Peter Baklinski

News,

B.C. MLA wants bigger abortion-clinic ‘bubble zones’ in wake of local 40 Days for Life campaign

Peter Baklinski
Image
Image

VIEW ROYAL, British Columbia, October 23, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A local British Columbian pro-life group, turning up the pressure on Vancouver Island’s abortuary during the 40 Days for Life campaign, has caused a Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) to campaign for a bigger “bubble zone” around provincial abortion clinics, from 50 to 60 metres.

Maurine Karagianis, NDP MLA for Esquimalt-Royal Roads, has accused the pro-lifers of “verbal assault” and “emotional assault” on women “seeking services” at the Vancouver Island Women’s Clinic, which is directed by abortionist Dr. Konia Trouton.

“(Clinic staff) are very concerned about the really aggressive nature of the protestors,” she told Victoria News, adding that the “clinic is asking for the bubble zone to be increased so that they can push some of those protestors further back.”

Steve Weatherbe, President of Choose Life Victoria, is calling Karagianis’s claims “just bogus”.

“It’s just Karagianis interpreting our presence as assaultive,” he told LifeSiteNews.com.

Karagianis, who was re-elected in May, is the opposition critic for Women’s Issues and Child Care.

Choose Life Victoria is on day 29 of 40 Days for Life, a campaign to end abortion through prayer and fasting, peaceful vigil at abortion clinics, and community outreach.

Weatherbe said his group is always careful about how it interacts with people.

“We’re very careful — in our signage and what we do when people engage us in conversation — to be very passive, generous, charitable, and mild.”

But Karagianis believes that she has a valid case for a larger bubble zone. According to Victoria News, West Shore RCMP allegedly received a call about a member of the pro-life group entering the abortion clinic on October 10.

Weatherbe confirmed that a new member of the pro-life group did enter the abortuary to ask questions about the kinds of services provided, but that the woman did not violate the bubble zone ordinance since it is not illegal for a woman to seek information about what services a business provides.

“There are certain things you can’t do inside the bubble zone, and one of them isn’t that you can’t go and ask questions of the staff,” he said.

West Shore RCMP told LifeSiteNews that it did not have a record of the incident, and even if it did, it would not allow for its release.

Weatherbe said that Karagianis’ is trying to silence opposition to abortion.

“Her intention — her side will say anything — is to get us out of there because they want to create a moral vacuum around the clinic. They want a place where nobody questions what’s going on,” he said.

“They want [the abortion clinic] to continue going on as it did for tens years before we came on the scene. They want it to continue on as a place where nobody even knows [the clinic] exists so that the people of View Royal can go on complacently passing by everyday a place that kills a thousand babies a year.”

B.C.’s “bubble zone” law was passed in 1995, seven years after the 1988 Morgentaler decision where the Supreme Court decriminalized abortion, stripping away the few remaining legal protections offered to unborn babies. The law forced pro-life demonstrators away from abortion clinics. Violators can be fined up to $5000 and six months in jail, with greater penalties for subsequent offences.

B.C.’s Appeal Court upheld the bubble-zone law in 2008, with Justice Catherine Ryan ruling at that time that the “object of the Act is to protect vulnerable women and those who provide for their care to have safe, unimpeded access to health care services.” A further appeal was dismissed in April.

The Vancouver Island Health Authority has written a letter supporting Karagianis’ efforts to have the bubble zone increased, according to Victoria News. But View Royal City Council, however, has come out in opposition to the MLA’s efforts, since it says it has not received complaints from the clinic or its patients.

“So while it’s an interesting suggestion from our MLA, I think we probably need to hear other input, other concerns, favour for this,” said Counselor John Rogers to Vancouver Times.

Weatherbe said he is pleased that City Council is not supporting Karagianis’ initiative, and that it appears to him that Council “realizes the importance of free speech, fairness, and due process in a pluralistic democracy.”

Weatherbe said that pro-abortion citizens who vulgarly oppose his group’s peaceful and legal pro-life efforts should be the ones receiving the attention for their indecent and offensive behavior.

Weatherbe has witnessed residents living near the abortion clinic hurling abusive language at pro-lifers peacefully and prayerfully witnessing to life.

He related how one woman opened an apartment door nearby and exposed herself nude to the group. Another time this same woman appeared wearing a noose around her neck calling out that the group’s activities would make her commit suicide.

Horse manure and food scraps have been dumped where the pro-lifers witness in an effort to compel them to leave the area. Obscene chalked messages aimed at the pro-lifers have been written in the same area.

Weatherbe is discussing with his group how to best proceed. The current bubble zone law already puts his group across the street from the abortion clinic. If the zone area is increased, the group will be forced to place itself much further down the street, out of view of the clinic.

