News
Featured Image

A British women's magazine came under fire recently after it encouraged young teenagers to flirt with their friends’ parents to get ahead.

The teenage version of Tatler Magazine, a high society publication, told girls as young as 13 to “hone your social-seduction techniques,” and, when at a friend’s house, “flirt (gently) with the parent of the opposite sex and then write a witty thank-you letter.”

“You'll be invited everywhere — dinners, more country weekends, swanky holidays and so on, and so on.”

The advice earned critics across the spectrum, from feminists to a member of the British Parliament.

“Being nice and polite is one thing, trying to create a sexual frisson between your friend's parents and your teenage self is at the very least ill-advised,” said John Hemming, Liberal Democrat Member of Parliament. “We are in a world where children aged 12 and 13 are from time to time exploited and concern is expressed about that. I'm surprised that Tatler wish to encourage it.”

The British non-profit National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children estimates that “one in 20 children [aged 11 to 17] have experienced contact sexual abuse.” Likewise, “over 90% of children [aged 11 to 17] who experienced sexual abuse, were abused by someone they knew.”

Some have also expressed concern that the advice could put fathers at risk. A clinical psychologist told the Telegraph that the average father could be confused by the flirting, and an op-ed in the same paper noted that “men who work around teenage girls – and particularly teachers – live in constant terror of paedophilic allegations.”

Tatler's advice concludes by telling teens, “Don't be a creep,” and that “there is a fine line.”

Tatler has since apologized. “If the Tatler feature is read in its entirety it is clear that we intended it to be light-hearted,” a spokesman told the Daily Mail. “We're sorry if the content has been taken out of context and apologise for any offence caused.”

Comments

Commenting Guidelines

LifeSiteNews welcomes thoughtful, respectful comments that add useful information or insights. Demeaning, hostile or propagandistic comments, and streams not related to the storyline, will be removed.

LSN commenting is not for frequent personal blogging, on-going debates or theological or other disputes between commenters.

Multiple comments from one person under a story are discouraged (suggested maximum of three). Capitalized sentences or comments will be removed (Internet shouting).

LifeSiteNews gives priority to pro-life, pro-family commenters and reserves the right to edit or remove comments.

Comments under LifeSiteNews stories do not necessarily represent the views of LifeSiteNews.