Featured Image
Arkansas’ new Attorney General ran on a pro-life platform

 WASHINGTON, D.C., May 29, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — The United States Supreme Court will not prevent Arkansas from enforcing a 2015 law regulating medication abortions, despite Planned Parenthood’s wishes.

On Tuesday, the court issued without comment an order rejecting the abortion giant’s request to block a 2015 law that requires physicians who dispense abortion-inducing drugs to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. The decision enables the law to take effect in the middle of July as lawmakers originally intended, though Planned Parenthood intends to continue challenging it in lower courts.

“The Arkansas restriction, which was enacted supposedly to protect women's health, is medically unnecessary,” the abortion giant’s attorneys argued to the Supreme Court. Lawyers for the state responded that the “commonsense” law “merely requires medication abortion providers to have a contractual relationship (to ensure follow-up treatment if needed) with a physician that has admitting privileges.”

Planned Parenthood fears that the law would force the closure of its Little Rock and Fayetteville facilities, which only perform medication abortions. They say obstetricians will not agree to the contract. But pro-lifers have warned that chemical abortions, which have grown nearly as common as surgical abortions in recent years, are dangerous to mothers as well as to their babies.

A federal trial judge had previously blocked the law, although his decision was reversed by an appeals court panel that faulted him for failing to ascertain just how many women would be affected by the law.

“There is no right to choose medication abortion,” Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge told the Supreme Court.

Sometime next month, the Supreme Court is also expected to issue its ruling on a California law forcing pro-life pregnancy centers to advertise abortions.


Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.