News

BUENOS AIRES, February 13, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A federal judge ordered the Argentine Ministry of Health to halt its implementation of a World Bank-pushed “sexual health” program which included abortifacient pills.  Zenit News reports that Justice Judge Cristina Garzón de Lascano of Cordoba ordered the Ministry of Health and Social Action on Tuesday “to abstain from executing the National Program of Sexual Health and Responsible Procreation,” especially some of its most controversial parts.

Pro-lifers argued that the new program offended the right to life with abortifacients, offended the right to health of women with indiscriminate distribution of harmful anti-conception and offended the right of parents to control the sexual education of their children.  LifeSite reported that last March, the Supreme Court of Argentina ruled that the “morning after pill” known as “Imediat”, produced by the Argentinean laboratory Gador, may not be manufactured, distributed or sold in Argentina because the pill acts as an abortifacient and therefore violates the Constitutional protection of human life “from the moment of conception”.

See the full account from Zenit at:  https://zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=31311   See related LifeSite coverage:  ARGENTINE SUPREME COURT PROHIBITS “MORNING-AFTER PILL”  https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2002/mar/02030601.html VATICAN WARNS ARGENTINA AGAINST CANADIAN PRO-ABORTION GROUP https://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2002/oct/02100902.html

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.