News
Featured Image
 shutterstock.com

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 17, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett was attacked for using the term “sexual preference” instead of “sexual orientation” in the context of homosexual “marriage.” Meanwhile, leading Democrats, including presidential candidate Joe Biden, have used the same terminology without any criticism. 

In response to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Barrett had said during this week’s confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee, “I have never discriminated on the basis of sexual preference, and would not ever discriminate on the basis of sexual preference. Like racism, I think discrimination is abhorrent.” 

A little later during the same hearing, Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) attacked Barrett for her comments. 

Not once but twice you used the term ‘sexual preference’ to describe those in the LGBTQ community,” she said. “And let me make clear: ‘sexual preference’ is an offensive and outdated term. It is used by anti-LGBTQ activists to suggest that sexual orientation is a choice. It is not. Sexual orientation is a key part of a person’s identity. That sexual orientation is both a normal expression of human sexuality and immutable was a key part of the majority’s opinion in Obergefell, which, by the way, Scalia did not agree with.” 

So if it is your view that sexual orientation is merely a preference, as you noted, then the LGBTQ community should be rightly concerned whether you would uphold their constitutional right to marry,” Hirono added. 

Conservative observers were quick to point out that Joe Biden himself has used the term “sexual preference” in the past, even just a few months ago.  

As reported by The Daily Wire, Biden said during a virtual roundtable event in May, “I’m going to need you to help this time rebuild the backbone of this country, the middle class, but this time bring everybody along regardless of color, sexual preference, their backgrounds, whether they have any … Just bring everybody along. 

The Washington Free Beacon released a video compilation of prominent Democrats using the term. 

Two of the Democrats quoted in the video are members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, namely Sens. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Dick Durbin (D-IL). 

The video also features several Democratic members of the House of Representatives, as well as the former mayor of Philadelphia, Michael Nutter. 

Pro-abortion and pro-homosexuality Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the progressive icon who died in September, had talked about “sexual preference,” as well. 

— Article continues below Petition —
PETITION: Urge the U.S. Senate to Confirm Amy Coney Barrett
  Show Petition Text
24867 have signed the petition.
Let's get to 25000!
Thank you for signing this petition!
Add your signature:
  Show Petition Text
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.
Keep me updated via email on this petition and related issues.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett                                                                                                                                                                                                 Graeme Jennings-Pool/Getty Images

PETITION UPDATE (10/26//2020)

In a resounding victory for supporters of life, family and freedom, the U.S. Senate has just confirmed Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court of the United States!

Justice Barrett was sworn-in by Justice Clarence Thomas and will swiftly fill the vacant seat and immediately begin participating in Supreme Court hearings.

The petitions signed by many of you - there are now over 40,000 signatures - supporting Judge Amy Coney Barrett were sent to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, as well as to the Officers of the USCCB.

Thank you for signing these petitions. As you can see, your signature really does make a difference!

We also know that many of you also made calls to your U.S. senators to encourage them to vote for Judge Barrett. Thank you!

__________________________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (10/22/2020)

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee just voted to advance Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Supreme Court nomination to the full Senate, leaving only one hurdle to go next week.

Every Republican on the committee voted for Barrett, President Donald Trump’s selection to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, while every committee Democrat boycotted the vote, CNBC reports.

Please READ the latest LifeSite article about the Senate Committee's vote here.

As you read above, Judge Barrett has one more hurdle next Monday. Of course, it's the BIGGEST hurdle.

So, if you haven't already, could we ask you to please call your U.S. senators to politely voice your support for Judge Barrett?

After SIGNING this petition, please scroll down the page, where you will find the list of all U.S. senators' contact details.

Let's keep working and praying so that we can see a pro-life judge sit on the Supreme Court.

____________________________________________________

PETITION UPDATE (10/15/20)

The fourth day of Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s Senate confirmation hearing for the open seat on the U.S. Supreme Court is going on now.

Please CLICK HERE to go to the livestream of the hearings.

Please watch and read EXCLUSIVE LifeSite videos and articles about Judge Amy Coney Barrett's hearings:

YouTube Videos:

'We are people of faith, the true body of Christ': Christians pray for SCOTUS confirmation hearings'

'"That's your job": Judge Barrett responds to relevance of Obamacare to SCOTUS confirmation'

Articles:

'Senator who badgered Barrett about Catholicism in 2017 presses her on abortion at confirmation hearing'

'Hawley, Barrett dismantle religious tests for office at Supreme Court hearing'

'Ted Cruz at Barrett hearing warns Democrats want to ‘erase’ religious liberty'

______________________________________________________________

Conservatives and Christians asked President Trump to deliver a proven constitutional originalist with a solid pro-life background, and he did.

