on the killing of unborn children, and take this opportunity to publicly repent of his support for abortion, the killing of the innocent.

If McAuliffe does not take steps to publicly repent of his adamant support of abortion, the bishops of Virginia should take this opportunity to address and clarify his relationship with the Eucharist and the Church.

Terry McAulliffe and all Virginians deserve to know about his standing in the Catholic Church, especially if his relationship with the Church is something he likes to speak about publicly.

Thank you for SIGNING this important petition, which will be CC'ed to the Viriginia Bishops' Conference, and which implores Virginia gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe to reject his support for abortion and the abortion industry.

After you have signed, please consider SHARING this vital petition with your like-minded friends, family, neighbors and colleagues.

Thank you!


  Hide Petition Text

Martínez remains hopeful that he and his team will win this battle and said that a new hearing is expected to take place today, October 19.  

“Tomorrow there will be a new hearing where the decision regarding the appeal itself will be made,” he said.  

The Dominican lawyer told journalists that he is determined to fight until the appeal goes through.  

“What’s important isn’t that the appeal didn’t go through,” he said. “What’s important is that we will keep filing this case going forward until we win.” 

Dominican newspaper Diario Libre reported that the President of the Dominican Republic, Luis Abenader, as well as the Public Health Minister, Daniel Rivera, have been summoned to these hearings, for the appeal claims that the vaccine mandate is in violation of a number of articles contained in the Dominican constitution, including article 38 on human dignity, article 39 on equality, article 40 on the right to personal freedom and security, article 42 on the right to personal integrity, article 62 on the right to work, and article 74, which lays outs the application and interpretation of fundamental rights and guarantees of citizens. 

The case presented to the Dominican Supreme Court yesterday states that the appeal was launched “because of a threat to the fundamental rights of the whole community,resulting in the restriction of basic constitutional rights for millions of citizens with unsuspected consequences including the break-down of peace and public order, as well as the irruption of chaos, violence and disorder on roads, public transport and recreational spaces.” 

Help protect pregnant mothers from vaccine mandate by donating to the Dominican Republic LifeFunder campaign.


Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.