News
Featured Image
Federal Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau joins NB Liberal Leader Brian Gallant on the campaign trail at a Tim Horton's in Moncton on August 23, 2014.Justin Trudeau's Flickr page

New Brunswick’s Progressive Conservative Party, the province’s official Opposition, introduced a motion in the legislature today to debate newly-elected Liberal Premier Brian Gallant’s decision to scrap part of the province’s abortion regulations, scheduled to take effect January 1.

“Be it resolved that the Legislative Assembly urge the government to cause any changes to abortion services that it has adopted or intends to adopt to be the subject of a debate in the House, and to delay implementation of those changes until that debate has occurred,” reads the notice of motion introduced today by PC MLA Dorothy Shephard, and seconded by PC MLA Jody Carr.

Carr explained the purpose of the motion: “What we ‎are saying with this motion is for the Legislative Assembly to urge the government to make specific details of the abortion service changes made public, to have these specific changes debated openly by all MLA's in the Legislative Assembly, the People’s House, and to delay any changes until this occurs.”

The earliest opportunity the PCs have to call for the debate on the motion is Thursday.

Abortion took center stage in the Liberals election campaign in April in response to the announced closure of the province’s Morgentaler abortion facility. The party approved a resolution at the time calling for taxpayer-funded abortion in private facilities, reversing longstanding policy on the issue. In response, the reigning Conservatives at that time said they would maintain the status quo of funding so-called “medically necessary” abortions in hospitals.

Gallant announced at the end of November that the new regulations would “increase capacity” and “improve timeliness to access.”

The new measures include that:

  • obtaining an abortion will no longer require two doctors certifying that it is “medically required.”
  • abortion can now be performed by any doctor, not only a specialist.
  • abortion will now be tax-funded since it will be put “in the same category as any insured medical service.”
  • abortions must still be performed in hospitals.

Peter Ryan, executive director of New Brunswick Right to Life Association, welcomed the motion.

“NB Right to Life welcomes the motion put forward today, and very much believes the momentous changes proposed should be debated by the Legislative Assembly,” he told LifeSiteNews.

“It is entirely right that a major policy change, as the government is proposing, be duly considered by the people’s representatives.”

Ryan said that the result of the changes would be “tax-funded abortion on demand,” something that he said is frowned upon by most in New Brunswick and that despite talking points by the pro-abortion lobby, it is not required under existing law.

Rev. David Edwards, Bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Fredericton, wrote a letter to Mr. Gallant this week, urging him to “reconsider your decision to repeal restrictions on abortion access.”

“The issue of abortion is much more than a matter of individual rights; it bears on our ability to recognize, respect, and honour our shared humanity wherever it is found. It is my view that societies and civilizations are better as they cultivate these abilities, and worse as they fail to do so,” he wrote.

Ryan said his pro-life association is inviting people to come and take part in a “Keep the Lights On Campaign for Life” next Thursday to “show solidarity with unborn children and their mothers who would be affected by the proposed changes.”

The campaign includes two candlelight vigils outside the Legislature, the first of which was held December 11, while the next is slated for December 18. 

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.