Now, let's not be outdone by Leftist organizations which will be mobilizing their forces to write, call and visit their senators' constituency offices.

Please SIGN this urgent petition - to Senate Leadership - asking them to quickly confirm Barrett as the next Supreme Court justice.

Then, please take a couple of minutes to CALL YOUR U.S. SENATORS using their numbers below, and politely urge them to confirm Barrett.

When Amy Coney Barrett's senate confirmation hearing begins on Monday, October 12th, the mother of seven and devout Catholic is expected to face fierce opposition.

Of course, the anticipated attacks have nothing to do with Barrett's legal credentials, which are uniformly top-notch.

Instead, they have to do with her faith in Jesus and with her belief that life begins at conception.

This is nothing short of anti-Christian bigotry which cannot be tolerated.

The fact is, Amy Coney Barrett is the best candidate for the job, and she urgently needs our support.

By signing the petition, we can unite to powerfully speak with one voice. But, by calling your senators, you can ensure that they know their local constituents are concerned and interested enough to telephone their offices.

This is our time to get active! We must voice our support for Amy Coney Barrett at this crucial moment in our nation's history.

Please SIGN this petition, and then please use the contact details below to CALL YOUR U.S. SENATORS right-away! Thank you!

U.S. SENATORS' CONTACT DETAILS:

SENATORS AND PHONE NUMBERS -  https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact  

