News
Featured Image
 Shutterstock

(LifeSiteNews) – Recent autopsy data supports an association between COVID mRNA “vaccines” and heart inflammation, rather than a link between the COVID virus itself and such adverse effects.

On Sunday, The Daily Sceptic highlighted a growing body of autopsy studies that “repeatedly affirm” that the COVID-19 mRNA shot caused myocarditis, or heart inflammation, which in turn led to death in the cases studied.

One study, shared August 1, concluded that two teenage boys died “shortly” after their Pfizer mRNA jab due to “myocardial injury,” echoing two other reports which identified myocarditis as the cause of death following COVID “vaccination.” 

A review of data from Europe and the U.S. found that 0.22 percent of 13,571 reports of COVID jab-associated heart inflammation were fatal, the Sceptic noted. 

This finding is even more significant when the extraordinarily high frequency of reported myopericarditis (refers to inflammation of the heart muscle itself, and/or its suspending sack) following COVID “vaccination” in youth is accounted for.

For example, a recent study found that about one in three Thai adolescents who received Pfizer’s mRNA shot — 29.24 percent, to be precise — suffered heart pathologies following “vaccination.”

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Stop Tedros' WHO Pandemic Treaty
  Show Petition Text
100894 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 125000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

The WHO Pandemic Treaty looks set to be one of the biggest power-grabs in living memory, with unelected globalists seeking the power to declare pandemics, and then control your country's response. 

But it's not too late to do something about it. 

SIGN and SHARE this special petition telling Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus that the WHO will never usurp your nation's sovereignty.

The past two years have been rife with infringements on personal liberties and civil rights by national governments, but now the World Health Organization is seeking to appropriate those same abusive powers to itself at a global level. 

194 member states representing 99% of the world's population are expected to sign pandemic treaties with the WHO that would allow Tedros, or any future Director General, to dictate exactly how your nation would respond to a new disease outbreak which they consider a pandemic.

This attack on national sovereignty will come as no surprise to those who for years have listened to elites like Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates discussing their vision for the centralization of power into globalist organizations like the World Economic Forum (WEF), the WHO and the rest of the United Nations. 

SIGN this petition against the WHO's Pandemic Treaty, before it's too late.

Ludicrously, 20 world leaders calling for the treaty, including Tedros, Boris Johnson and Emmanuel Macron, compared the post-Covid world to the post-WWII period, saying similar co-operation is now needed to "dispel the temptations of isolationism and nationalism, and to address the challenges that could only be achieved together in the spirit of solidarity and co-operation - namely peace, prosperity, health and security."

Australian PM Scott Morrison is the latest leader to express support for a “pandemic treaty”.

The stated intention of the WHO is to “kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.”

The wheels are already in motion, with the Biden administration officially proposing the initial steps towards handing global pandemic control to the WHO. 

Biden's representatives have submitted amendments to the WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR), which would give the Director General the right to declare health emergencies in any nation, even when disputed by the country in question.

These amendments, which would be legally binding under international law, will be voted on by the World Health Assembly (the governing body of the WHO) at a special convention running from May 22-28 and set the stage for a fully-fledged pandemic treaty to be passed. 

SIGN and SHARE the petition telling the WHO that you won't accept any pandemic treaty

The ball has been rolling since the last World Health Assembly meeting in December, where the United States launched negotiations "on a new international health instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response," a U.S. statement read. 

"This momentous step represents our collective responsibility to work together to advance health security and to make the global health system stronger and more responsive. 

"We look forward to broad and deep negotiations using a whole-of-society and whole-of-government approach that will strengthen the international legal framework for public health/pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response and enable us to address issues of equity, accountability, and multisectoral collaboration evident in the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"We know it will take all of us working together across governments, private sector, philanthropy, academia, and civil society to make rapid progress towards a long-term solution for these complex problems," the U.S. statement added.

SIGN the petition today to show the WHO that you won't accept this attack on national sovereignty.

These are precarious times in which freedom and self-determination must be defended from those who would ride rough-shod over your civil rights. 

We do not want to go back to global lockdowns, vaccine mandates and propoganda.

Sign the petition - speak up now!

For More Information:

Biden hands over American sovereignty with proposed WHO treaty - LifeSiteNews

Pandemic Treaty is a backdoor to global governance - LifeSiteNews

Dr. Robert Malone on the WHO's power-grab - LifeSiteNews

**Photo: YouTube Screenshot**

  Hide Petition Text

READ: Study finds heart inflammation risk 133x greater for teenage boys after Pfizer’s COVID shot

In February, health researcher and former Trump HHS official Dr. Paul Alexander cited hundreds of studies demonstrating harm caused by the COVID jab, about 200 of which found an apparent association between the COVID jab and myocarditis.

The incidence of heart inflammation following mRNA “vaccination” in young people was high enough that Sweden and Denmark paused the use of Moderna’s COVID shot last year.

According to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), as of August 19, there have been 51,722 reports of myopericarditis with Pfizer’s mRNA jab, accounting for more than three-quarters of the reported incidents.

In 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) added a warning to patient and provider fact sheets for both Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines suggesting an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis — particularly following the second dose and with onset of symptoms within a few days after vaccination.

The FDA’s update followed a June 23 meeting which concluded that the benefits of receiving a COVID vaccine still outweigh any risks. But physicians and other public commenters during the June 23 meeting accused the CDC of exaggerating the risk of COVID to young people and minimizing the risk of the vaccines.

READ: Pediatric cardiologist says vaccine mandates may kill children, lead to ‘sudden cardiac death’

By contrast, evidence for a link between the COVID virus itself and heart inflammation is lacking, according to recent studies, including autopsy studies. Some researchers found, for example, that “no overt pathological findings attributable to SARS-CoV-2 infection could be recognised outside of the lung” and that “[B]eyond the respiratory tract [SARS-CoV-2 infection] does not induce any major pathology… in fatal cases.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

4 Comments

    Loading...