“We’re against this of course because then we wouldn’t have any impact on people going into the clinic, we wouldn’t be able to give those women a chance to reflect upon and question their own actions before they go in and get this quickie [abortion] operation,” he said.

“The whole thing is about creating a morality free zone.”

Contact info:

Mayor Graham Hill
View Royal Town Hall
45 View Royal Avenue, Victoria BC V9B 1A6
Phone: (250) 479-6800
Email: [email protected]

Maurine Karagianis, Esquimalt-Royal Roads MLA
A5-100 Aldersmith Place, Victoria, BC V9A 7M8
Phone: (250) 479 8326
Email: [email protected]



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
A photo of Kim Tucci at 25 weeks gestation Erin Elizabeth Photography
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

News,

‘Little miracles’: Mom gives birth to naturally-conceived quintuplets after refusing ‘selective reduction’

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete
Image
An ultrasound of the five different compartments, each with its own baby, inside Kim's womb.

AUSTRALIA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- A 26-year-old Australian mom has given birth to five healthy babies, all conceived naturally, after refusing the doctor’s advice that she must abort three of them in order to give the remaining two a better chance at life. 

“After my initial ultrasound I was told I could consider the selection method to give 2 babies the best chance in life,” wrote mom Kim Tucci in a Facebook post last September. 

“I watched a YouTube video on the procedure and I cried. I could never do that! Was I selfish for not giving two the chance of 100% survival? All I knew is that I already love them and that every heart beat I heard I connect with them more. For me life starts when a heart starts beating and all I know for sure is that I will do whatever it takes to bring them into this world healthy,” she wrote. 

Last Thursday Kim and her husband Vaughn welcomed the five new members into their family — one boy and four girls —increasing the number of their children from 3 to 8. The babies were born at 30 weeks, 10 weeks early, due to insufficient space in Kim’s womb. They weighed on average about 2.5 pounds. 

The quintuplets’ story began last March, after Kim and Vaughn had been trying for six months to conceive just one more child for their family. Due to health complications, Kim wondered if she would ever become a mother again. 

After what she thought was an extra long cycle, she decided to take a pregnancy test. 

“I was feeling tired and a little nauseated and thought I would take a pregnancy test just to get the ‘what if’ out of my head. To my shock and utter excitement it was positive,” she wrote on a Facebook post.

The parents got the shock of their lives when doctors confirmed in an ultrasound examination that there was not one baby, but five. 

“After a long wait for the ultrasound we finally went in. The sonographer told me there were multiple gestational sacks, but she could only see a heart beat in two. I was so excited! Twins!”

“I was moved to another machine for a clearer view and had the head doctor come in and double check the findings. She started to count, one, two, three, four, five. Did i hear that correctly? Five? My legs start to shake uncontrollably and all i can do is laugh. The sonographer then told me the term for five is ‘quintuplets,’” Kim wrote.

Even though Kim began to feel stretched to the limit with all those human lives growing inside her, she chose to focus on her babies, and not herself, referring to them as “my five little miracles.” 

“It's getting harder as each day passes to push through the pain, every part of my body aches and sleeping is becoming very painful. No amount of pillows are helping support my back and belly. Sometimes I get so upset that I just want to throw my hands up and give in.”

“Sometimes my pelvis becomes so stiff I can barely walk and my hips feel like they are grinding away constantly. I'm finding it hard to eat as I basically have no room left in my stomach, and the way it is positioned it's pushed all the way back with the babies leaning against it.” 

“My skin on my belly is so stretched its painful and hot to touch. It literally feels like I have hives! No amount of cream helps relieve the discomfort. I have a lot of stretch marks now. Dealing with such a huge change in my body is hard.” 

“Is it all worth it? Yes!!!! I will keep pushing through,” she wrote in one Facebook post days before the babies were born. 

The newborns' names are Keith, Ali, Penelope, Tiffany, and Beatrix. They were born at King Edward Memorial Hospital in Subiaco, Western Australia. Mother and babies are reported to be doing well. 



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
Jordanian Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein, the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights UN Photo/Paulo Filgueiras
Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

News

UN rights chief tells Catholic countries to legalize abortion over Zika virus: bishops and cardinal react

Pete Baklinski Pete Baklinski Follow Pete

GENEVA, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) -- The United Nations, following the lead of international abortion activists, is now urging Latin American countries hit by the mosquito-borne Zika virus to lift restrictions on abortion for pregnant women who have contacted the virus and whose pre-born children may be at risk for birth defects, including having smaller than normal heads. 

The UN human rights office said today that it is not enough for South American countries to urge women to postpone pregnancy without also offering them abortion as a final solution. 