ALABAMA SENATORS 

Doug Jones – (202) 224-4124 

Richard C. Shelby – (202) 224-5744 

ALASKA SENATORS 

Lisa Murkowski – (202) 224-6665 

Dan Sullivan – (202) 224-3004 

ARIZONA SENATORS 

Martha McSally – (202) 224-2235 

Kyrsten Sinema – (202) 224-4521 

ARKANSAS SENATORS 

John Boozman – (202) 224-4843 

Tom Cotton – (202) 224-2353 

CALIFORNIA SENATORS 

Dianne Feinstein – (202) 224-3841 

Kamala D. Harris – (202) 224-3553 

COLORADO SENATORS 

Michael F. Bennett – (202) 224-5852 

Cory Gardner – (202) 224-5941 

CONNECTICUT SENATORS 

Richard Blumenthal – (202) 224-2823 

Christopher Murphy – (202) 224-4041 

DELAWARE SENATORS 

Thomas R. Carper – (202) 224-2441 

Christopher A. Coons – (202) 224-5042 

FLORIDA SENATORS 

Marco Rubio – (202) 224-3041 

Rick Scott – (202) 224-5274 

GEORGIA SENATORS 

Kelly Loeffler – (202) 224-3643  

David Perdue – (202) 224-3521 

HAWAII SENATORS 

Mazie K. Hirono – (202) 224-6361 

Brian Schatz – (202) 224-3934 

IDAHO SENATORS 

Mike Crapo – (202) 224-6142 

James E. Risch – (202) 224-2752 

ILLINOIS SENATORS 

Dick Durbin – (202) 224-2152 

Tammy Duckworth – (202) 224-2854 

INDIANA SENATORS 

Mike Braun – (202) 224-4814 

Todd Young – (202) 224-5623 

IOWA SENATORS 

Joni Ernst – (202) 224-3254 

Chuck Grassley – (202) 224-3774 

KANSAS SENATORS 

Jerry Moran – (202) 224-6521 

Pat Roberts – (202) 224-4744 

KENTUCKY SENATORS 

Mitch McConnell – (202) 224-2541 

Rand Paul – (202) 224-4343 

LOUISIANA SENATORS 

Bill Cassidy – (202) 224-5824 

John Kennedy – (202) 224-4623 

MAINE SENATORS 

Susan M. Collins – (202) 224-2523 

Angus S. King – (202) 224-5344 

MARYLAND SENATORS 

Benjamin L. Cardin – (202) 224-4524 

Chris Van Hollen – (202) 224-4654 

MASSACHUSETS SENATORS 

Edward J. Markey – (202) 224-2742 

Elizabeth Warren – (202) 224-4543 

MICHIGAN 

Gary C. Peters – (202) 224-6221 

Debbie Stabenow – (202) 224-4822 

MINNESOTA 

Amy Klobuchar – (202) 224-3244 

Tina Smith – (202) 224-5641 

MISSISSIPPI 

Cindy Hyde-Smith – (202) 224-5054 

Roger F. Wicker – (202) 224-6253 

MISSOURI 

Roy Blunt – (202) 224-5721 

Josh Hawley – (202) 224-6154 

MONTANA 

Steve Daines – (202) 224-2651 

Jon Tester – (202) 224-2644 

NEBRASKA 

Deb Fischer – (202) 224-6551 

Ben Sasse – (202) 224-4224 

NEVADA 

Catherine Cortez Masto – (202) 224-3542 

Jacky Rosen – (202) 224-6244 

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

Margaret Wood Hassan – (202) 224-3324 

Jeanne Shaheen – (202) 224-2841 

NEW JERSEY 

Cory A. Booker – (202) 224-3224 

Robert Menendez – (202) 224-4744 

NEW MEXICO 

Martin Heinrich – (202) 224-5521 

Tom Udall – (202) 224-6621 

NEW YORK 

Kirsten E. Gillibrand – (202) 224-4451 

Charles E. Schumer – (202) 224-6542 

NORTH CAROLINA 

Richard Burr – (202) 224-3154 

Thom Tillis – (202) 224-6342 

NORTH DAKOTA 

Kevin Cramer – (202) 224-2043 

John Hoeven – (202) 224-2551 

OHIO  

Sherrod Brown – (202) 224-2315 

Rob Portman – (202) 224-3353 

OKLAHOMA 

James M. Inhofe – (202) 224-4721 

James Lankford – (202) 224-5754 

OREGON 

Jeff Merkley – (202) 224-3753 

Ron Wyden – (202) 224-5244 

PENNSYLVANIA 

Robert P. Casey, Jr. – (202) 224-6324 

Patrick J. Toomey, Jr. – (202) 224-4254 

RHODE ISLAND 

Jack Reed – (202) 224-4642 

Sheldon Whitehouse – (202) 224-2921 

SOUTH CAROLINA 

Lindsey Graham – (202) 224-5972 

Tim Scott – (202) 224-6121 

SOUTH DAKOTA 

Mike Rounds – (202) 224-5842 

John Thune – (202) 224-2321 

TENNESSEE 

Lamar Alexander – (202) 224-4944 

Marsha Blackburn – (202) 224-3344 

TEXAS 

John Cornyn – (202) 224-2934 

Ted Cruz – (202) 224-5922 

UTAH 

Mike Lee – (202) 224-5444 

Mitt Romney – (202) 224-5251 

VERMONT 

Patrick J. Leahy – (202) 224-4242 

Bernard Sanders – (202) 224-5141 

VIRGINIA 

Tim Kaine – (202) 224-4024 

Mark R. Warner – (202) 224-2023 

WASHINGTON 

Maria Cantwell – (202) 224-3441 

Patty Murray – (202) 224-2621 

WEST VIRGINIA 

Shelley Moore Capito – (202) 224-6472 

Joe Manchin III – (202) 224-3954 

WISCONSIN 

Tammy Baldwin – (202) 224-5653 

Ron Johnson – (202) 224-5323 

WYOMING 

John Barrasso – (202) 224-6441 

Michael B. Enzi – (202) 224-3424

  Hide Petition Text

Event the Washington Post — certainly not a conservative newspaper — admitted, “Plenty of figures on the left — including Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden and the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, whom Barrett is hoping to replace on the high court — have also used the phrase, which was considered acceptable as recently as a decade or two ago.” 

And during a townhall event just this week, Biden commented, “The idea that an 8-year-old child or a 10-year-old child decides, ‘you know, I decided I want to be transgender, that’s what I think I’d like to be, it would make my life a lot easier’ – There should be zero discrimination.” 

It is not entirely clear from the wording whether the former vice president was saying that a child makes a decision to claim to be a member of the opposite sex, which would indicate it’s a preference. 

His comments could also be interpreted to mean that it’s not a decision, as the child would not decide to make his or her life more difficult by claiming to be a member of the opposite sex. 

In any case, Biden “explicitly endorsed sex changes for children as young as eight years old,” as pointed out by Frank Cannon, president of the American Principles Project

In Joe Biden’s view, a child too young to go see an Avengers film can decide to have his or her body permanently altered through surgery and chemical injections,” he continued. “Second or third graders are too young to comprehend the basics of human sexuality, let alone make such irreversible decisions. To mutilate children in such a way is a form of child abuse, and Americans, by a huge margin, don’t believe children this young should undergo such procedures.” 

In a tweet, the American Principles Project noted that most children by age eight have reached the developmental milestones of being able to tie their shoelaces and draw a diamond shape

Barrett, meanwhile, simply said she “certainly didn’t mean to use a term that would cause any offense in the LGBT community.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines
LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.

0 Comments

    Loading...