News

By Peter J. Smith

CANBERRA, Australia, April 6, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – More than thirty experts on children have made an open call for a ban on selling soft pornography by commercial venders such as newsstands, supermarkets, and convenience stores, saying its easy accessibility is contributing to the sexualization of children, reports the Sydney Morning Herald.

Thirty-four academics, child professionals and advocates sent a letter to the current committee of attorneys-general/censorship ministers, arguing that the sale of soft pornography should be banned from areas where children can be exposed to it.

The group also asked the ministers and attorneys general to review how so-called men’s magazines, or “lads’ mags,” are evaluated, saying they are getting even more sexually explicit and helping to sexualize children.

Julie Gale, director of the lobby group Kids Free 2B Kids, said that even though children have access to pornography over the Internet, the presence of pornography in publicly-accessible places “gives it public validation.”

SMH reported that Catherine Manning of Say No 4 Kids sent a petition with 8,000 signatures to the attorneys general, also calling for tighter restrictions on the distribution of pornography and citing her concern with the effect of pornography on the psychological development of children.

''Exposure to adult sexualised material can send the wrong message to children about what's expected of them as adults. Girls think they should behave like 'porn stars' and boys expect them to,'' Manning said.

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.