LONDON (LifeSiteNews) – A British Member of Parliament has accused a leading heart health charity of suppressing research that shows COVID jabs cause harm.
During a discussion in the U.K. Parliament on December 13, Conservative MP Andrew Bridgen alleged that a leading member of the British Heart Foundation (BHF) has covered up data that reveals COVID injections increase the risk of heart diseases.
“It has been brought to my attention by a whistleblower from a very reliable source that one of these institutions is covering up clear data that reveals that the mRNA vaccine increased inflammation of the heart arteries,” Bridgen stated.
READ: Major autopsy report finds COVID jabs responsible for sudden cardiovascular deaths
“They are covering this up in fear that they may lose funding from the pharmaceutical industry,” he continued.
“The leader of that cardiology research department has a prominent leadership role with the British Heart Foundation, and I am very disappointed to say that he has sent out non-disclosure agreements to his research team to ensure that this important data never sees the light of day.”
“This is an absolute disgrace.”
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: A prominent leader of the British Heart Foundation has conspired to cover-up research linking mNRA jabs with heart inflammation, says British MP@TheBHF @SteveBarclay @ABridgen pic.twitter.com/VVWPfNmGhk
— James Freeman (@JamesfWells) December 13, 2022
The British Heart Foundation is a research charity in the U.K. that funds research into treatments for cardiovascular disease and does PR work to shape and influence public policy and perception regarding the prevention of heart diseases.
READ: Swiss study shows heart injury in all mRNA COVID jab recipients, myocarditis in 3%
Labour MP Stella Creasy has threatened to table an amendment to the Government’s upcoming Bill of Rights to give women the “fundamental right to an abortion”.
Ms Creasy has already been instrumental in imposing abortion on Northern Ireland, promoting DIY abortion, and banning pro-life vigils around abortion clinics. Now she wants to remove any restrictions on abortion. She even wants decisions on abortion law to be taken out of the hands of elected politicians by making it a “right”.
Sign this petition calling on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to resist any attempt to make abortion a right.
There is no right to abortion in international law. None of the nine core treaties of the United Nations recognises abortion as a human right (including the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women).
Instead, several human rights instruments recognise the right to life of children before birth. The Declaration of the Rights of the Child states: “... the child by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection before as well as after birth...”
There can be no right to end the life of an innocent unborn child.
The UK already has some of the most permissive abortion legislation in Europe. A right to abortion would make the situation here even worse. Creating an absolute “right” to abortion would logically mean removing any restrictions. The worst implications of this could include:
• The removal of any gestational limits, allowing abortion up to birth
• Abortion based on the gender of the baby
• The removal of medical safeguards, including the involvement of doctors
• Erosion of conscience rights for medical professionals
Sign this petition to tell Mr Sunak not to make abortion a right.
The overturn of a Court decision in the United States has no direct implications for abortion law in the UK, which is regulated by Acts of Parliament. The regulation of a controversial issue such as abortion should lie with democratically elected MPs, not the courts. Robert Buckland MP, the former Justice Secretary, has warned that enshrining abortion as a right “risks bringing our courts into the political arena as in the United States”.
Tell Mr Sunak to stand up for parliamentary democracy and a true understanding of human rights, and resist any attempt to make abortion a right.
On December 14 the BHF released a statement on its Twitter account, denying the accusations made by Bridgen.
“We do not recognize these claims and strongly refute all allegations made about colleagues in senior leadership roles within British Heart Foundation (BHF),” the charity spokesperson wrote.
Our response to comments made by Andrew Bridgen MP. pic.twitter.com/tcnuT2jtTu
— BHF (@TheBHF) December 14, 2022
In his speech in the House of Parliament, Bridgen quoted the former editor of the British Medical Journal, Richard Smith, who said, “Research misconduct is rife and has not effectively been tackled. Something is rotten in British medicine and it has been for a long time.”
He also cited Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, one of the world’s most renowned medical journals, who at one point suggested that “possibly half of the published medical literature may simply be untrue.”
Bridgen cited Pfizer and Moderna trial data which showed that 1 in 800 recipients of the mRNA injections suffered from a serious side effect.
Based on those original trials, “someone was far more likely to suffer a serious side effect from the vaccine than to be hospitalized with the ancestral, more lethal strain of the virus.” he said.
According to Bridgen, these findings “are a smoking gun, suggesting that the vaccines should have likely never been approved in the first place.”
The Conservative MP went on to name examples of vaccines that had been withdrawn from the market for a much lower side effect rate, like the Swine Flu vaccine in 1976 or the Rotavirus vaccine in 1999.
Furthermore, Bridgen explained how the regulatory agencies that approved the COVID shots, like the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in Britain and the FDA in the U.S., “end up relying on the summary results of the drug companies in their sponsored trials, where the raw data is kept commercially confidential.”
He went on to say that the MHRA “has a huge financial conflict of interest” because it receives “86% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry they are supposed to regulate.”
Moreover, Bridgen talked about the power and influence of big pharma.
“The real scandal is that those with the responsibility and scientific integrity, namely doctors, academic institutions, and medical journals collude with the industry for financial gain,” the British MP said.
“Big Pharma exerts its power by capturing the political environment through lobbying, the knowledge environment through funding university research and the influence in medical education, preference shaping through the capture of the media, financing think tanks, etc., etc.”
He stated that the pharmaceutical industry has “a fiduciary obligation to produce profit for their shareholders” but “no fiduciary obligation to provide the right medicine for patients.”
READ: ‘Brilliant’ new documentary exposes how Big Pharma and gov’t teamed up to push the COVID vaccines
Bridgen continued his verbal attack on the pharmaceutical industry, by saying that it is “psychopathic for its profit-making conduct,” and by citing an analysis that states that the third most common cause of death worldwide is the “side effects of prescribed medication that were mostly avoidable.”
The Conservative MP called for an “immediate and complete suspension of any more COVID vaccines that use mRNA technology,” and stressed that “silence on this issue is more contagious than the virus itself.”
“We’ve already sacrificed, in my view, far too many citizens on the altar of ignorance and unfettered corporate greed.”
“[…] and the data clearly shows to anyone who wants to look at it, the mRNA vaccines, they’re not safe, they’re not effective, and they’re not necessary,” Bridgen said. “I implore the government to halt their use immediately.”
Bridgen concluded his speech with the following words: “The government’s current policy on the mRNA vaccines is on the wrong side of medical ethics, is on the wrong side of scientific data, and ultimately, Madam Deputy Speaker, it will be on the wrong side of history.”