“How can they ask these women not to become pregnant, but not offer… the possibility to stop their pregnancies?” UN spokeswoman Cecile Pouilly told reporters. 

UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein said that governments should make available contraception and abortion services.

“Laws and policies that restrict (women’s) access to these services must be urgently reviewed in line with human rights obligations in order to ensure the right to health for all in practice,” he said.

But Brazil’s bishops strongly asserted yesterday that efforts should be made to eradicate the virus, not the people who may be infected by it. 

The disease is “no justification whatsoever to promote abortion,” they said in a statement, adding that it is not morally acceptable to promote abortion “in the cases of microcephaly, as, unfortunately, some groups are proposing to the Supreme Federal Court, in a total lack of respect for the gift of life.”

Honduras Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga has also come out strongly against the notion of “therapeutic abortions” as a response to the problem. Unlike Brazil where abortion is legal in the case of rape or health of the mother, abortion remains entirely illegal in Honduras.

“We should never talk about ‘therapeutic’ abortion,” the cardinal said in a homily at a February 3 Mass in Suyap. “Therapeutic abortion doesn’t exist. Therapeutic means curing, and abortion cures nothing. It takes innocent lives,” he said. 

While the World Health Organization (WHO) declared an international public health emergency February 1 on account of concerns over the virus, critics have pointed out, however, that not one death as resulted from the virus. Even on WHO’s own website the virus is described in mild terms. 

“It causes mild fever and rash. Other symptoms include muscle pain, joint pain, headache, pain behind the eyes and conjunctivitis. Zika virus disease is usually mild, with symptoms lasting only a few days,” the website states. “To date, there have been no reported deaths associated with Zika virus,” it added. 

Critics suspect that the crisis is being manipulated to advance an anti-human agenda on the pre-born. 

“Is Zika, actually, a hideous virus that threatens to spread uncontrollably across the world creating an army of disabled children with tiny heads and low IQ’s? Or might this be a willful misinterpretation of the scarce data to manipulate public opinion and legislatures?” wrote pro-life critic Mei-Li Garcia earlier this week.

“It becomes very clear that the publicity surrounding this story has a very little to do with medicine and a lot to do with a convenient crisis that is being used by those pushing for the legalization of abortion around the world,” she wrote.



Share this article

Advertisement
Featured Image
JStone / Shutterstock.com
Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

News,

Hillary’s litmus test for Supreme Court picks: They must ‘preserve Roe v. Wade’

Ben Johnson Ben Johnson Follow Ben

DERRY, NH, February 5, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) - Hillary Clinton has a litmus test for Supreme Court nominees - several, in fact. At a Democratic event on Wednesday, Clinton unveiled her criteria in selecting a judge for the nation's highest court.

“I do have a litmus test, I have a bunch of litmus tests," she said.

"We’ve got to make sure to preserve Roe v. Wade, not let it be nibbled away or repealed,” she said.

There have been over 58,000,000 abortions since the 1973 court ruling legalizing abortion in all 50 states, according to National Right to Life.

That echoes her recent call to arms speech before Planned Parenthood last month, when she stated that taxpayers must fund abortion-on-demand in order to uphold the "right" of choice.

“We have to preserve marriage equality,” Clinton said, referring to last summer's Obergefell v. Hodges case, a 5-4 ruling that redefined marriage nationwide. “We have to go further to end discrimination against the LGBT community."

Her views differentiate her from the Republican front runners. Ted Cruz has called the court's marriage ruling "fundamentally illegitimate," and Donald Trump told Fox News Sunday this week that he would "be very strong on putting certain judges on the bench that I think maybe could change things." Marco Rubio has said he won't "concede" the issue to the one-vote majority.

All Republican presidential hopefuls say they are pro-life and will defund Planned Parenthood.

Her husband, Bill Clinton, raised the makeup of the Supreme Court early last month in New Hampshire, saying it receives "almost no attention" as a campaign issue.

On Wednesday, Hillary said "the next president could get as many as three appointments. It’s one of the many reasons why we can’t turn the White House over to the Republicans again.”

Clinton said her judicial appointees must also reverse the Citizens United ruling on campaign finance and oppose a recent decision striking down a portion of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. In 2013's Shelby County v. Holder, justices struck down Section 4(b) of the act, which said that certain states and jurisdictions had to obtain permission from the federal government before changing their voting laws.

At one time, most politicians frowned upon any "litmus test" for judicial nominees, emphasizing the independence of the third branch of government. "I don't believe in litmus tests," Jeb Bush told Chuck Todd last November.

But with the rise of an activist judiciary in the middle of the 20th century, constitutionalists have sought to rein in the power of the bench.



Advertisement

Customize your experience.

Login with Facebook