News
Featured Image
U.S. Supreme CourtShutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) — The attorney who will argue against the “constitutional right” to abortion in the monumental Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health case in the U.S. Supreme Court next month had previously clerked for staunchly pro-life Justice Clarence Thomas and served in the Trump administration’s Justice Department.

The U.S. Supreme Court had announced in May it would hear the case, which concerns Mississippi’s HB 1510 law banning abortions later than 15 weeks gestation for any reason other than physical medical emergencies or severe fetal abnormalities.

Scott Grant Stewart was appointed Mississippi’s solicitor general in March and will lead the pro-life fight in Dobbs v. Jackson when oral arguments begin December 1.

The Supreme Court is expected to address the legality of the current precedent for legalized abortion when it hears the Dobbs case. A deluge of amicus briefs have called upon the Court to immediately overturn both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the two landmark cases which established and affirmed the “constitutional right” to pre-viability abortion throughout all 50 U.S. states.

Pro-life and pro-abortion advocates alike have recognized Dobbs v. Jackson as having the potential to overturn existing abortion precedent, allowing states to impose broad restrictions or even fully outlaw abortion.

As the attorney representing Mississippi, Stewart will champion his state’s contention that the prior Supreme Court decisions establishing a “right” to abortion were “egregiously wrong” with “no basis in text, structure, history, or tradition.”

“It’s the most aggressive position he could have taken in defending Mississippi’s law, which bans nearly all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy,” the Washington Post contended in a November 9 article highlighting Stewart’s career and involvement in the Dobbs case.

Josh Blackman, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston and a conservative legal commentator, told the Post that Dobbs “is going to be a very significant case, not just for [Stewart’s] career but for the conservative legal movement.”

“There’s an entire movement that’s behind him and supporting him,” Blackman said.

Prior to his current appointment as Solicitor General of Mississippi, Stewart served as a law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas from 2015 to 2016, moving on to work in the Trump administration’s Justice Department as counsel to the assistant attorney general and later deputy assistant attorney general.

A graduate of Princeton University and Stanford Law School, Stewart wrote a paper during his senior year at Princeton arguing that U.S. presidents should spend more time talking about the issue of abortion. The Post suggested Stewart “seemed to prefer reasoned, dispassionate debate, whether about abortion or the death penalty or anything else.”

According to the Post, “The paper concluded with his ‘hope for change’ on national polarization.”

During his tenure in the Trump administration Stewart represented the federal government in a case against a 17-year-old illegal immigrant who sought to obtain an abortion in Texas.

While a district court ultimately ordered that the girl be permitted to obtain an abortion in the U.S., Stewart defended the Trump administration’s policy of refusing to “facilitate” abortions for unaccompanied minors who had crossed the southern border illegally and been taken into federal custody.

It’s unclear how closely Stewart’s personal opinions about abortion align with those of staunchly pro-life Justice Clarence Thomas, for whom he clerked from July 2015 to July 2016. Relatively unknown in pro-life circles to date, the Mississippi solicitor general has not publicly discussed his personal views about abortion.

In 2020, Thomas argued that Roe v. Wade “created the right to abortion out of whole cloth, without a shred of support from the Constitution’s text.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Ban Critical Race Theory in public schools
  Show Petition Text
6926 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 7500!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The dangerous ideas of Critical Race Theory (CRT) are being forced on students in public schools around the country.

This is wrong and parents have had enough! It's time to join them in saying "STOP!" to this harmful and racist propaganda.

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition which says "No to CRT" in public schools, and "Yes to parents' right" to strongly protest CRT.

But, what is CRT anyway and why is it so dangerous?

Critical Race Theory is a hateful system of indoctrination which teaches that one race is either superior or inferior to another race, and that the United States is inherently racist.

CRT is dangerous and hateful precisely because it teaches children who are not white to despise and envy white children simply because of their skin color. And, as a result, it also teaches white children to despise themselves simply because of the color of their skin.

CRT also erroneously teaches that American society is inherently racist, and that different, detrimental policies (like reparations for slavery and race-based pay scales) should be imposed on the population to redistribute wealth from whites to non-whites.

This type of racist/marxist propaganda should have NO place in public, taxpayer-funded schools!

And, thankfully, American parents of EVERY COLOR are raising their voices and ballots against it!

Indeed, parents understand the destructive ramifications of CRT and, despite outrageous threats from Biden's Justice Department to prosecute them, they have been strongly protesting CRT at school board meetings across the country!

And now, in the first test of its kind, a candidate who was campaigning hard against CRT just won the governorship of Virginia in a huge upset victory.

That's great news, but we now need to contact every state legislature about this crucial educational issue.

And, we need to DEMAND that they BAN Critical Race Theory from every public school in their states - both primary and high schools, and colleges!

Whereas advocates of CRT seem more intent on vengence than on teaching children of every race to respect everybody, regardless of skin color, American parents of every race understand that it is not the color of one's skin that matters, but the content of one's character (to paraphrase Martin Luther King, Jr.).

Please SIGN and SHARE this urgent petition asking all state legislatures to BAN Crititical Race Theory from public schools in their respective states.

Thank you!

FOR MORE INFORMATION:

'States are fighting the Left over the morally bankrupt critical race theory' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/states-are-fighting-the-left-over-the-morally-bankrupt-critical-race-theory/

'Parents who oppose Critical Race Theory in schools could be prosecuted by FBI' - https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/attorney-general-tasks-fbi-to-move-against-parents-protesting-leftist-agenda-in-schools/

Ohio parents testify: Yes, critical race theory is in our schools, and we say NO! - https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/ohio-parents-testify-yes-critical-race-theory-is-in-our-schools-and-we-say-no

An excellent Heritage Foundation document on CRT: Critical Race Theory Would Not Solve Racial Inequality: It Would Deepen It

**Photo Credit: EJ Nickerson / Shutterstock.com

  Hide Petition Text

“Our abortion precedents are grievously wrong and should be overruled,” Thomas wrote in a fiery dissent to a decision blocking a Louisiana law requiring basic medical precautions in the event of abortion complications.

“The idea that the Framers of the Fourteenth Amendment understood the Due Process Clause to protect a right to abortion is farcical,” Thomas said.

The state of Mississippi, represented by Stewart in Dobbs, appears to agree with Justice Thomas’ assessment of the standing legal precedent for abortion.

In July, months after Stewart’s appointment as solicitor general, the state of Mississippi filed a brief severely condemning the prior rulings establishing a “right” to abortion, explicitly asking the Court to overrule both Roe and Casey.

In the brief — in which Stewart is named as the counsel of record — Mississippi argued that “Roe and Casey have inflicted significant damage,” and that “[t]he stare decisis case for overruling Roe and Casey is overwhelming.”

Stewart will defend Mississippi’s stance requesting that the Supreme Court overturn the prior decisions in both Roe and Casey when oral arguments begin in the Dobbs v. Jackson case on December 1.

A decision in the Dobbs case is expected next summer.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.